UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT DECISIONS ON-LINE

UNITED STATES v. HALEY, 358 U.S. 644 (1959)

Subscribe to Cases that cite 358 U.S. 644 RSS feed for this section

U.S. Supreme Court

UNITED STATES v. HALEY, 358 U.S. 644 (1959)

358 U.S. 644

UNITED STATES v. HALEY.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT
OF TEXAS. No. 587.
Decided February 24, 1959.

166 F. Supp. 336, reversed.

Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Hansen, Charles H. Weston, R. L. Farrington, Neil Brooks and Donald A. Campbell for the United States.

William F. Billings, James P. Donovan and Daniel L. O'Connor for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is reversed. Wickard v. Filburn, 317 U.S. 111.


LANDMAN v. MIEDZINSKI, <a href="http://www.chanrobles.com/usa/us_supremecourt/358/644/case.php">358 U.S. 644</A> (1959) 358 U.S. 644 (1959) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

LANDMAN v. MIEDZINSKI, 358 U.S. 644 (1959)

358 U.S. 644

LANDMAN ET AL. v. MIEDZINSKI, SHERIFF, ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF MARYLAND.
No. 589.
Decided February 24, 1959.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 218 Md. 3, 145 A. 2d 220.

F. Joseph Donohue and Harold C. Faulkner for appellants.

C. Ferdinand Sybert, Attorney General of Maryland, Stedman Prescott, Jr., Deputy Attorney General, and James H. Norris, Jr. for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Page 358 U.S. 644, 645


chanrobles.com



ChanRobles Professional Review, Inc.

ChanRobles Professional Review, Inc. : www.chanroblesprofessionalreview.com
ChanRobles On-Line Bar Review

ChanRobles Internet Bar Review : www.chanroblesbar.com
ChanRobles CPA Review Online

ChanRobles CPALE Review Online : www.chanroblescpareviewonline.com
ChanRobles Special Lecture Series

ChanRobles Special Lecture Series - Memory Man : www.chanroblesbar.com/memoryman