ChanRobles Virtual law Library
[ G.R. No. 139072. August 4, 1999]
D.S.L. INDUSTRIES/DANILO S. LABAO vs. COURT OF APPEALS, et al.
SECOND DIVISION
Gentlemen:
Quoted hereunder, for your information, is a resolution of this Court dated AUG. 4, 1999.
G.R. No. 139072 (D.S.L. Industries/Danilo S. Labao vs. Court of Appeals, et al.)
In accordance with Rule 65 in relation to Rule 46, Rule 56 and other pertinent provisions of the 1997 Rules of Civil Procedure, as amended, governing petitions for certiorari, prohibition and mandamus filed with the Supreme Court, only petitions which are accompanied by or comply strictly with the requirements specified therein shall be entertained. On the basis thereof, the Court RESOLVES to DISMISS the petition for certiorari for petitioner's failure to:
a) file the petition within the period provided in Section 4, Rule 65;
b) timely pay the prescribed legal fees and deposit for costs in accordance with Section 3, Rule 46 in relation to Section 2, Rule 56; and
c) submit a certification against forum shopping duly signed and executed by petitioner himself in accordance with Section 5, Rule 7, Section 1, Rule 65, Section 3, Rule 46 in relation to Section 2, Rule 56.
Very truly yours,
(Sgd.) TOMASITA MAGAY-DRIS
Clerk of Court
HERE FOR THE LATEST SUPREME COURT JURISPRUDENCE
PHILIPPINE SUPREME COURT DECISIONS
QUICK SEARCH