SUPREME COURT DECISIONS

PLEASE CLICK HERE FOR THE LATEST ➔ SUPREME COURT DECISIONS

G.R. No. 4382 August 20, 1908
UNITED STATES vs. PEDRO FERNANDEZ, ET AL. -->

EN BANC

G.R. No. 4382 August 20, 1908

THE UNITED STATES,Plaintiff-Appellee, vs. PEDRO FERNANDEZ, ( alias INFANTERIA) ET AL.,Defendants-Appellants.

Antero Soriano, for appellants.
Attorney-General Araneta, for appellee.

ARELLANO, C.J. :chanrobles virtual law library

By an information filed on the 14th of August, 1907, the following charges were preferred against the defendants herein:chanrobles virtual law library

That on the 30th of June, 1907, the accused broke into the dwelling house of the married couple, Sotero Austria and Arcadia Gendive, with whom they engaged in a fight, demanding that the latter surrender their money, and upon their refusal to give it up, the accused and seriously injured them and took possession of a pair of gold earrings worn by Arcadia. On leaving the house they bound Sotero Austria who, in consequence of his wounds, died about eight or nine hours latter.chanroblesvirtualawlibrary chanrobles virtual law library

The commission of the crime has been fully proven, as were also the results thereof; to wit, the death Sotero Austria and the injuries occasioned to Arcadia Gendive, from whom they took her earrings.chanroblesvirtualawlibrary chanrobles virtual law library

The responsibility of Pedro Fernandez, which is the only point now at issue, has also been proven beyond all reasonable doubt.chanroblesvirtualawlibrary chanrobles virtual law library

Arcadia Gendive testified as follows:chanrobles virtual law library

The man who was waiting below, named Pedro [pointing out one of the accused, Pedro Fernandez], stood on the second step of the staircase which is rather short, and another man [pointing out Victor Aranzazu], who was also downstairs, lighted another; at that moment Pedro fired his revolver and hit my husband. Victor again lighted a match and Pedro fired the second time. (P. 2.)chanrobles virtual law library

Following this, an unknown man, the first to attack her husband and who was assisted by Pedro and Victor, threw, the witness down in the corner of the house, and, covering her with a piece of matting, or petate, put his feet on her neck.

Afterwards [the witness continued] Victor [who had taken one of the children of the aggrieved parties downstairs with him] came up, lighted our lamp, and searched our house. I lifted a corner of the petate which covered me, and I saw Victor turn over our belongings; then it was that I manage to distinctly see the face of the man who had his foot on my throat, and who said to me: "Are you moving yet?", and I answered "No, sir." He then told me to give him my earrings, to which I replied, "Here you are, sir; have mercy upon me; spare my life for the sake of my children!" After taking my earrings they questioned me about the location of our money, and I told them we had none. When I said that, they squeezed my throat and said, "Tell us the truth, because the people of the barrio say that you have plenty of money." I told them that we did not have much money, and, without loosening the grasp on my neck, they said, "Tell us how much money you had on you on Thursday afternoon, when your son carried a bundle in his arms; undoubtedly you turned the money over to Lieutenant Colas." I was a great deal on account of the grip on my throat, and although it was a lie, I said "yes." Thereupon, Victor put out the light and the man who was grasping my throat also went down the stairs: I then managed to stand up little by little and get near the door in order to see what had become of my husband; I saw the men below kicking him and questioning him about the money, to which he answered we had none. They said to him, "It is said in the barrio that you discovered a treasure in your land in a vase the size of an oil can." My husband denied it, and they added, "Then how is it that your wife said that you turned over the money to Lieutenant Colas?" and my husband replied, "no, sir; the money has not been unearthed yet; it is still buried," and then they left. (P. 4.)

