SUPREME COURT DECISIONS

google search for chanrobles.comSearch for www.chanrobles.com


Endnotes:

1 Diaz-Duarte v. Ong, 358 Phil. 876, 885 [1998].

2 In Civil Case No. 40615, RTC Pasig. Solid Homes, Inc. v. Court of Appeals, 235 SCRA 299 [1994].

3 P. D. No. 1529.

4 Rule 13, Section 14, Revised Rules of Court; Po Lam v. Court of Appeals, G. R. No. 116220, December 6, 2000.

5 Gochan v. Young, G. R. No. 131889, March 12, 2001; Villanueva v. Court of Appeals, 346 Phil. 289, 302 [1997].

6 Alberto v. Court of Appeals, 334 SCRA 756, 772 [2000]. A notice of lis pendens is proper in the following cases:

a) An action to recover possession of real estate;

b) An action to quiet title thereto;

c) An action to remove clouds thereon;

d) An action for partition; and

e) Any other proceedings of any kind in Court directly affecting the title to the land or the use or occupation thereof or the buildings thereon. (Magdalena Homeowners Association, Inc. v. Court of Appeals, 184 SCRA 325, 329-330 [1990]).

7 Viewmaster Construction Corporation v. Maulit, 326 SCRA 821, 829-830 [2000], citing Villanueva v. Court of Appeals, supra, Note 5.

8 Motion for Reconsideration, Rollo, pp. 469-518, at p. 485.

9 Solid Homes, Inc. v. Court of Appeals, 235 SCRA 299, 300 [1994].

10 Traders Royal Bank v. Court of Appeals; and Capay v. Santos, 315 SCRA 190, 202 [1999], citing Tenio-Obsequio v. Court of Appeals, 230 SCRA 550 [1994].

11 Vda. de Medina v. Cruz, 161 SCRA 36, 44 [1988].

12 Tenio-Obsequio v. Court of Appeals, supra, Note 10; Republic v. Intermediate Appellate Court, 209 SCRA 90, 101-102 [1992].

13 327 Phil. 944, 955 [1996].

14 Citing Luzon Brokerage Co., Inc. v. Maritime Building Co., Inc., 150-B Phil. 264 [1972]; Jacinto v. Kaparaz, 209 SCRA 246, 254 [1992]; Visayan Sawmill Co., Inc. v. Court of Appeals, 219 SCRA 378, 389 [1993]; Pingol v. Court of Appeals, 226 SCRA 118, 126 [1993]; Dawson v. Register of Deeds, 356 Phil. 1037, 1045 [1998].

15 Luzon Brokerage Co., Inc. v. Maritime Building Co., Inc., supra, Note 14.

16 Rule 39, Section 1, Revised Rules of Court.

17 Buaya v. Stronghold Insurance Co., Inc., G. R. No. 139020, October 11, 2000, citing Rubio v. MTCC, Br. 3, Cagayan de Oro City, 322 Phil. 171, 193-194 [1996]; Soco v. Court of Appeals, 331 Phil. 753, 760 [1996].

18 Docketed as G. R. No. 135016.

19 See Solid Homes, Inc. v. Court of Appeals, 235 SCRA 299 [1994].

20 Rule 39, Section 1, Revised Rules of Court; Carreon v. Buissan, 162 Phil. 77, 83 [1976].

21 The land involved is a 35.53 hectare lot, located at the outskirts of Marikina City, adjacent to the Loyola Grand Villa Subdivision, Ayala Heights Subdivision and Capitol Golf and Country Club, Quezon City (Solid Homes, Inc. Memorandum, dated December 10, 2000, pp. 724-725) (Rollo, pp. 724-809).




chanrobles.com



ChanRobles Professional Review, Inc.

ChanRobles Professional Review, Inc. : www.chanroblesprofessionalreview.com
ChanRobles On-Line Bar Review

ChanRobles Internet Bar Review : www.chanroblesbar.com
ChanRobles CPA Review Online

ChanRobles CPALE Review Online : www.chanroblescpareviewonline.com
ChanRobles Special Lecture Series

ChanRobles Special Lecture Series - Memory Man : www.chanroblesbar.com/memoryman