ChanRobles Virtual law Library




SUPREME COURT DECISIONS

google search for chanrobles.comSearch for www.chanrobles.com

PLEASE CLICK HERE FOR THE LATEST ➔ SUPREME COURT DECISIONS





www.chanrobles.com

FIRST DIVISION

G.R. No. L-43471 September 30, 1978

JOSE TORALDE, Petitioner, vs. THE WORKMEN'S COMPENSATION COMMISSION and ORBE LINES, represented by ORLANDO TAN, Manager, Respondents.

Martin Badong, Jr. for petitioner.chanrobles virtual law library

Luis P. Bisana for private respondent.chanrobles virtual law library

E. V. Miguel for respondent WCC.

MAKASIAR, J.:

Petition for review of the decision of the Workmen's Compensation Commission dated January 14, 1976 reversing the award of the Workmen's Compensation Unit, Regional Office No. VI.chanroblesvirtualawlibrary chanrobles virtual law library

Claimant Jose Toralde was employed by respondent Orbe Lines sometime in 1969 as bus driver. As such driver he worked five days a week from 3:00 A.M. up to 9:00 P.M. until martial law was declared on September 21, 1972 when he started reporting for work at 4:00 A.M. On November 8,1973, he submitted himself at the Camarines Sur Provincial Hospital for a chest X-Ray examination and was found afflicted with PTB. He was treated at the same hospital for a month after which he resumed his work. Again claimant submitted himself for treatment of PTB in 1974 to Dr. Magno Jamito Dr. Ramon Prado and Dr. Semana In July, 1974, he stopped working completely because his illness worsened and was treated for six months by Dr. Ramon Prado and Dr. Lope Semana.chanroblesvirtualawlibrary chanrobles virtual law library

On March 26, 1975 petitioner filed his claim for compensation with the Workmen's Compensation Unit, Regional Office No. VI, Naga City. Said Regional Office rendered a decision awarding compensation to petitioner in the total sum of P6,000.00 plus P2,511.00 as reimbursement of medical expenses and attorney's fee of P300.00 and administrative fee of P61.00. This award was however reversed by the Workmen's Compensation Commission sitting en banc for the following reasons:

It is indubitable that he stopped working not because of any disabling illness but because the bus he was driving figured in an ac accident and there was no bus for him to drive. That he was not disabled from labor by his PTB is likewise amply demonstrated by the fact that since one month after he stopped working with the respondent up to the present, he was driving a passenger-jeepney. The injuries or diseases that are compensable are those which produces disability and affect the earning power of the employee. As long as the employee is able to work and receives his pay even he is suffering from illness, he is not entitled to compensation (General Azucarera Don Pedro vs. De Leon, G. R. No. L-9449, July 24, 1959).

It may be true that once in a while petitioner was seen driving the passenger-jeepney jeepney of his father-in-law, yet there was no proof that claimant was already gainfully employed as driver of said passenger-jeepney. He said that he was forced to drive a passenger-jeepney once in a while because he needed money for his medicines.chanroblesvirtualawlibrary chanrobles virtual law library

The nature and condition of the work of petitioner, starting for work as early as 3:00 o'clock in the morning up to 9:00 o'clock in the evening, exposed to the early morning and late evening cold as well as to the heat of the engine and the sun during the whole day, and breathing the polluted air of dusty roads, would certainly weaken the bodily resistance of petitioner and make him susceptible to sickness. Petitioner's illness of PTB was presumptively caused and aggravated by his work, which presumption has not been rebutted by substantial proof to the contrary, reinforced as it is by medical examination and treatment. Claimant is therefore entitled to compensation.chanroblesvirtualawlibrary chanrobles virtual law library

WHEREFORE, THE JUDGMENT OF RESPONDENT WORKMEN'S COMPENSATION COMMISSION IS HEREBY REVERSED AND RESPONDENT ORBE LINES, REPRESENTED BY ORLANDO TAN, IS HEREBY DIRECTED chanrobles virtual law library

A. TO PAY CLAIMANT

(1) THE SUM OF SIX THOUSAND (P6,000.00) PESOS AS DISABILITY COMPENSATION; chanrobles virtual law library

(2) THE AMOUNT OF TWO THOUSAND FIVE HUNDRED ELEVEN (P2,511.00) PESOS AS REIMBURSEMENT FOR HIS MEDICAL EXPENSES DU LY SUPPORTED BY PROPER RECEIPTS; AND chanrobles virtual law library

(3) ATTORNEY'S FEES EQUIVALENT TO 10% OF THE RECOVERABLE AMOUNT.

B. TO PROVIDE CLAIMANT WITH SUCH MEDICAL, SURGICAL AND HOSPITAL SERVICES, APPLIANCES AND SUPPLIES AS THE NATURE OF HIS DISABILITY AND THE PROGRESS OF HIS RECOVERY MAY REQUIRE AND THAT WHICH WILL PROMOTE HIS EARLY RESTORATION TO THE MAXIMUM LEVEL OF HIS PHYSICAL CAPACITY, AND chanrobles virtual law library

C. TO PAY P61.00 AS ADMINISTRATIVE FEE .chanroblesvirtualawlibrarychanrobles virtual law library

SO ORDERED.

Teehankee (Chairman), Muñoz Palma , Fernandez and Guerrero, JJ., concur.




























chanrobles.com





ChanRobles Legal Resources:

ChanRobles On-Line Bar Review

ChanRobles Internet Bar Review : www.chanroblesbar.com

ChanRobles MCLE On-line

ChanRobles Lawnet Inc. - ChanRobles MCLE On-line : www.chanroblesmcleonline.com