US LAWS, STATUTES & CODES ON-LINE

US Supreme Court Decisions On-Line | US Laws



§ 605. —  Decision by contracting officer.



[Laws in effect as of January 24, 2002]
[Document not affected by Public Laws enacted between
  January 24, 2002 and December 19, 2002]
[CITE: 41USC605]

 
                       TITLE 41--PUBLIC CONTRACTS
 
                      CHAPTER 9--CONTRACT DISPUTES
 
Sec. 605. Decision by contracting officer


(a) Contractor claims

    All claims by a contractor against the government relating to a 
contract shall be in writing and shall be submitted to the contracting 
officer for a decision. All claims by the government against a 
contractor relating to a contract shall be the subject of a decision by 
the contracting officer. Each claim by a contractor against the 
government relating to a contract and each claim by the government 
against a contractor relating to a contract shall be submitted within 6 
years after the accrual of the claim. The preceding sentence does not 
apply to a claim by the government against a contractor that is based on 
a claim by the contractor involving fraud. The contracting officer shall 
issue his decisions in writing, and shall mail or otherwise furnish a 
copy of the decision to the contractor. The decision shall state the 
reasons for the decision reached, and shall inform the contractor of his 
rights as provided in this chapter. Specific findings of fact are not 
required, but, if made, shall not be binding in any subsequent 
proceeding. The authority of this subsection shall not extend to a claim 
or dispute for penalties or forfeitures prescribed by statute or 
regulation which another Federal agency is specifically authorized to 
administer, settle, or determine. This section shall not authorize any 
agency head to settle, compromise, pay, or otherwise adjust any claim 
involving fraud.

(b) Review; performance of contract pending appeal

    The contracting officer's decision on the claim shall be final and 
conclusive and not subject to review by any forum, tribunal, or 
Government agency, unless an appeal or suit is timely commenced as 
authorized by this chapter. Nothing in this chapter shall prohibit 
executive agencies from including a clause in government contracts 
requiring that pending final decision of an appeal, action, or final 
settlement, a contractor shall proceed diligently with performance of 
the contract in accordance with the contracting officer's decision.

(c) Amount of claim; certification; notification; time of issuance; 
        presumption

    (1) A contracting officer shall issue a decision on any submitted 
claim of $100,000 or less within sixty days from his receipt of a 
written request from the contractor that a decision be rendered within 
that period. For claims of more than $100,000, the contractor shall 
certify that the claim is made in good faith, that the supporting data 
are accurate and complete to the best of his knowledge and belief, that 
the amount requested accurately reflects the contract adjustment for 
which the contractor believes the government is liable, and that the 
certifier is duly authorized to certify the claim on behalf of the 
contractor.
    (2) A contracting officer shall, within sixty days of receipt of a 
submitted certified claim over $100,000--
        (A) issue a decision; or
        (B) notify the contractor of the time within which a decision 
    will be issued.

    (3) The decision of a contracting officer on submitted claims shall 
be issued within a reasonable time, in accordance with regulations 
promulgated by the agency, taking into account such factors as the size 
and complexity of the claim and the adequacy of the information in 
support of the claim provided by the contractor.
    (4) A contractor may request the tribunal concerned to direct a 
contracting officer to issue a decision in a specified period of time, 
as determined by the tribunal concerned, in the event of undue delay on 
the part of the contracting officer.
    (5) Any failure by the contracting officer to issue a decision on a 
contract claim within the period required will be deemed to be a 
decision by the contracting officer denying the claim and will authorize 
the commencement of the appeal or suit on the claim as otherwise 
provided in this chapter. However, in the event an appeal or suit is so 
commenced in the absence of a prior decision by the contracting officer, 
the tribunal concerned may, at its option, stay the proceedings to 
obtain a decision on the claim by the contracting officer.
    (6) The contracting officer shall have no obligation to render a 
final decision on any claim of more than $100,000 that is not certified 
in accordance with paragraph (1) if, within 60 days after receipt of the 
claim, the contracting officer notifies the contractor in writing of the 
reasons why any attempted certification was found to be defective. A 
defect in the certification of a claim shall not deprive a court or an 
agency board of contract appeals of jurisdiction over that claim. Prior 
to the entry of a final judgment by a court or a decision by an agency 
board of contract appeals, the court or agency board shall require a 
defective certification to be corrected.
    (7) The certification required by paragraph (1) may be executed by 
any person duly authorized to bind the contractor with respect to the 
claim.

