SUPREME COURT DECISIONS

PLEASE CLICK HERE FOR THE LATEST ➔ SUPREME COURT DECISIONS

G.R. No. 17714 May 31, 1922
IN RE: JESUS DE LEON. IGNACIA DIAZ vs. ANA DE LEON -->

EN BANC

G.R. No. 17714 May 31, 1922

In the mater of the estate of Jesus de Leon.
IGNACIA DIAZ, Petitioner-Appellant, vs. ANA DE LEON, opponent-appellee.

Montinola, Montinola & Hontiveros and Jose Lopez Vito for appellant.
Francisco A. Delgado, Powell & Hill and Padilla & Treñas for appellee.

ROMUALDEZ, J.:

The only question raised in this case is whether or to the will executed by Jesus de Leon, now, was revoked by him.chanroblesvirtualawlibrary chanrobles virtual law library

The petitioner denies such revocation, while the contestant affirms the same by alleging that the testator revoked his will by destroying it, and by executing another will expressly revoking the former.chanroblesvirtualawlibrary chanrobles virtual law library

We find that the second will Exhibit 1 executed by the deceased is not cloth with all the necessary requisites to constitute a sufficient revocation.chanroblesvirtualawlibrary chanrobles virtual law library

But according to the statute governing the subject in this jurisdiction, the destruction of a will animo revocandi constitutes, in itself, a sufficient revocation. (Sec. 623, Code of Civil Procedure.)chanrobles virtual law library

From the evidence submitted in this case, it appears that the testator, shortly after the execution of the first will in question, asked that the same be returned to him. The instrument was returned to the testator who ordered his servant to tear the document. This was done in his presence and before a nurse who testified to this effect. After some time, the testator, being asked by Dr. Cornelio Mapa about the will, said that it had been destroyed.chanroblesvirtualawlibrary chanrobles virtual law library

The intention of revoking the will is manifest from the established fact that the testator was anxious to withdraw or change the provisions he had made in his first will. This fact is disclosed by the testator's own statements to the witnesses Canto and the Mother Superior of the Hospital where he was confined.chanroblesvirtualawlibrary chanrobles virtual law library

The original will herein presented for probate having been destroyed with animo revocandi, cannot now be probated as the will and last testament of Jesus de Leon.chanroblesvirtualawlibrary chanrobles virtual law library

Judgement is affirmed with costs against the petitioner. So ordered.

Araullo, C.J., Malcolm, Avanceña, Ostrand and Johns, JJ., concur.
Villamor, J., took no part.