US LAWS, STATUTES & CODES ON-LINE

US Supreme Court Decisions On-Line | US Laws



§ 315. —  Appeal.



[Laws in effect as of January 24, 2002]
[Document not affected by Public Laws enacted between
  January 24, 2002 and December 19, 2002]
[CITE: 35USC315]

 
                            TITLE 35--PATENTS
 
            PART III--PATENTS AND PROTECTION OF PATENT RIGHTS
 
       CHAPTER 31--OPTIONAL INTER PARTES REEXAMINATION PROCEDURES
 
Sec. 315. Appeal

    (a) Patent Owner.--The patent owner involved in an inter partes 
reexamination proceeding under this chapter--
        (1) may appeal under the provisions of section 134 and may 
    appeal under the provisions of sections 141 through 144, with 
    respect to any decision adverse to the patentability of any original 
    or proposed amended or new claim of the patent; and
        (2) may be a party to any appeal taken by a third-party 
    requester under subsection (b).

    (b) Third-Party Requester.--A third-party requester--
        (1) may appeal under the provisions of section 134, and may 
    appeal under the provisions of sections 141 through 144, with 
    respect to any final decision favorable to the patentability of any 
    original or proposed amended or new claim of the patent; and
        (2) may, subject to subsection (c), be a party to any appeal 
    taken by the patent owner under the provisions of section 134 or 
    sections 141 through 144.

    (c) Civil Action.--A third-party requester whose request for an 
inter partes reexamination results in an order under section 313 is 
estopped from asserting at a later time, in any civil action arising in 
whole or in part under section 1338 of title 28, the invalidity of any 
claim finally determined to be valid and patentable on any ground which 
the third-party requester raised or could have raised during the inter 
partes reexamination proceedings. This subsection does not prevent the 
assertion of invalidity based on newly discovered prior art unavailable 
to the third-party requester and the Patent and Trademark Office at the 
time of the inter partes reexamination proceedings.

(Added Pub. L. 106-113, div. B, Sec. 1000(a)(9) [title IV, 
Sec. 4604(a)], Nov. 29, 1999, 113 Stat. 1536, 1501A-569; amended Pub. L. 
107-273, div. C, title III, Secs. 13106(a), 13202(a)(4), (c)(1), Nov. 2, 
2002, 116 Stat. 1900-1902.)


                               Amendments

    2002--Pub. L. 107-273, Sec. 13202(c)(1), made technical correction 
to directory language of Pub. L. 106-113, which enacted this section.
    Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 107-273, Sec. 13106(a), reenacted heading 
without change and amended text generally. Prior to amendment, text read 
as follows: ``A third-party requester may--
        ``(1) appeal under the provisions of section 134 with respect to 
    any final decision favorable to the patentability of any original or 
    proposed amended or new claim of the patent; or
        ``(2) be a party to any appeal taken by the patent owner under 
    the provisions of section 134, subject to subsection (c).''
    Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 107-273, Sec. 13202(a)(4), struck out ``United 
States Code,'' after ``title 28,''.


                    Effective Date of 2002 Amendment

    Amendment by section 13106(a) of Pub. L. 107-273 applicable with 
respect to any reexamination proceeding commenced on or after Nov. 2, 
2002, see section 13106(d) of Pub. L. 107-273, set out as a note under 
section 134 of this title.


                    Estoppel Effect of Reexamination

    Pub. L. 106-113, div. B, Sec. 1000(a)(9) [title IV, subtitle F, 
Sec. 4607], Nov. 29, 1999, 113 Stat. 1536, 1501A-571, provided that: 
``Any party who requests an inter partes reexamination under section 311 
of title 35, United States Code, is estopped from challenging at a later 
time, in any civil action, any fact determined during the process of 
such reexamination, except with respect to a fact determination later 
proved to be erroneous based on information unavailable at the time of 
the inter partes reexamination decision. If this section is held to be 
unenforceable, the enforceability of the remainder of this subtitle [see 
Short Title of 1999 Amendment note set out under section 1 of this 
title] or of this title [see Tables for classification] shall not be 
denied as a result.''



chanrobles.com.Com


ChanRobles Legal Resources:

ChanRobles On-Line Bar Review

ChanRobles Internet Bar Review : www.chanroblesbar.com

ChanRobles MCLE On-line

ChanRobles Lawnet Inc. - ChanRobles MCLE On-line : www.chanroblesmcleonline.com