ChanRobles Virtual law Library




SUPREME COURT DECISIONS

google search for chanrobles.comSearch for www.chanrobles.com

PLEASE CLICK HERE FOR THE LATEST ➔ SUPREME COURT DECISIONS





www.chanrobles.com

EN BANC

G.R. No. 2000  April 19, 1905

THE UNITED STATES,Complainant-Appellee, vs. VICENTE LIM TICO, ET AL.,Defendants-Appellants.

Nazario Constantino and James Ostrand for appellants.
Office of the Solicitor-General Araneta for appellee.

WILLARD, J.:

There were three defendants in the court below. Of these Dy Too was acquitted; Tan Chui was convicted, but did not appeal; Vicente Lim Tico was convicted, and has appealed.chanroblesvirtualawlibrary chanrobles virtual law library

The appellants made no confession to the police officers or the detectives. The testimony of the witnesses Marshall, Hard, Compton, and Farland as to extrajudicial confessions made by the defendant Tan Chui and others can not prejudice the appellant Lim Tico. As to him the testimony of these witnesses is hearsay, and inadmissible.chanroblesvirtualawlibrary chanrobles virtual law library

With this testimony eliminated, the only evidence against the appellant that remains is the testimony of his codefendant, Tan Chui, given at the trial. None of the property stolen was found in the possession of the appellant. There was testimony that he and Tan Chui were not friends, that they had quarreled, and that Tan Chui had made threats against him.chanroblesvirtualawlibrary chanrobles virtual law library

Tan Chui, in his testimony, inculpated himself as well as the appellant, but it is to be observed that the Government, while it had no evidence against the appellant, did have other evidence against Tan Chui - evidence to the effect that he was in possession of some of the property stolen.chanroblesvirtualawlibrary chanrobles virtual law library

We have no intention of laying down the proposition that the testimony of an accomplice can not be used for the purposes of a conviction, but under the circumstances of this case we agree with the Solicitor-General that this appellant ought not to be convicted upon the sole and unsupported evidence of Tan Chui.chanroblesvirtualawlibrary chanrobles virtual law library

The judgments so far as it relates to Vicente Lim Tico is reversed, and he is acquitted, with the costs as to him de oficio.chanroblesvirtualawlibrary chanrobles virtual law library

Arellano, C.J., Torres, Mapa, Johnson and Carson, JJ., concur.



























chanrobles.com





ChanRobles Legal Resources:

ChanRobles On-Line Bar Review

ChanRobles Internet Bar Review : www.chanroblesbar.com

ChanRobles MCLE On-line

ChanRobles Lawnet Inc. - ChanRobles MCLE On-line : www.chanroblesmcleonline.com