SUPREME COURT DECISIONS

Search for www.chanrobles.com

PLEASE CLICK HERE FOR THE LATEST ➔ SUPREME COURT DECISIONS

EN BANC

G.R. No. L-28202      November 10, 1967

F.E.F. REMOTIGUE, LUIS V. DIORES I.V. BINAMIRA, GALICANO BARREDA, GENEROSO PACQUIAO, RIZALINO ANDRINO, CORNELIO CAPAROSO, EDUARDO GALLARDE, FEDERICO ALCUIZAR and NACIONALISTA PARTY CEBU CHAPTER Petitioners, vs. HON. SERGIO OSMEÑA, JR., Respondent.

J. Binamin for petitioners.
A. Meer for respondent.
C. Fernandez as amicus curiae.

R E S O L U T I O Nchanrobles virtual law library

PER CURIAM:chanrobles virtual law library

Upon consideration of the complaint in original case G.R. No. L-28202, entitled "F. E. F. Remotigue, et al. vs. Hon. Sergio Osmeña, Jr.," and of the answer filed by the defendant therein, as well as the arguments adduced by the parties at the hearing held on November 6, 1967, and the memorandum filed by the plaintiffs, and it appearing:chanrobles virtual law library

1. That the main issue raised by the pleadings is the qualification of defendant Sergio Osmeña, Jr. to be a candidate for the office of City Mayor of Cebu City in the general elections to be held on November 14, 1967;chanrobles virtual law library

2. That it is the stand of the plaintiffs that defendant Sergio Osmeña, Jr. is not qualified to run for the office of City Mayor of Cebu City because he filed his certificate of candidacy for the office of City Mayor without first having resigned from his office as Senator, in violation of Section 9 of the Charter of Cebu City which provides as follows:

Sec. 9. GENERAL QUALIFICATIONS OF ELECTIVE OFFICIALS - in addition to any special qualifications prescribed by this Charter, all elective officers of the City shall be qualified and registered voter of the City, and shall hold no other public office except that of notary public or membership in the armed forces reserve, nor any other employment with the city or with the National Government or any province or municipality.

3. That the plaintiffs claim that the candidacy of defendant Sergio Osmeña, Jr. is prejudicial to their interests and to the interests of the persons they represent;chanrobles virtual law library

4. That in the complaint - which is captioned as "For Injunction and Declaratory Relief " - the plaintiffs pray this Court to declare defendant Sergio Osmeña, Jr. disqualified to run for the office of City Mayor of Cebu City and to declare his certificate of candidacy illegal, null and void and without force and effect, and also to restrain him from running as City Mayor of Cebu City and from resigning from his office as Senator;chanrobles virtual law library

5. That the determination, in this case, of the issue thus raised by the plaintiffs would amount to a declaratory judgment and a judgment in an original action for injunction, which are matters that are not within the original exclusive jurisdiction of this Court;chanrobles virtual law library

6. That neither would the allegations in the complaint warrant the treatment of the action brought herein as one for a petition for certiorari or prohibition, or any other action that is within the original and exclusive jurisdiction of this Court;chanrobles virtual law library

The Court RESOLVED that the herein complaint of plaintiffs be, as it is hereby, DISMISSED, with cost against the plaintiffs. It is so ordered.