US SUPREME COURT DECISIONS
RANDOLPH v. UNITED STATES, 389 U.S. 570 (1968)
Subscribe to Cases that cite 389 U.S. 570U.S. Supreme Court
RANDOLPH v. UNITED STATES, 389 U.S. 570 (1968)
389 U.S. 570 RANDOLPH v. UNITED STATES.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT
OF NORTH CAROLINA. No. 879.
Decided January 15, 1968.
274 F. Supp. 200, affirmed.
Clyde C. Randolph, Jr., pro se, and Jerry Dee Moize for appellant.
Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Weisl, Morton Hollander and Jack H. Weiner for the United States.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.
U.S. Supreme Court
DINIS v. VOLPE, 389 U.S. 570 (1968)
389 U.S. 570 DINIS ET AL. v. VOLPE, GOVERNOR OF MASSACHUSETTS, ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF
MASSACHUSETTS. No. 882.
Decided January 15, 1968.
264 F. Supp. 425, affirmed.
Edmund Dinis, pro se, for other appellants.
Elliot L. Richardson, Attorney General of Massachusetts, Howard M. Miller, Assistant Attorney General, and Mark L. Cohen, Deputy Assistant Attorney General, for appellees.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.
