ChanRobles Virtual law Library

[G.R. No. 155307.� September 14, 2005]

CALIMLIM vs. CAMMAYO

Sirs/Mesdames:

Quoted hereunder, for your information, is a resolution of this Court dated SEP 14 2005.

G.R. No. 155307 (M.A. Jimenez Enterprises, Inc., represented by Cesar Calimlim vs. The Honorable Ombudsman, Jesus P. Cammayo, Arturo Santos, Manuel Factora, Teodoro Barrozo, Manuel Roy, Ronald Manalili and John Ulassus.)

R E S O L U T I O N

Acting on the Motion for Reconsideration of the petitioner of the Resolution dated November 27, 2002 dismissing the instant Petition for Certiorari for lack of sufficient showing that the questioned judgment is tainted with grave abuse of discretion, together with the Comment of respondent Jesus Cammayo dated May 16, 2003, the Comment of respondent Engr. Teodoro Barrozo dated May 9, 2003, the Comment of the Office of the Solicitor General for respondents Jesus Cammayo, Arturo Santos and Manuel Factora dated October 16, 2003, the Comment of respondent Manuel Roy dated September 4, 2004 and the separate Replies of petitioners thereto dated June 10, 2003, May 11, 2005, January 27, 2004 and April 11, 2005, respectively, and finding said motion to be well-taken, the same is GRANTED. Accordingly, the petition for certiorari is REINSTATED and the respondents, including respondents John Ulassus and Ronald Manalili whose comments on the Motion for Reconsideration were dispensed with in the Resolution of August 10, 2005, are REQUIRED to file Comment on the Petition for Certiorari, within ten (10) days from notice hereof.

Very truly yours,

(Sgd.) LUDICHI YASAY-NUNAG
Clerk of Court

Back to Home | Back to Main

CLICK HERE FOR THE LATEST SUPREME COURT JURISPRUDENCE