ChanRobles Virtual law Library

EN BANC

Sirs/Mesdames:

Quoted hereunder, for your information, is a resolution of this Court dated SEP 27 2005.

G.R. No. 169475 ( Humberto Ermac vs. Benjamin Abalos, Rufino Javier, Mehol Sadain, Resurreccion Z. Borra, Florentine A. Tuason, Jr., as public respondents, and Camila Sweet as the private respondent .)

In accordance with Rule 64 and other related provisions of the 1997 Rules of Civil Procedure, as amended, governing review of judgments and final orders or resolutions of the Commission on Elections, only petitions which are accompanied by or which comply strictly with the requirements specified therein shall be entertained. On the basis thereof, the Court Resolved to DISMISS the instant petition for certiorari for non-compliance therewith, particularly for insufficiency of the petition in form as the verification is defective under Rule 64, Section 5.

In any event, the petition would still be dismissed for failure of the petition to sufficiently show that any grave abuse of discretion was committed by the Commission on Elections in rendering the challenged resolutions which, on the contrary, appear to be in accord with the facts and applicable law and jurisprudence.

Very truly yours,

(Sgd.) MA. LUISA D. VILLARAMA

Clerk of Court

Back to Home | Back to Main

CLICK HERE FOR THE LATEST SUPREME COURT JURISPRUDENCE