ChanRobles Virtual law Library
SUPREME COURT DECISIONS
PLEASE CLICK HERE FOR THE LATEST ➔ SUPREME COURT DECISIONS
EN BANC
G.R. No. L-46065 August 9, 1938
PABLO C. CORTES, ET AL. Petitioners, vs. SIXTO DE LA COSTA, Judge of First Instance of Rizal, ET AL., Respondents.
M.A. Zarcal for petitioners.
Felix Blanco in his own behalf.
Jose D. Villena for other respondents.
STREET,LAUREL, J.: chanrobles virtual law library
This is a petition for mandamus to compel the respondent judge of the Court of First Instance of Rizal to proceed with the hearing of the election contest filed against the other respondents by the petitioners herein. Petitioner Pablo C. Cortes and respondents Deogracias Luciano, Sabino Gutierrez, and Irineo Aviado were candidates, in the elections held on December 14, 1937, for the office of municipal vice-mayor of Makati, Rizal. The other petitioners and the other respondents, except the respondent judge, were candidates, in the same elections, for the office of councilor, in the same municipality and province. A motion of protest was filed in time by the petitioners herein but was dismissed by the respondent judge, upon motion by the protestees (the other respondent herein), on the ground of failure to allege the jurisdictional fact that the said protestees were proclaimed elected candidates. Reconsideration of the order of dismissal was sought but was refused.chanroblesvirtualawlibrary chanrobles virtual law library
The respondent judge correctly states that failure to allege in the motion of protest that the protestees were proclaimed elected candidates is fatal to the protest. (Manalo vs. Sevilla, 24 Phil., 609; Ferrer vs. Gutierrez David and Lucot, 43 Phil., 795; Yumul vs. Palma, 52 Phil., 412; Saldana vs. Consunji, 52 Phil., 433.) An examination of the motion of protest, however, shows that it contains allegations from which the jurisdictional fact of proclamation may be clearly inferred. In paragraph 4 of the motion, it is alleged:
4. Que, en la proclamacion verificada por la Junta Municipal de Escrutinio en 18 de diciembre de 1937, aparacen los siguientes votos a favor de los recurrentes y recurridos respectivamente:
RECURRENTES
Votes Pablo C. Cortes ............................................................................... 1,773 Marcos Concepcion ........................................................................ 1,009 Dionisio Afable ................................................................................ 996 Tomas Gonzalez ............................................................................. 1,008 Ventura Canilao .............................................................................. 900 Fidel Dionisio ................................................................................... 965 Tomas Estacio ................................................................................ 845 Maximo Arcangel ............................................................................. 750 Monico Policarpio ............................................................................ 796 RECURRIDOS
Deogracias Luciano ........................................................................ 2,017 Sabino Gutierrez ............................................................................... 610 Irineo Aviado ..................................................................................... 662 Felix Blanco ...................................................................................... 1,781 Diego Benito .................................................................................... 1,681 Amado E. Diaz ................................................................................. 1,628 Martin Santos .................................................................................. 1,478 Pedro Santiago ............................................................................... 1,369 Luis Anastacio ................................................................................ 1,365 Eliseo Viray ..................................................................................... 1,164 Jose Cunanan ................................................................................ 1,095
From the foregoing portion of the motion of protest, it is obvious that the victorious candidates were the protestees, except Sabino Gutierrez and Irineo Aviado, and that said candidates were duly proclaimed. The language used could have been more clear and precise but the fact of proclamation of the protestees is there. Precision in pleadings is desirable but it is not to be strictly required. A single fact may be alleged in different ways with the same effect.chanroblesvirtualawlibrary chanrobles virtual law library
The writ prayed for is hereby granted, without any pronouncement regarding costs. So ordered.
Avance�a, C.J., Villa-Real, Aba Santos, Imperial, Diaz and Concepcion, JJ., concur.