ChanRobles Virtual law Library

[A.M. No. 99-10-05-0.February 26, 2002]

RE:PROCEDURE IN THE EXTRA-JUDICIAL FORECLOSURE OF MORTGAGES

EN BANC

Gentlemen:

Quoted hereunder, for your information, is a resolution of this Court dated FEB 26 2002.

A.M. No. 99-10-05-0(Re:Procedure in the Extra-Judicial Foreclosure of Mortgages.)

For consideration is the Memorandum, dated February 8, 2002, of Clerk of Court Luzviminda D. Puno transmitting the request of the Office of the Court Administrator (OCA) for the correction of Circular No. 7-2002 which the OCA had earlier submitted to provide guidelines for the enforcement of A.M. No. 99-10-05-0 and which was subsequently approved by this Court in its resolution of January 22, 2002.The corrections submitted for the Court's approval are as follows:

(1)������ [The] [l]etterhead should be that of the Office of the Court Administrator;

(2)������ [The] [t]itle of the circular should be deleted as the same is already stated in the subject matter;

(3)������ In relation to Sec. 4(b)(1), provision should be made as to personal notice to debtor-mortgagor, and instead of Circular No. 5-98, 12 January 1998, reference should be made to the new circular on publication, i.e., Guidelines in the Accreditation of Newspapers and Periodicals and Distribution of Legal Notices and Advertisements for Publication, Resolution promulgated on 16 October 2001 in A.M. No. 01-1-07-SC; and

(4)������ The word "Sheriff" in Sec. 6 should be changed to "Clerk of Court", thus:

"Sec. 6.After the sale, the Clerk of Court shall collect x x x."

After due consideration of the request of the Office of the Court Administrator and finding the same to be well taken, the Court RESOLVED:

(1) to GRANT the aforesaid request for the correction of Circular No. 7-2002, except No. 3 regarding the addition of a provision for personal notice of extrajudicial foreclosure of real estate mortgages to the debtor-mortgagor, which is hereby denied.Personal notice to the debtor-mortgagor in case of the extrajudicial foreclosure of real estate mortgage is not required by Act No. 3135 (Bonnevie v. Court of Appeals, 125 SCRA 122 (1983)), being merely the enforcement of the agreement of the parties to a contract (Community Savings and Loan Association, Inc. v. Court of Appeals, 153 SCRA 564 (1987)).The addition of such requirement can only make the procedure for extrajudicial foreclosure cumbersome; and

(2) to AMEND Sec. 4(b)(1) of its Circular No. 7-2002 so as to make it read as follows:

Sec. 4.The Sheriff to whom the application for extra-judicial foreclosure of mortgage was raffled shall do the following:

. . . .

b.(1) In case of foreclosure of real estate mortgage, cause the publication of the notice of sale by posting it for not less than twenty (20) days in at least three (3) public places in the municipality or city where the property is situated and if such property is worth more than four hundred (P400.00) pesos, by having such notice published once a week for at least three (3) consecutive weeks in a newspaper of general circulation in the municipality or city (Sec. 3, Act No. 3135, as amended).The executive Judge shall designate a regular working day and definite time each week during which said notice shall be distributed personally by him for publication to qualified newspapers or periodicals as defined in Sec. 1 of P.D. No. 1079, which distribution shall be effected by raffle (A.M. No. 01-1-07-SC, Oct. 16, 2001).UNLESS OTHERWISE STIPULATED BY THE PARTIES TO THE MORTGAGE CONTRACT, THE DEBTOR-MORTGAGOR NEED NOT BE PERSONALLY SERVED A COPY OF THE NOTICE OF THE EXTRAJUDICIAL FORECLOSURE.

The Clerk of Court is directed to furnish the OCA a magnetic (diskette) copy of Circular No. 7-2002 so that the pertinent changes can be made pursuant to this resolution.The OCA is directed to submit to the Court Circular No. 7-2002, as thus corrected, for final approval and for determination of the date of its effectivity.

Very truly yours,

LUZVIMINDA D. PUNO
Clerk of Court

(Sgd.) MA. LUISA D. VILLARAMA

Asst. Clerk of Court

Back to Home | Back to Main

CLICK HERE FOR THE LATEST SUPREME COURT JURISPRUDENCE