ChanRobles Virtual law Library




SUPREME COURT DECISIONS

google search for chanrobles.comSearch for www.chanrobles.com

PLEASE CLICK HERE FOR THE LATEST ➔ SUPREME COURT DECISIONS



G.R. No. 4282 August 18, 1908
UNITED STATES vs. CHIONG CHUICO, ET AL. -->

www.chanrobles.com

EN BANC

G.R. No. 4282 August 18, 1908

THE UNITED STATES,Plaintiff-Appellee, vs. CHIONG CHUICO, YAP-YNTING, CHIONG CHANG, YAP-SUANGCO, LIM UI, UY-JAN-LLING, and LIM-TIONGCO,Defendants-Appellants.

Domingo Franco, and Jose Pozas, for appellants.
Attorney-General Araneta, for appellee.

WILLARD, J. :chanrobles virtual law library

In each of the seventh case above-mentioned, the defendant was convicted for selling opium in violation of Act No. 1461. The evidence of the government sufficiently proved the offense in each case. No evidence was offered by the defendants, except that of two witnesses, one the defendant Lim-Qui. On cross-examination he was asked what was the substance contained in the small can and then in court, which the witnesses for the government had testified was bought from him. His counsel objected to the questions, the court overruled the objection, and directed the witness to answer. Thereupon his counsel; withdraw him from the stand and asked to have all the testimony given by him stricken from the record.chanroblesvirtualawlibrary chanrobles virtual law library

The only other witness was Du-Buntiong, was tried at the same time with the seven defendants above-mentioned, but who did not appeal. His testimony related to the sale by himself, and there was nothing in it which could relate to the other defendants, except some statements about the private character of one of the witnesses for the Government.chanroblesvirtualawlibrary chanrobles virtual law library

The testimony of prosecution was, therefore, uncontradicted. The fact that the witnesses for the government made a purchases of opium for the purpose of securing evidence to convict the defendants of a violation of the law, did not make them accomplices in the crime, and there testimony stands as the testimony of any other witness in a case. (Commonwealth vs. Baker, 155 Mass., 287.)chanrobles virtual law library

The judgment of the court below in each case above-mentioned is affirmed, with one-seventh of the costs of this instance against each against one of the seven defendants. So ordered.chanroblesvirtualawlibrary chanrobles virtual law library

Arellano, C.J., Torres, Mapa, Carson and Tracey, JJ., concur.



























chanrobles.com





ChanRobles Legal Resources:

ChanRobles On-Line Bar Review

ChanRobles Internet Bar Review : www.chanroblesbar.com

ChanRobles MCLE On-line

ChanRobles Lawnet Inc. - ChanRobles MCLE On-line : www.chanroblesmcleonline.com