ChanRobles Virtual law Library

[ G.R. No. 138683. August 16, 1999]

PHILIPPINE AUTOMOTIVE MFG. CORP. et al. vs. RODRIGO JOSE B. PAU.

SECOND DIVISION

Gentlemen:

Quoted hereunder, for your information, is a resolution of this Court dated AUG 16, 1999.

G.R. No. 138683 (Philippine Automotive Manufacturing Corporation, et al. vs. Rodrigo Jose B. Pau.)

In accordance with Rule 45 in relation to Rule 56 and other pertinent provisions of the 1997 Rules of Civil Procedure, as amended, governing appeals by certiorari to the Supreme Court, only petitions which are accompanied by or comply strictly with the requirements specified therein shall be entertained. On the basis thereof, the Court RESOLVES to DENY the petition for review on certiorari for being insufficient n form due to lack of a proper verification of the petition in accordance with Section 4, Rule 7 in relation to Section 1, Rule 45 since affiant failed to state that the allegations in the petition are true and correct of his knowledge and belief, as a consequence of which the petition is treated as an unsigned pleading which under Section 3, Rule 7, produces no legal effect.

The appearance of Attys. Emiterio C. Manibog, Jr. and Emerico de Guzman of Abello Concepcion Regala & Cruz as counsel for petitioners with request to be furnished with copies of court processes in this case at 5th Floor, ACCRA Bldg., 122 Gamboa St, Legaspi Village, Makati City, is NOTED.

Very truly yours,

TOMASITA M. DRIS
Clerk of Court

Back to Home | Back to Main

CLICK HERE FOR THE LATEST SUPREME COURT JURISPRUDENCE