Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence


Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence > Year 1975 > June 1975 Decisions > G.R. No. L-38826 June 27, 1975 - TEOTIMO ALAURIN, ET AL. v. JOSE NEPOMUCENO, ET AL.:




PHILIPPINE SUPREME COURT DECISIONS

SECOND DIVISION

[G.R. No. L-38826. June 27, 1975.]

TEOTIMO ALAURIN and VISITACION MAGNO, Petitioners, v. HONORABLE JUDGE JOSE NEPOMUCENO, Judge of the Court of First Instance of Albay; CRESENCIANA ATUN and LAMBERTO ESQUIVEL, Respondents.

Otillo Sy Bongon, for Petitioners.

Kallos Law Office for Private Respondents.

SYNOPSIS


Petitioners questioned the order of respondent court in Civil Case No. 4883 enjoining the execution of a final judgment of ejectment in their favor. In instituting Civil Case No. 4883 private respondents claimed that the ejectment decision is void for want of jurisdiction of the City Court to promulgate the decision without first passing upon the issue of the validity of the title of petitioners which was squarely raised in the trial court.

During the pendency of the petition and in answer to the query of this Court, whether the parties could await at least the action of the trial court, the parties filed a joint manifestation wherein they agreed: (a) to suspend the petition for certiorari and have Civil Case No. 4883 tried on the merits; (b) to abide by whatever decision might be rendered in said case; and (c) prayed for the transfer of Civil Case No. 4883 from Branch I to Branch II of the Court of First Instance of Albay and direct the presiding judge therein to try and decide the case within ninety (90) days notice hereof.

The Supreme Court dismissed the petition and directed the transfer of said case to Branch II where it will be tried on the merits. The parties were enjoined to observe the agreement embodied in their joint manifestation.


SYLLABUS


1. CERTIORARI; DISMISSAL; AGREEMENT BY THE PARTIES, GROUND FOR DISMISSING THE PETITION. — An agreement entered into by the parties expressing their desire to have the pending in the court below tried and decided expeditiously and to abide by whatever decision might be rendered therein, is a sufficient ground to dismiss the petition.


D E C I S I O N


BARREDO, J.:


Petition for certiorari to set aside the order of respondent court in its Civil Case No. 4883, entitled Cresenciana Atun, Et. Al. v. Teotimo Alaurin, Et Al., granting the writ of preliminary injunction prayed for therein by herein respondents against the execution of the final judgment of ejectment in favor of petitioners.

It appears that in the action of ejectment (Civil Case No. 990 of the City Court of Legaspi City), petitioners secured a judgment ordering respondents to vacate a parcel of land, with an area of 205 square meters situated in Legaspi Port, Legaspi City and known as Lot No. 57 of Plan MSI-V-11535-D of the Cadastral Survey of said city. In said ejectment case, respondents claimed prior and continued possession of the land in question, and with respect to Original Certificate of Title No. 28 of the Register of Deeds of Legaspi City 1 on which petitioners based their action, respondents alleged that the same was secured through fraud. Upon this decision being appealed to the Court of First Instance, the same was affirmed, the court holding that the evidence of prior possession in favor of petitioners was so strong that the action for annulment of petitioner’s (Teotimo Alaurin) title (Civil Case No. 4602 filed by the Republic of the Philippines at the instance of respondents) was "only a mere weak attempt to annul an existing certificate of title in favor of which the presumption of law is clearly on its side." Eventually, this decision of the Court of First Instance was affirmed by the Court of Appeals, said appellate court holding that Civil Case No. 4602 is "a contingency which may not be taken into consideration in deciding the issue of who has prior possession." Respondents’ attempt to have the case appealed to the Supreme Court did not prosper, and so, the ejectment decision became final and executory.

It is the writ of execution issued by the City Court of Legaspi City on the basis of the final judgment just mentioned that respondents have sought to enjoin in Civil Case No. 4883, alleging as a main cause of action that the ejectment decision itself is void for lack of jurisdiction, considering that the issue of the validity of petitioners’ title which was squarely raised was not passed upon before the issue of possession. Of course, respondents also reiterated their claim of title over the land in dispute. Over the opposition of petitioners, respondent court issued the writ of preliminary injunction prayed for. Incidentally, it may be mentioned that on July 1, 1974, Civil Case No. 4602, the case filed by the Republic was dismissed, but the Court has not been informed as to whether or not the decision is already final.