(d) Alternative means of dispute resolution

    Notwithstanding any other provision of this chapter, a contractor 
and a contracting officer may use any alternative means of dispute 
resolution under subchapter IV of chapter 5 of title 5, or other 
mutually agreeable procedures, for resolving claims. The contractor 
shall certify the claim when required to do so as provided under 
subsection (c)(1) of this section or as otherwise required by law. All 
provisions of subchapter IV of chapter 5 of title 5 shall apply to such 
alternative means of dispute resolution.

(e) Termination of authority to engage in alternative means of dispute 
        resolution; savings provision

    In any case in which the contracting officer rejects a contractor's 
request for alternative dispute resolution proceedings, the contracting 
officer shall provide the contractor with a written explanation, citing 
one or more of the conditions in section 572(b) of title 5 or such other 
specific reasons that alternative dispute resolution procedures are 
inappropriate for the resolution of the dispute. In any case in which a 
contractor rejects a request of an agency for alternative dispute 
resolution proceedings, the contractor shall inform the agency in 
writing of the contractor's specific reasons for rejecting the request.

(Pub. L. 95-563, Sec. 6, Nov. 1, 1978, 92 Stat. 2384; Pub. L. 101-552, 
Sec. 6(a), Nov. 15, 1990, 104 Stat. 2745; Pub. L. 102-572, title IX, 
Sec. 907(a)(1), Oct. 29, 1992, 106 Stat. 4518; Pub. L. 103-355, title 
II, Secs. 2351(a)[(1)], (b), (e), 2352, Oct. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 3322; 
Pub. L. 104-106, div. D, title XLIII, Secs. 4321(a)(6), (7), 4322(b)(6), 
Feb. 10, 1996, 110 Stat. 671, 677; Pub. L. 104-320, Sec. 6, Oct. 19, 
1996, 110 Stat. 3871; Pub. L. 105-85, div. A, title X, Sec. 1073(g)(3), 
Nov. 18, 1997, 111 Stat. 1906.)


                               Amendments

    1997--Subsecs. (d), (e). Pub. L. 105-85 struck out ``(as in effect 
on September 30, 1995)'' after ``title 5'' wherever appearing.
    1996--Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 104-106, Sec. 4321(a)(6), made technical 
correction to Pub. L. 103-355, Sec. 2351(a). See 1994 Amendment note 
below.
    Subsec. (d). Pub. L. 104-320, Sec. 6(1), substituted ``The 
contractor shall certify the claim when required to do so as provided 
under subsection (c)(1) of this section or as otherwise required by 
law.'' for ``In a case in which such alternative means of dispute 
resolution or other mutually agreeable procedures are used, the 
contractor shall certify that the claim is made in good faith, that the 
supporting data are accurate and complete to the best of his or her 
knowledge and belief, and that the amount requested accurately reflects 
the contract adjustment for which the contractor believes the Government 
is liable.''
    Pub. L. 104-106, Sec. 4322(b)(6), inserted ``(as in effect on 
September 30, 1995)'' after ``title 5'' in two places.
    Subsec. (e). Pub. L. 104-320, Sec. 6(2), struck out first sentence 
which read as follows: ``The authority of agencies to engage in 
alternative means of dispute resolution proceedings under subsection (d) 
of this section shall cease to be effective on October 1, 1999, except 
that such authority shall continue in effect with respect to then 
pending dispute resolution proceedings which, in the judgment of the 
agencies that are parties to such proceedings, require such 
continuation, until such proceedings terminate.''
    Pub. L. 104-106, Sec. 4322(b)(6), inserted ``(as in effect on 
September 30, 1995)'' after ``title 5''.
    Pub. L. 104-106, Sec. 4321(a)(7), made technical amendment to Pub. 
L. 103-355, Sec. 2352(b). See 1994 Amendment note below.
    1994--Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 103-355, Sec. 2351(a)(1), as amended by 
Pub. L. 104-106, Sec. 4321(a)(6), inserted after second sentence ``Each 
claim by a contractor against the government relating to a contract and 
each claim by the government against a contractor relating to a contract 
shall be submitted within 6 years after the accrual of the claim. The 
preceding sentence does not apply to a claim by the government against a 
contractor that is based on a claim by the contractor involving fraud.''
    Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 103-355, Sec. 2351(b), substituted ``$100,000'' 
for ``$50,000'' wherever appearing.
    Subsec. (c)(4). Pub. L. 103-355, Sec. 2351(e), substituted 
``tribunal concerned'' for ``agency board of contract appeals'' and 
``tribunal concerned,'' for ``board,''.
    Subsec. (e). Pub. L. 103-355, Sec. 2352(b), as amended by Pub. L. 
104-106, Sec. 4321(a)(7), inserted after first sentence ``In any case in 
which the contracting officer rejects a contractor's request for 
alternative dispute resolution proceedings, the contracting officer 
shall provide the contractor with a written explanation, citing one or 
more of the conditions in section 572(b) of title 5 or such other 
specific reasons that alternative dispute resolution procedures are 
inappropriate for the resolution of the dispute. In any case in which a 
contractor rejects a request of an agency for alternative dispute 
resolution proceedings, the contractor shall inform the agency in 
writing of the contractor's specific reasons for rejecting the 
request.''
    Pub. L. 103-355, Sec. 2352(a), substituted ``October 1, 1999'' for 
``October 1, 1995''.
    1992--Subsec. (c)(1). Pub. L. 102-572, Sec. 907(a)(1)(A), struck out 
``and'' after ``belief,'' and inserted before period at end ``, and that 
the certifier is duly authorized to certify the claim on behalf of the 
contractor''.
    Subsec. (c)(6), (7). Pub. L. 102-572, Sec. 907(a)(1)(B), added pars. 
(6) and (7).
    1990--Subsecs. (d), (e). Pub. L. 101-552 added subsecs. (d) and (e).


