ChanRobles Virtual law Library
[G.R. No. 134320.August 17, 1999]
NAJIB A. MALDISA vs. COMELEC, et. al.
EN BANC
Gentlemen :
Quoted hereunder, for your information, is a resolution of this Court dated AUG 17, 1999.
G.R. No. 134320(Najib A. Maldisa vs. Commission on Elections, et. al.)
Acting on the pending incidents the Court Resolved to NOTE (a) petitioner's Manifestation and Motion for Correction of Clerical Errors in the June 8, 1999, Resolution dated 27 July 1999; (b) private respondents' Brief Comment on the said Manifestation and Motion, dated 2 August 1999; and (c) petitioner's Manifestation and Supplemental Motion for Clarification of the June 8, 1999 Resolution, dated 6 August 1999.
The Court further Resolved to RULE that there is nothing to correct in the resolution of 8 June 1999.The errors are not in the "wordings" of the resolution, but in the understanding thereof by petitioner.
Nevertheless, since the Commission on Elections is in a quandary as to what it should do, the Court finally Resolved to declare that the logical consequence of the dismissal of the petition in this case is the recognition that the Commission en banc committed no grave abuse of discretion in setting for hearing the motion for reconsideration.
Very truly yours,
LUZVIMINDA D. PUNO
Clerk of Court
(Sgd.) MA. LUISA D. VILLARAMA
Asst. Clerk of Court
HERE FOR THE LATEST SUPREME COURT JURISPRUDENCE
PHILIPPINE SUPREME COURT DECISIONS
QUICK SEARCH
