ChanRobles Virtual law Library

[ G.R. No. 124791. August 30, 1999]

JOSE RAMON CARCELLAR vs. CA, et al.

SECOND DIVISION

Gentlemen:

Quoted hereunder, for your information, is a resolution of this court dated AUG 30, 1999.

G.R. No. 124791 (Jose Ramon Carcellar vs. Court of Appeals, et al.)

Considering the motion of private respondent for leave to admit its urgent motion for reconsideration of the resolution of 7 April 1999 which denied with finality its motion for reconsideration of the decision dated 10 February 1999 as well as the aforesaid urgent motion for reconsideration, and it appearing that said motion for reconsideration partakes of the nature of a second motion for reconsideration of the decision of 10 February 1999, the Court RESOLVES to DENY both motions for lack of merit and for being prohibited pleadings pursuant to Section 2, Rule 52, in relation to Section 4, Rule 56 of the 1997 Rules of Civil Procedure, as amended.

Upon motion of petitioner dated 29 June 1999 and 20 August 1999, let ENTRY OF FINAL JUDGMENT be made in due course. No further pleadings or motions shall be entertained in this case. Accordingly, the manifestation of private respondent dated 14 July 1999 stating that petitioner's request for entry of judgment is premature is NOTED WITHOUT ACTION.

Very truly yours,

(Sgd.) TOMASITA M. DRIS
Clerk of Court

Back to Home | Back to Main

CLICK HERE FOR THE LATEST SUPREME COURT JURISPRUDENCE