                    Effective Date of 1996 Amendment

    Section 4321(a) of Pub. L. 104-106 provided that the amendment made 
by that section is effective as of Oct. 13, 1994, and as if included in 
Pub. L. 103-355 as enacted.
    For effective date and applicability of amendment by section 
4322(b)(6) of Pub. L. 104-106, see section 4401 of Pub. L. 104-106, set 
out as a note under section 251 of this title.


                    Effective Date of 1994 Amendment

    For effective date and applicability of amendment by Pub. L. 103-
355, see section 10001 of Pub. L. 103-355, set out as a note under 
section 251 of this title.


                    Effective Date of 1992 Amendment

    Section 907(a)(2) of Pub. L. 102-572 provided that: ``The amendment 
made by paragraph (1)(B) [amending this section] shall be effective with 
respect to all claims filed before, on, or after the date of the 
enactment of this Act [Oct. 29, 1992], except for those claims which, 
before such date of enactment, have been the subject of an appeal to an 
agency board of contract appeals or a suit in the United States Claims 
Court.''
    Section 907(a)(4) of Pub. L. 102-572 provided that: ``The amendments 
made by paragraph (1)(A) [amending this section] shall be effective with 
respect to certifications executed more than 60 days after the effective 
date of amendments to the Federal Acquisition Regulation implementing 
the amendments made by paragraph (1)(A) with respect to the 
certification of claims.'' [For effective date of implementing 
regulations, see 59 F.R. 11368, Mar. 10, 1994.]


Effect of Contract Provisions Providing for Submission of Claims Earlier 
                      Than Six Years After Accrual

    Section 2351(a)(2) of Pub. L. 103-355 provided that: 
``Notwithstanding the third sentence of section 6(a) of the Contract 
Disputes Act of 1978 [41 U.S.C. 605(a)], as added by paragraph (1), if a 
contract in existence on the date of the enactment of this Act [Oct. 13, 
1994] requires that a claim referred to in that sentence be submitted 
earlier than 6 years after the accrual of the claim, then the claim 
shall be submitted within the period required by the contract. The 
preceding sentence does not apply to a claim by the Federal Government 
against a contractor that is based on a claim by the contractor 
involving fraud.''

                  Section Referred to in Other Sections

    This section is referred to in sections 256, 606, 609, 611 of this 
title; title 5 section 504; title 10 section 2324; title 28 section 
1491; title 31 section 3907.



chanrobles.com.Com


ChanRobles Legal Resources:

ChanRobles On-Line Bar Review

ChanRobles Internet Bar Review : www.chanroblesbar.com

ChanRobles MCLE On-line

ChanRobles Lawnet Inc. - ChanRobles MCLE On-line : www.chanroblesmcleonline.com