ChanRobles Virtual law Library

[ G.R. No. 136204. January 18, 1999]

ROSARIO DEL ROSARIO vs. FELICIANA MORENO SUPLEO, et al.

SECOND DIVISION

Gentlemen:

Quoted hereunder, for your information, is a resolution of this Court dated JAN 18, 1999.

G.R. No. 136204 (Rosario del Rosario vs. Feliciana Moreno Supleo assisted by her husband Andres Supleo vs. Court of Appeals, et al.)

The motion of the petitioner for an extension of thirty (30) days within which to file a petition for review on certiorari is GRANTED provided that this is the LAST extension, counted from the expiration of the reglementary period and conditioned upon the timeliness of the filing of the said motion and the compliance with the requisites for its filing.

Considering the allegations, issues and arguments adduced in the petition for review on certiorari, the Court RESOLVES to DENY the petition, the issues raised being essentially factual and there being no sufficient showing that the findings of the Court of Appeals are not supported by the requisite quantum of evidence or that said court had committed any reversible error in the questioned judgment.

Very truly yours,

TOMASITA M. DRIS

Clerk of Court

Back to Home | Back to Main

CLICK HERE FOR THE LATEST SUPREME COURT JURISPRUDENCE