US SUPREME COURT DECISIONS

Swarthout v. Cooke - 10-333 (2011)



562 U. S. ____ (2011)
SWARTHOUT V. COOKE
562 U. S. ____ (2011)

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

GARY SWARTHOUT, WARDEN v. DAMON COOKE

MATTHEW CATE, SECRETARY, CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION v. ELIJAH CLAY

On petition for writ of certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the ninth circuit

No. 10–333. Decided January 24, 2011

Justice Ginsburg, concurring:chanrobles.com-red

In Superintendent, Mass. Correctional Institution at Walpole v. Hill, 472 U. S. 445, 455 (1985), this Court held that, to comply with due process, revocation of a prisoner’s good time credits must be supported by “some evidence.” If California law entitled prisoners to parole upon satisfaction of specified criteria, then Hill would be closely in point. See In re Rosenkrantz, 29 Cal. 4th 616, 657–658, 59 P. 3d 174, 205 (2002). The Ninth Circuit, however, has determined that for California’s parole system, as for Nebraska’s, Greenholtz v. Inmates of Neb. Penal and Correctional Complex, 442 U. S. 1 (1979), is the controlling precedent. Hayward v. Marshall, 603 F. 3d 546, 559–561 (2010) (en banc)). Given that determination, I agree that today’s summary disposition is in order.




























chanrobles.com



ChanRobles Legal Resources:

ChanRobles On-Line Bar Review

ChanRobles Internet Bar Review : www.chanroblesbar.com

ChanRobles MCLE On-line

ChanRobles Lawnet Inc. - ChanRobles MCLE On-line : www.chanroblesmcleonline.com