Cayetano Genova, a neighbor who came to their assistance on hearing Arcadia Gendive cry for help, desisted when the shot was fired and went to inform the lieutenant of the barrio of the occurrence. On returning, he found Sotero Austria bound and stretched out on the floor; the latter, on being questioned by the lieutenant as to who had injured him and whether or not he knew malefactors, replied that he recognized Pedro and Victor. (P. 40)chanrobles virtual law library

Ambrosio Campaña, a sergeant of police of Imus, to whom the wounded Sotero Austria was taken, testified that Austria had distinctly told him the names of Victor Aranzazu and Pedro Fernandez.chanroblesvirtualawlibrary chanrobles virtual law library

Dalmacio Genova, a roundsman on duty during the night of the occurrence, stated that he was on his rounds accompanied for a while by Pedro Fernandez; the latter was dressed in khaki like a Scout soldier, but at about 9 o' clock they separated; that the crime was committed at 11 o' clock, and when he proceeded to the house of Sotero Austria, in the company of the first lieutenant ask Austria who had broken into the house; Austria gave the names of Pedro Fernandez and Victor; the son of a certain Tito. (P. 29.)chanrobles virtual law library

Lucio Camayag testified that he was ordered to Dasmarinas to make a report of the occurrence, and that Pedro Fernandez was assigned as his companion; that when they passed in front of the witness's own house, Fernandez said that he would go and take off his khaki suit and leave it in the house, which he did; that, on arrival of the wounded man, Sotero Austria, at Dasmarinas, the councilor of that town asked Austria if he knew he broke into his house, and Austria replied that he knew Pedro (known as Pedro Olalia in the barrio) and Victor, a son of the constable Tito, and that Pedro was dressed in a khaki shirt, and this khaki shirt having been left by Pedro in the witness's house, the latter begun to suspect him, and went for the garment and delivered it to the second lieutenant of the barrio, they found blood stains on the body of it and on one of the sleeves.chanroblesvirtualawlibrary chanrobles virtual law library

Benito Austria, lieutenant of the barrio of Salitran, wherein the crime was committed, testified that soon after receiving the report of the occurrence he ordered that the victim be brought before him, and to his question in regard to the identity of the aggressors, the deceased replied that they were Pedro and Victor, the accused present at the trial. (P. 15.) On cross-examination, the witness was asked to state whether or not Sotero Austria, when answering him, was in a feeble state of mind; he said no, because the victim answered him at once. (P. 17.)chanrobles virtual law library

The Court of First Instance of Cavite rightly found the crime in question to be the complex one of robbery with homicide, punished by article 503 of the Penal Code, and sentenced Pedro Fernandez to imprisonment for life, to indemnify the heirs of the deceased in the sum of P500, and to pay one-half of the costs of the trial.chanroblesvirtualawlibrary chanrobles virtual law library

This case is now before us on appeal taken by Pedro Fernandez. Article 503 of the Penal Code prescribes that a person guilty of robbery with violence and intimidation of the person shall be punished with the penalty of cadena perpetua to death, if on account of, or on the occasion of the robbery, homicide results.chanroblesvirtualawlibrary chanrobles virtual law library

The second paragraph of article 80 of the same code provides that, where the law prescribes a punishment composed of two indivisible penalties, as in the present case, the following rules shall be observed in the application thereof.

(1) If an aggravating circumstance alone should have attended the deed, the higher penalty shall be applied; (2) if neither extenuating nor aggravating circumstances should have attended the deed, the lesser penalty shall be applied.

The lower court has imposed the lesser penalty. Yet it is obvious that two aggravating circumstances attended the commission of the crime, they being the fifteenth and twelfth circumstances enumerated in article 10 of the code, to wit, the commission of the crime at night and in the dwelling house of the victim, which, according to the first rule quoted above, make it necessary that the highest penalty be imposed.chanroblesvirtualawlibrary chanrobles virtual law library

We, therefore, modify in this point the judgment appealed from, and sentence Pedro Fernandez to suffer the penalty of death, to be carried out in the form recently provided by law, on the date, and place to be properly designated, to the payment of the costs of this instance, and affirm the judgment in all other respects. So ordered.chanroblesvirtualawlibrary chanrobles virtual law library

Torres, Mapa, Carson, Willard and Tracey, JJ., concur.