SUPREME COURT DECISIONS

Search for www.chanrobles.com

PLEASE CLICK HERE FOR THE LATEST ➔ SUPREME COURT DECISIONS

EN BANC

G.R. No. L-2382  April 5, 1906

ARSENIO JIMENEZ,Plaintiff-Appellee, vs. JULIO JAVELLANA, Administrator of the Estate of Maximo Jalandoni,Defendant-Appellant.chanroblesvirtualawlibrary chanrobles virtual law library

JOHNSON, J.:

This was an action brought by the plaintiff against the defendant to recover the sum of 648 pesos for professional services rendered to Maximo Jalandoni during his last sickness. The claim was presented to a commission appointed under sections 773-776 of the Code of Procedure in Civil Actions. The said commission disallowed many of the items of the claim of the plaintiff. From the decision of the commission the plaintiff appealed to the Court of First Instance of the Province of Iloilo. The judge of the Court of First Instance, after hearing the evidence adduced during the trial of said case, rendered a judgment in favor of the plaintiff in the sum of 581.81 pesos. From this decision the defendant appealed to this court. The plaintiff asks for a confirmation of the decision of the inferior court.chanroblesvirtualawlibrary chanrobles virtual law library

During the trial the plaintiff showed by competent witnesses the following facts:chanrobles virtual law library

First. That he had been employed by the deceased, Maximo Jalandoni, as a physician to render professional services during the last sickness of the latter.chanroblesvirtualawlibrary chanrobles virtual law library

Second. That he performed the services which were itemized and set out in his complaint.chanroblesvirtualawlibrary chanrobles virtual law library

Third. That the charges for the services there itemized were reasonable.chanroblesvirtualawlibrary chanrobles virtual law library

The defendant attempted to prove that the plaintiff had not been employed by the said deceased and that the plaintiff had not performed the services itemized in his account.chanroblesvirtualawlibrary chanrobles virtual law library

An examination of the evidence adduced during the trial convinces us that there is a great preponderance of evidence in favor of the claim of the plaintiff. The judgment of the inferior court is therefore hereby affirmed with costs After the expiration of twenty days let final judgment be entered and ten days thereafter let the case be remanded to the lower court for proper procedure. So ordered.chanroblesvirtualawlibrary chanrobles virtual law library

Arellano, C.J., Torres, Carson and Willard JJ., concur.
Mapa, J., did not vote.