ChanRobles Virtual law Library
[G.R. No. 144413.
REPUBLIC GLASS vs. QUA
FIRST DIVISION
Gentlemen:
Quoted hereunder, for your information, is a resolution of this
Court dated
G.R. No. 144413 (REPUBLIC GLASS CORPORATION and GERVEL, INC. vs. em>LAWRENCE C. QUA.)
This refers to the Motion for Clarification and/or
Reconsideration dated
Respondent's argument is untenable.
On
WHEREFORE, premises considered, this Court hereby renders judgment
ordering defendants jointly and severally liable to return to plaintiff the
1,892,360 shares of common stock of General Milling Corporation which they
foreclosed on December 9, 1988,
or
should the return of these shares he no longer possible then to pay to
plaintiff the amount of P3,860,646.00 with
interest at 6% per annum from December 9, 1988 until fully paid
and to pay plaintiff P100,000.00
as and for attorney's fees. The costs will be for defendants' account.
SO ORDERED. [1] cralaw (Emphasis supplied)
In our Decision, we declared void the foreclosure of respondent's
GMC shares. Consequently, petitioners should return the illegally foreclosed
shares, together with the cash, stock and other dividends on these shares, to
respondent. In case the return of the shares is no longer possible, petitioners
should pay respondent P3,860,646.00 only, with
interest at 6% per annum until fully paid, because this is the amount for which
the shares were sold during the foreclosure.
[2]
cralaw
Respondent did not introduce any evidence showing that this is not the value of
the shares at the time of the questioned foreclosure.
The Court can no longer consider respondent's prayer that petitioners reimburse respondent the present value of the shares if petitioners cannot return the shares. Respondent is raising this issue for the first time only in this motion. Issues, arguments, theories and causes of action not raised below may no longer be posed on appeal, [3] cralaw more so, on motion for reconsideration.
WHEREFORE, we DENY the instant Motion for Clarification and/or Reconsideration.
Ynares-Santiago, J., no part.
Azcuna, J., on leave.
Very truly yours,
(Sgd.) ENRIQUETA
ESGUERRA-VIDAL
Clerk of Court
Endnotes:
[1] cralaw RTC Decision, rollo, p. 69.
[2] cralaw Ibid.
[3] cralaw Agra v. Philippine National Bank, 368 Phil. 833 (1999).
HERE FOR THE LATEST SUPREME COURT JURISPRUDENCE
PHILIPPINE SUPREME COURT DECISIONS
QUICK SEARCH