SUPREME COURT DECISIONS

Search for www.chanrobles.com

PLEASE CLICK HERE FOR THE LATEST ➔ SUPREME COURT DECISIONS

EN BANC

G.R. No. 1958  January 30, 1905

THE UNITED STATES,Complainant-Appellee, vs. ESTEBAN CABINGAN,Defendant-Appellant.

Pablo Trinidad for appellant.
Office of the Solicitor-General Araneta for appellee.

MAPA, J.:

It appears fully proven by the testimony of the witnesses for the defense as well as by those of the prosecution that the defendant was taken prisoner by band of brigands commanded by Julian Ramos and that he left the band at the first opportunity he found and reported immediately to the local authority of his town, giving an account of what had taken place.chanroblesvirtualawlibrary chanrobles virtual law library

The mere fact that the defendant was among the members of the band during the time he was prisoner does not constitute nor can it constitute the crime of bandolerismo. Such a circumstance created by force and, evidently, contrary to the will of the defendant can not be charged against him in any manner, since it is proven that he left the band as soon as he had the chance to do so. Will, on his part, is lacking, and intention is a most indispensable element in determining the existence of any crime.chanroblesvirtualawlibrary chanrobles virtual law library

Therefore we reverse the judgment below and acquit the defendant. The warden of Bilibid Prison shall be given the necessary orders to release him immediately, the costs in both instances to be de oficio. So ordered.chanroblesvirtualawlibrary chanrobles virtual law library

Arellano, C.J., Torres, Johnson and Carson, JJ., concur.