At the hearing of this case, in order to avoid further complications should respondents be immediately ejected before their effort to have the issue of title finally determined, no matter how remote might be the possibility of an outcome thereof favorable to respondents, the Court inquired from the parties if there was any cogent impediment to their awaiting at least the decision of the trial court in Civil Case No. 4883 and abiding by whatever action the said court might deem proper as to the preliminary injunction, after it renders its decision on the merits. Whereupon, the parties filed the following Joint Manifestation:jgc:chanrobles.com.ph

"The PARTIES, assisted by their respective counsel, unto the Honorable Supreme Court respectfully set forth:jgc:chanrobles.com.ph

"1. That during the hearing of the above-entitled case on November 25, 1974, the parties agreed to the suspension of the consideration of the petition for certiorari. Instead the parties agreed to have Civil Case No. 4883 entitled Cresenciana Atun, et. al. versus Teotimo Alaurin, et. al before the Court of First Instance of Albay tried on the merits.

2. That after a decision is rendered in Civil Case No. 4883, the winning party shall possess the land in litigation — that is, if the plaintiffs win (private respondents herein) they shall be entitled to the writ of preliminary injunction issued by the Court of First Instance of Albay, otherwise, plaintiffs shall immediately vacate the premises and the defendants (petitioners herein) restored to the possession of the land in litigation.

3. That the parties pray that a directive be issued by the Honorable Supreme Court to Branch II, Court of First Instance of Albay (Branch 1 of the same Court where Civil Case No. 4883 was assigned for hearing has no presiding Judge) to expedite the trial of Civil Case No. 4883, preferably to hear and decide the case within ninety (90) days from notice.

WHEREFORE, the parties pray that the Honorable Supreme Court issue the corresponding resolution on this joint manifestation.

Legaspi City, for Manila, Philippines

December 2, 1974

(SGD.) CRESENCIANA ATUN (SGD.) TEOTIMO ALAURIN

Respondent Petitioner

(SGD.) LAMBERTO ESQUIVEL (SGD.) VISITACION MAGNO

Respondent Petitioner

(SGD.) MOISES C. KALLOS (SGD.) OTILIO SY BONGON

Counsel for Respondents Counsel for Petitioners

KALLOS LAW OFFICE Iraya, Peñaranda Street

Legazpi City Legazpi City"

(Pages 111-112, Record.)

WHEREFORE, the instant case is dismissed and the trial court is hereby ordered to expedite the trial of Civil Case No. 4883 above referred to and to try and decide the same within ninety (90) days from notice hereof. Branch I of the Court of First Instance of Albay to which said case pertains being presently without a presiding judge, it is ordered that the said case be transferred to Branch II and that the judge therein presiding comply with this decision. The parties are enjoined to observe the agreement embodied in their aforequoted joint manifestation.

No costs.

Fernando (Chairman), Antonio, Aquino and Concepcion, Jr., JJ., concur.

Endnotes:



1. This title was based on a sales patent granted by the Director of Lands.




Back to Home | Back to Main




















chanrobles.com





ChanRobles On-Line Bar Review

ChanRobles Internet Bar Review : www.chanroblesbar.com

ChanRobles MCLE On-line

ChanRobles Lawnet Inc. - ChanRobles MCLE On-line : www.chanroblesmcleonline.com






June-1975 Jurisprudence                 

  • A.M. No. 145 CFI June 11, 1975 - VICENTE A. CASTRO v. VICENTE P. BULLECER

  • A.C. No. 223-J June 11, 1975 - ROMEO S. PEREZ v. CARLOS ABIERA

  • G.R. No. L-25650 June 11, 1975 - ISIDORA L. CABALIW, ET AL. v. SOTERO SADORRA, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-31225 June 11, 1975 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. PABLO SAMONTE, JR.

  • G.R. No. L-31284 June 11, 1975 - SEVEN-UP BOTTLING COMPANY, INC. v. WORKMEN’S COMPENSATION COMMISSION, ET AL.

