ChanRobles Virtual law Library

chanrobles.com - PHILIPPINE SUPREME COURT RESOLUTIONS - ON-LINE

cralaw_scresolutions_separator.NHAD

[G.R. No. 143649. May 17, 2004]

AMA vs. CA

FIRST DIVISION

Gentlemen:

Quoted hereunder, for your information, is a resolution of this Court dated MAY 17 2004.

G.R. No. 143649 (AMA Computer College, Inc. vs. Court of Appeals and Philippine Basketball League.)

The present petition seeks to set aside the Decision dated 29 October 1999 and the Resolution dated 6 June 2000 of the Court of Appeals in CA-G.R. SP No. 46937. The subject of the petition before the Court of Appeals is the interlocutory Order of 19 November 1997 of the Regional Trial Court of Quezon City, Branch 223 ("RTC-Branch 223") which granted the application of petitioner AMA Computer College, Inc. ("AMA") for a writ of preliminary mandatory injunction in Civil Case No. Q-97-31294, as well as the Order of 24 December 1997 denying the motion for reconsideration of respondent Philippine Basketball League ("PBL").

The main case before the RTC-Branch 223 is a petition for mandamus with prayer for preliminary injunction and damages which sought to restore the franchise of AMA in the PBL and to be allowed to participate in the league's subsequent conferences. The assailed Order of 19 November 1997 of RTC-Branch 223 directed PBL to reinstate AMA's franchise and restore AMA's participation in the PBL Second Conference and in subsequent conferences. On petition for certiorari, the Court of Appeals, in its Decision dated 29 October 1999 in CA-G.R. SP No. 46937, nullified and set aside the orders of RTC-Branch 223. The case was elevated to this Court on petition for review. While the case was pending before this Court, RTC-Branch 223, on 30 September 2002, rendered a decision on the main case in favor of PBL ordering AMA to pay PBL P1,199,443.55 representing the second payment for television coverage and the cost of streamers and additional tickets. The RTC-decision of 30 September 2002 has rendered the present petition moot and academic. Moreover, the RTC-decision is pending appeal before the Court of Appeals.

WHEREFORE, in view of the foregoing, the Court RESOLVES to consider the present petition MOOT and ACADEMIC, and the same is closed and terminated.

Very truly yours,

(Sgd.) ENRIQUETA ESGUERRA-VIDAL
Clerk of Court


Back to Home | Back to Main

 

CLICK HERE FOR THE LATEST SUPREME COURT JURISPRUDENCE

PHILIPPINE SUPREME COURT DECISIONS

QUICK SEARCH

cralaw

 







chanrobles.com





ChanRobles Legal Resources:

ChanRobles On-Line Bar Review

ChanRobles Internet Bar Review : www.chanroblesbar.com

ChanRobles MCLE On-line

ChanRobles Lawnet Inc. - ChanRobles MCLE On-line : www.chanroblesmcleonline.com