UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT DECISIONS ON-LINE

RANDOLPH v. VIRGINIA, 374 U.S. 97 (1963)

Subscribe to Cases that cite 374 U.S. 97 RSS feed for this section

U.S. Supreme Court

RANDOLPH v. VIRGINIA, 374 U.S. 97 (1963)

374 U.S. 97

RANDOLPH ET AL. v. VIRGINIA.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS OF
VIRGINIA. No. 20.
Decided June 10, 1963.

Certiorari granted; judgments vacated; and case remanded.

Reported below: 202 Va. 661, 119 S. E. 2d 817.

Martin A. Martin, Clarence W. Newsome, Jack Greenberg, James M. Nabrit III, and Charles L. Black, Jr. for petitioners.

Robert Y. Button, Attorney General of Virginia, and R. D. McIlwaine III, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari is granted, the judgments are vacated and the case is remanded to the Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia for reconsideration in light of Peterson v. City of Greenville, 373 U.S. 244.

MR. JUSTICE HARLAN concurs in the result on the premises stated in his separate opinion in Peterson v. City of Greenville and Avent v. North Carolina, 373 U.S., at 248.

Page 374 U.S. 97, 98


chanrobles.com



ChanRobles Professional Review, Inc.

ChanRobles Professional Review, Inc. : www.chanroblesprofessionalreview.com
ChanRobles On-Line Bar Review

ChanRobles Internet Bar Review : www.chanroblesbar.com
ChanRobles CPA Review Online

ChanRobles CPALE Review Online : www.chanroblescpareviewonline.com
ChanRobles Special Lecture Series

ChanRobles Special Lecture Series - Memory Man : www.chanroblesbar.com/memoryman