ChanRobles Virtual law Library




SUPREME COURT DECISIONS

google search for chanrobles.comSearch for www.chanrobles.com

PLEASE CLICK HERE FOR THE LATEST ➔ SUPREME COURT DECISIONS





www.chanrobles.com


 

FIRST DIVISION

[A.C. No. 2519. August 29, 2000]

TEODORO R. RIVERA, ANTONIO D. AQUINO and FELIXBERTO D. AQUINO, complainants, vs. ATTY. SERGIO ANGELES, Respondent.

R E S O L U T I O N

YNARES-SANTIAGO, J.: chanrobles virtual law library

On March 25, 1983, complainants filed a Complaint for Disbarment against Atty. Sergio Angeles on the grounds of Deceit and Malpractice. The Affidavit-Complaint1 reads as follows: chanrobles virtual law library

1..... The undersigned are plaintiffs in Civil Cases Nos. Q-12841 and Q-13128 of the Court of First Instance of Rizal, Branch V at Quezon City; chanrobles virtual law library

2..... Atty. Sergio Angeles is their counsel of record in the said cases and his office is located at Suite 335, URC Building, 2123 Espaa, Manila; chanrobles virtual law library

3..... That after receiving favorable decision from the CFI on May 21, 1973 and sustained by the Court of Appeals and the Supreme Court an alias writ of execution was issued in said cases; chanrobles virtual law library

4..... That in the first week of January 1983 we obtained from the CFI a sheriffs return, dated November 10, 1982, stating that no leviable property can be found in the premises of the defendants; chanrobles virtual law library

5..... That on or before January 13, 1983, we learned that Mr. Rodolfo M. Silva, one of the defendants in said cases had already given Atty. Angeles a partial settlement of the judgment in the amount of P42,999.00 (as evidenced by xerox copies of Partial Settlement of Judgment dated September 21, 1982 and Receipt of Payment dated September 22, 1982, hereto attached as Annexes A and B, respectively), without our knowledge. chanrobles virtual law library

6..... That Atty. Sergio Angeles never informed the undersigned of the amount of P42,999.00 he received from Mr. Silva nor remitted to them even a part of that amount; chanrobles virtual law library

7..... That a demand letter was sent to Atty. Sergio Angeles which was received by him on February 17, 1983, but as of this date the undersigned have not yet received any reply. (See Exhibit C and D attached). chanrobles virtual law library

In his Comment filed on June 21, 1983, respondent denied the accusations and stated that he has the right to retain the said amount of P42,999.00 and to apply the same to professional fees due him under the subsequent agreement first with complainant Teodoro Rivera and later with Mrs. Dely Dimson Rivera as embodied in the Deed of Assignment (Annex 8)2 or under the previous agreement of P20% of P206,000.00. chanrobles virtual law library

Complainants, in their Reply,3 vehemently denied the assignment of their rights to respondent. chanrobles virtual law library

Thereafter, this case was referred to the Solicitor General for investigation, report and recommendation in our Resolution dated November 21, 1983. The Office of the Solicitor General considered this case submitted for resolution on April 30, 1985 by declaring respondents right to present evidence as considered waived due to the latters failure to appear on the scheduled hearings. However, the records from said Office do not show any resolution. chanrobles virtual law library

In October 1998, the Integrated Bar of the Philippines issued an Order requiring the parties to manifest whether or not they are still interested in prosecuting this case, or whether supervening events have transpired which render this case moot and academic or otherwise. The copy of said Order sent to the complainants was received by their counsel on October 30, 1998 while the copy to the respondent was returned unclaimed. chanrobles virtual law library

Investigating Commissioner Julio C. Elamparo submitted his report on April 29, 1999 finding respondent Atty. Sergio Angeles guilty of violating the Code of Professional Responsibility specifically Rule 1.01, Canon 16 and Rule 16.01 thereof and recommends his indefinite suspension from the practice of law. chanrobles virtual law library

The Board of Governors of the Integrated Bar of the Philippines on June 19, 1999, issued a resolution, the decretal portion of which reads: chanrobles virtual law library

RESOLUTION NO. XIII-99-151 chanrobles virtual law library

Adm. Case No. 2519 chanrobles virtual law library

Teodoro R. Rivera, et al. vs. chanrobles virtual law library

Atty. Sergio Angeles chanrobles virtual law library

RESOLVED to ADOPT and APPROVE, as it is hereby ADOPTED and APPROVED, the Report and Recommendation of the Investigating Commissioner in the above-entitled case, herein made part of this Resolution/Decision as Annex A; and, finding the recommendation fully supported by the evidence on record and the applicable laws and rules, with an amendment that Atty. Sergio Angeles is SUSPENDED from the practice of law for ONE (1) YEAR for his having been found guilty of practicing deceit in dealing with his client. chanrobles virtual law library

The Court finds merit in the recommendation of the Integrated Bar of the Philippines. Respondents act of deceit and malpractice indubitably demonstrated his failure to live up to his sworn duties as a lawyer. The Supreme Court repeatedly stressed the importance of integrity and good moral character as part of a lawyers equipment in the practice of his profession.4 For it cannot be denied that the respect of litigants for the profession is inexorably diminished whenever a member of the Bar betrays their trust and confidence.5 chanrobles virtual law library

The Court is not oblivious of the right of a lawyer to be paid for the legal services he has extended to his client but such right should not be exercised whimsically by appropriating to himself the money intended for his clients. There should never be an instance where the victor in litigation loses everything he won to the fees of his own lawyer. chanrobles virtual law library

WHEREFORE, respondent Atty. Sergio Angeles, is SUSPENDED from the practice of law for ONE (1) YEAR for having been found guilty of practicing deceit in dealing with his client. chanrobles virtual law library

This Resolution shall take effect immediately and copies thereof furnished the Office of the Bar Confidant, Integrated Bar of the Philippines and appended to respondents personal record. chanrobles virtual law library

SO ORDERED. chanrobles virtual law library

Davide, Jr., C.J., (Chairman), Puno, Kapunan, and Pardo, JJ., concur.



Endnotes:

1 Rollo, p. 1.

2 Annex 7, Unsigned Deed of Assignment; Rollo, p. 45.

3 Reply, Rollo, pp. 62 and 88.

4 Fernandez v. Grecia, A.C. No. 3694, June 17, 1993, 223 SCRA 425.

5 Busios v. Ricafort, A.C. No. 4349, December 22, 1997, 283 SCRA 407.




























chanrobles.com





ChanRobles Legal Resources:

ChanRobles On-Line Bar Review

ChanRobles Internet Bar Review : www.chanroblesbar.com

ChanRobles MCLE On-line

ChanRobles Lawnet Inc. - ChanRobles MCLE On-line : www.chanroblesmcleonline.com