SUPREME COURT DECISIONS

PLEASE CLICK HERE FOR THE LATEST ➔ SUPREME COURT DECISIONS

G.R. No. L-7657           March 6, 1914
AMBROSIO TIEMPO vs. VIUDA E HIJOS DE PLACIDO REYES, ET AL. -->

EN BANC

G.R. No. L-7657 March 6, 1914

AMBROSIO TIEMPO, Plaintiff-Appellant, vs. VIUDA E HIJOS DE PLACIDO REYES, SOCIEDAD COLECTIVA, ET AL., Defendants-Appellees.

Filemon Sotto for appellant.
Mariano Abejuela for appellees.

CARSON, J. :chanrobles virtual law library

This is an appeal an order of the Court of First Instance of Misamis, sustaining a demurrer to a complaint, wherein plaintiff sought relief from a judgment of a justice of the peace, alleging that judgment was void for lack of jurisdiction.chanroblesvirtualawlibrary chanrobles virtual law library

Plaintiff in this action alleges that the justice of the peace assumed jurisdiction to hear and decide a complaint, wherein plaintiff sought possession of certain real estate, alleging that by virtue of a contract for the sale thereof, under the terms of which the vendor retained the right to repurchase prior to a certain date ( venta con pacto de retro), he had become the owner of this real estate, the vendor having failed to exercise his right to repurchase within the time stipulated. The justice of the peace assumed jurisdiction on the ground that the facts set forth gave the vendor the right to an action in his court for the possession of the land, under the provisions of section 80 of Act No. 190.chanroblesvirtualawlibrary chanrobles virtual law library

The trial judge, in the case at bar, was of opinion that the justice of the peace of jurisdiction to hear and decide the case, and on that ground sustained the demurrer to the complaint. But this court, in the case of Falcon vs. Barretto (26 Phil. Rep., 72), held that justices of the peace have no jurisdiction to hear and decide cases in summary proceedings as provided in section 80 of Act No. 190, wherein plaintiff seeks possession of land by virtue of alleged rights of ownership acquired under the terms of deeds of sale with the right to repurchase ( ventas con pacto de retro).chanroblesvirtualawlibrary chanrobles virtual law library

It is clear that under the ruling in that case the justice of the peace had no jurisdiction to enter the judgment, relief from which is sought in the at bar, and that the order entered in the court below, sustaining the demurrer to the complaint, should be set aside.chanroblesvirtualawlibrary chanrobles virtual law library

Arellano, C.J., Moreland, Trent and Araullo, JJ., concur.