SUPREME COURT DECISIONS

Search for www.chanrobles.com

PLEASE CLICK HERE FOR THE LATEST ➔ SUPREME COURT DECISIONS

EN BANC

G.R. No. L-46021 June 27, 1938

MAMERTO FERRARIS, Petitioner, vs. SOTERO RODAS, Judge of First Instance of Occidental Negros, and VICENTE FERRARIS, Respondents.

Quirico Abeto and Juan S. Aritao for petitioner.
Arrieta, Lacson and Amante for respondent Ferraris.
No appearance for respondent judge.

AVANCE�A, C.J.: chanrobles virtual law library

In the testamentary proceedings of the deceased Victorio Ferraris, case No. 7054 of the Court of First Instance of Occidental Negros the administratrix leased the participation of the estate in the hacienda Talab-an for a period of three years to Mamerto Ferraris. The contract of lease was registered on August 10, 1937. On November 10, of the same year, Vicente Ferraris applied for the lease of the same participation in the hacienda Talab-an which application was opposed by the administratrix as she had already leased said participation of Mamerto Ferraris. On January 15, of the following year, 1938 the court without giving the opposition an opportunity to adduce evidence in its favor, issued an order even date leasing one-half of the hacienda Talab-an to Vicente Ferraris.chanroblesvirtualawlibrary chanrobles virtual law library

This petition for certiorari is filed to declare null and void the order of the court of January 15, 1938 on the allegation that the court lacked jurisdiction to issue said order.chanroblesvirtualawlibrary chanrobles virtual law library

It is not disputed that the lease of the participation of the estate in the hacienda Talab-an, executed by the administratrix, is legal, as it is in fact, because the lease being a mere act of administration, the administratrix could alone legally enter into such a contract with Mamerto Ferraris. If such is the case, irrespective of whether or not the court had jurisdiction to issue said order, it is obvious that, if it had such jurisdiction, it committed an abuse thereof by going against the legal effects of a lease validly and duly entered into by the administratrix with Mamerto Ferraris, without said lease having been previously declared void through proper proceedings.chanroblesvirtualawlibrary chanrobles virtual law library

The order of the court of January 15, 1938 is hereby declared void with costs to the respondent Vicente Ferraris. So ordered.

Villa-Real, Abad Santos, Imperial, Diaz, Laurel and Concepcion, JJ., concur.