SUPREME COURT DECISIONS

Search for www.chanrobles.com

PLEASE CLICK HERE FOR THE LATEST ➔ SUPREME COURT DECISIONS

EN BANC

G.R. No. 1478  February 16, 1904

THE UNITED STATES,Complainant-Appellee, vs. JUAN DE LA CRUZ, ET AL.,Defendants-Appellants.

Geo. W. Lyon for appellants.
Office of the Solicitor-General Araneta for appellee.

MAPA, J.:

The defendants were sentenced in the Court of First Instance to the property of twenty years' imprisonment for the crime of brigandage, punished by section 1 of Act No. 518 of the Commission. The merits of the case demonstrate sufficiently the guilty of the said defendants and justify the sentence for the aforementioned crime.chanrobles virtual law library

The amendment to the complaint made before the presentation of the evidence for the defense has not prejudiced, nor could it have prejudiced, any essential rights of the defendants as well because it did not affect the essence of the crime charged, but merely an accidental detail of the same, as because it did not deprive the accused of an opportunity to produce evidence for their defense, if they had desired, in relation to the said amendment; its allowance was not, therefore, a fatal error, as the defense contends, relying upon section 10 of General Orders No. 58.chanrobles virtual law library

For the reason stated we affirm the sentence appealed from, imposing the cost of both instances upon the defendants. So ordered.chanrobles virtual law library

Arellano, C. J., Torres, Cooper, Willard, McDonough and Johnson, JJ., concur.