ChanRobles Virtual law Library

[G.R. No. 159085. August 5, 2003]

SANLAKAS vs. REYES

Gentlemen:

Quoted hereunder, for your information, is a resolution of this Court dated AUG 5 2003.

G.R. No.159085 (SANLAKAS, represented by Rep. J.V. Bautista and Partido ng Manggagawa, represented by Rep. Renato Magtubo vs. Executive Secretary, Secretary Angelo Reyes, Gen. Narciso Abaya, Dir.-Gen. Hermogenes Ebdane, Jr.)

In accordance with Rule 65 and other related provisions of the 1997 Rules of Civil Procedure, as amended, governing petitions for certiorari, prohibition and mandamus filed with the Supreme Court, only petitions which are accompanied by or which comply strictly with the requirements specified therein shall be entertained.On the basis thereof, the Court Resolved to DISMISS the instant petition for certiorari and prohibition for non-compliance therewith, particularly for failure to accompany petition with certified true copy of the Proclamation in violation of Rule 65, Section 1 and Rule 46, Section 3 in relation to Rule 56, Section 2 and to give an explanation why service was not done personally as required by Rule 13, Section 11 in relation to Rule 56, Section 2 (c).

Very truly yours,

(Sgd.)LUZVIMINDA D. PUNO
Clerk of Court

Back to Home | Back to Main

CLICK HERE FOR THE LATEST SUPREME COURT JURISPRUDENCE