ChanRobles Virtual law Library
[ G.R. No. 138630. July 12, 1999]
FE REMY CAJULAO vs. CENTRAL AZUCARERA DE TARLAC.
SECOND DIVISION
Gentlemen:
Quoted hereunder, for your information, is a resolution of this Court dated JUL 12, 1999.
G.R. No. 138630 (Fe Remy Cajulao vs. Central Azucarera de Tarlac)
In accordance with Rule 45 in relation to Rule 56 and other pertinent provisions of the 1997 Rules of Civil Procedure, as amended, governing appeals by certiorari to the Supreme Court, only petitions which are accompanied by or which comply strictly with the requirements specified therein shall be entertained. On the basis thereof, the Court RESOLVES to DENY the petition for review on certiorari for failure to:
(a) give a written explanation why service of copy of the petition on respondent was not done personally, as a consequence of which the petition is deemed as not failed, in accordance with Section 11, Rule 13 in relation to Section 3, Rule 45 and Section 5(d), Rule 56; and
(b) submit a certification, duly executed by petitioner herself, that no other action or proceeding involving the same issues raised in this case has been filed or is pending before this Court, the Court of Appeals, or in the different divisions thereof, or any other tribunal or quasi-judicial agency, with the undertaking to inform the Court of any similar case filed or pending in any court or quasi-judicial agency that may thereafter come to her knowledge in accordance with Section 5, Rule 7, Section 4(e), Rule 45 in relation to Section 2, Rule 42, and Sections 4 and 5(d), Rule 56.
Very truly yours,
TOMASITA M. DRIS
Clerk of Court
HERE FOR THE LATEST SUPREME COURT JURISPRUDENCE
PHILIPPINE SUPREME COURT DECISIONS
QUICK SEARCH