Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence > Year 1979 > June 1979 Decisions > G.R. No. L-39016 June 29, 1979 - TAMDA SERVICE COOPERATIVE, INC. v. CITY MAYOR OF TACLOBAN CITY:

This is a petition for review by way of certiorari of the judgment of the Court of First Instance of Leyte, Branch IV in Special Civil Action No. 5052 entitled "Tamda Service Cooperative, Inc., Plaintiff, . The City Mayor of Tacloban City, Et Al., Defendants" for mandamus with preliminary injunction and damages dated May 20, 1974 dismissing the action on the ground that the plaintiff Tamda Service Cooperative, Inc. may not lawfully organize for the purpose of engaging in the operation of motor vehicles for hire by the general public, it being an activity totally alien to the nature and purposes of cooperatives as contemplated in the Non-Agricultural Cooperative Act (R.A. 2023), citing the opinion of the Honorable Secretary of Justice dated March 29, 1973 who also ruled that the Cooperatives Administration Office erred in registering the plaintiff as a cooperative to operate motorized cabs principally for hire to the general public and that the Public Service Commission likewise erred in registering and granting a franchise to the cooperative operating as common carrier.

In the Resolution of this Court dated January 17, 1975, the Court resolved to give due course to the petition. In due time, both petitioner and respondents filed their respective briefs and on June 27, 1975, the petition was submitted for decision.

Meanwhile, in a Manifestation dated October 4, 1978, respondents prayed this Court to dismiss the petition on the ground that petitioner is no longer legally existing due to noncompliance with requirements under Presidential Decree No. 175 in failing to submit copies of its financial statements and minutes of its meetings to the Ministry of Local Government and Community Development Regional Office No. VIII, the agency in charge of the supervision of cooperatives under said decree, as certified to by the Assistant Regional Director, and that petitioner is no longer legally authorized to operate motorized tricycle services within Tacloban City as its Certificate of Public Convenience issued by the Public Service Commission in Case No. 17-568 for a period of 5 years from Sept. 24, 1971 had already expired.chanrobles virtual lawlibrary

Respondents conclude that the instant petition has become moot and academic considering that the legal existence of petitioner as a cooperative and as a licensee to operate motorized tricycle services in Tacloban City has long ceased.

Petitioner, having been required to comment on said Manifestation, admitted its failure to submit copies of its financial statements and minutes of its meetings to the Ministry of Local Government and Community Development because of its inability to secure a business permit as a cooperative from respondent city officials but denied that it is no longer existing since its application for re-registration has not been denied nor has it been ordered liquidated by the Director of the Bureau of Cooperative Development. Petitioner also admitted its failure to renew its franchise.chanrobles.com.ph : virtual law library

Considering the admissions of petitioner as recited above, there is merit to the contention of respondents that this case has indeed become moot and academic. Petitioner, having ceased as a cooperative entity and its franchise lapsed, it has lost its legal standing and whatever reliefs that may be granted may no longer be enforced or executed.

WHEREFORE, IN VIEW OF THE FOREGOING, the instant petition is hereby dismissed. No costs.

SO ORDERED.

Teehankee, (Chairman), Makasiar, Fernandez, De Castro and Melencio Herrera, JJ., concur.