ChanRobles Virtual law Library
SUPREME COURT DECISIONS
Search for www.chanrobles.comPLEASE CLICK HERE FOR THE LATEST ➔ SUPREME COURT DECISIONS
EN BANC
G.R. No. L-2763 March 3, 1906
W.L. WRIGHT,Plaintiff-Appellee, vs. ALFRED F. SMITH, ET AL.,Defendants-Appellants.
Thos. D. Aitken for appellants.
W.L. Wright, in his own behalf.
WILLARD, J.:
This action was brought to recover on a promissory note dated June 20, 1904. The only claim presented by the appellant, the defendant below, is that the note was void because no revenue stamp was placed upon it, citing article 11 of the royal decree of May 29, 1894.chanroblesvirtualawlibrary chanrobles virtual law library
This contention has been decided adversely to the appellant in the case of Rodriguez vs. Martinez, 1 No. 1913, September 29, 1905.chanroblesvirtualawlibrary chanrobles virtual law library
The judgment of the court below is affirmed, with costs. After the expiration of twenty days let judgment be entered in accordance herewith and the case remanded to the lower court for execution. So ordered.chanroblesvirtualawlibrary chanrobles virtual law library
Arellano, C.J., Torres, Mapa, Johnson, and Carson, JJ., concur.
Endnotes:
1 Page 67, supra.