  • A.M. No. 207-MJ June 19, 1975 - PRISCA B. ARAZA v. JUANITO C. REYES

  • G.R. No. L-26183 June 19, 1975 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. ANGEL N. SARMIENTO

  • G.R. No. L-32281 June 19, 1975 - PEDRO ERMAC v. CENON MEDELO, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-37630 June 19, 1975 - CATALINO LACIFICAR v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-24971 June 20, 1975 - GREGORIO TAN, JR. v. MALCOLM G. SARMIENTO, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-39254 June 20, 1975 - CENON C. SOLIS, ET AL. v. JAIME R. AGLORO

  • A.M. No. 276-MJ June 27, 1975 - HADJIRUL TAHIL v. CARLITO A. EISMA

  • A.M. No. 667 MJ June 27, 1975 - PAULINO B. INTING v. GERTRUDES F. BERNALDEZ

  • G.R. No. L-23419 June 27, 1975 - BEJAMIN SEBIAL v. ROBERTA SEBIAL, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-26358 June 27, 1975 - DONATO LOPEZ, JR. v. CFI OF MANILA, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-30037 June 27, 1975 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. ERNESTO DE LA VICTORIA

  • G.R. No. L-30050 June 27, 1975 - CESAR B. VILLANUEVA v. NUMERIANO G. ESTENZO, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-31447 June 27, 1975 - AURELIO R. BANZON v. FEDERICO L. CABATO, ET AL.

  • G.R. Nos. L-33138-39 June 27, 1975 - BATANGAS LAGUNA TAYABAS BUS COMPANY, INC., ET AL. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-38532 June 27, 1975 - ANTIPOLO HIGHWAY LINES, INC., ET AL. v. AMADO G. INCIONG, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-38826 June 27, 1975 - TEOTIMO ALAURIN, ET AL. v. JOSE NEPOMUCENO, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-39247 June 27, 1975 - IN RE: FELIX BALANAY, JR. v. ANTONIO M. MARTINEZ, ET AL.

  • G.R. Nos. L-39423 & L-39684 June 27, 1975 - JUAN C. PIMENTEL, ET AL. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-39800 June 27, 1975 - ROMEO N. HERNANDEZ v. JOSE C. COLAYCO, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-40415 June 27, 1975 - PEDRO E. GAHOL v. FRANCISCO MAT. RIODIQUE

  • G.R. No. L-40624 June 27, 1975 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. RICARDO B. NEPOMUCENO

  • G.R. No. L-40683 June 27, 1975 - ARTURO SAMONTE, ET AL. v. FAUSTINO SAMONTE, ET AL., ET AL.

  • A.M. No. 201 MJ June 30, 1975 - CECILIA A. DE LA PAZ v. SANTIAGO INUTAN

  • A.M. No. 222-MJ June 30, 1975 - SANTIAGO PALADIN v. ARTURO V. MIRALLES

  • A.M. No. 267 MJ June 30, 1975 - RAFAEL SALCEDO v. DAVID ALFECHE, JR.

  • G.R. Nos. L-22805 & L-27858 June 30, 1975 - WONDER MECHANICAL ENGINEERING CORPORATION v. COURT OF TAX APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-25649 June 30, 1975 - ASSOCIATED LABOR UNION, ET AL. v. CENTRAL AZUCARERA DE LA CARLOTA, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-25965 June 30, 1975 - AMERICAN RUBBER COMPANY v. COLLECTOR OF INTERNAL REVENUE

  • G.R. No. L-26502 June 30, 1975 - ROSARIO M. PONCE ENRILE v. ALFONSO PONCE ENRILE

  • G.R. No. L-27044 & L-27452 June 30, 1975 - COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. ENGINEERING EQUIPMENT AND SUPPLY COMPANY, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-28773 June 30, 1975 - FRANCISCO ORTIGAS, JR. v. LUFTHANSA GERMAN AIRLINES

  • G.R. No. L-29837 June 30, 1975 - STA. ANA HARDWARE & CO. v. "Y" SHIPPING CORPORATION

  • G.R. No. L-30489 June 30, 1975 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. ALBERTO MACASO

  • G.R. No. L-31953 June 30, 1975 - REYNALDO ALARAS, ET AL. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-33641 June 30, 1975 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. NICASIO EDAÑO

  • G.R. No. L-37106 June 30, 1975 - JOSE M. LONTOC v. GREGORIO G. PINEDA

  • G.R. No. L-37844 June 30, 1975 - PATRICIO ALCANTARA, JR. v. CASTRENCE C. VELOSO

  • G.R. No. L-38701 June 30, 1975 - BAYER PHILIPPINES INC., ET AL. v. ENRIQUE A. AGANA, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-39046 June 30, 1975 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. MELANIO ANIN, ET AL.