US SUPREME COURT DECISIONS
REED v. ILLINOIS, 385 U.S. 10 (1966)
Subscribe to Cases that cite 385 U.S. 10U.S. Supreme Court
REED v. ILLINOIS, 385 U.S. 10 (1966)
385 U.S. 10 REED v. ILLINOIS.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF ILLINOIS.
No. 282.
Decided October 10, 1966.
33 Ill. 2d 535, 213 N. E. 2d 278, appeal dismissed.
Mort A. Segall for appellant.
William G. Clark, Attorney General of Illinois, and Richard A. Michael and Philip J. Rock, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
U.S. Supreme Court
TREFFRY v. TAYLOR, 385 U.S. 10 (1966)
385 U.S. 10 TREFFRY ET AL. v. TAYLOR, DIRECTOR OF LICENSES FOR THE STATE OF
WASHINGTON, ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF WASHINGTON. No. 291.
Decided October 10, 1966.
67 Wash. 2d 487, 408 P.2d 269, appeal dismissed.
Francis J. Conklin for appellants.
PER CURIAM.
The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
