January 1906 - Philippine Supreme Court Decisions/Resolutions
Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence
Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence > Year 1906 > January 1906 Decisions >
G.R. No. 2597 January 24, 1906 - UNITED STATES v. JUAN GLEFONEA
005 Phil 570:
005 Phil 570:
EN BANC
[G.R. No. 2597. January 24, 1906. ]
THE UNITED STATES, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. JUAN GLEFONEA, Defendant-Appellant.
Thomas D. Aitken, for Appellant.
Solicitor-General Araneta, for Appellee.
SYLLABUS
1. CRIMINAL LAW; SLEEPING ON DUTY BY SENTINEL; SUBSIDIARY IMPRISONMENT. — The provision of the Spanish Penal Code, imposing subsidiary imprisonment do not apply to crimes defined and punished by the acts of the Philippine Commission. Subsidiary imprisonment can not be imposed for the crimes created by the Philippine Commission, unless such acts contain express provisions therefor.
D E C I S I O N
JOHNSON, J. :
This defendant was a member of the Philippines Constabulary and was charged with the crime of sleeping on duty. The court below, after an examination of the evidence adduced during the trial, found the defendant guilty of said offense and sentenced him to be imprisoned for a period of one year and to pay a fine of 300 pesos and to suffer, in case of insolvency, subsidiary imprisonment at the rate of one day for each 12 1/2 pesetas, and to pay the costs. From this decision the defendant appealed to this court.
An examination of the evidence adduced during the trial of the cause in the court below is sufficient to justify the finding of facts that the defendant did sleep while on duty on the night of the 8th of March, 1905. However, taking into consideration all of the facts contained in the record submitted to this court, we are of the opinion that imprisonment for a period of three months and a fine of 50 pesos is sufficient penalty for the offense of which the defendant is guilty. The defendant was tried and convicted under the provisions of section 8 of Act No. 619 of the Philippine Commission. Said section provides:jgc:chanrobles.com.ph
"Any member of the Constabulary who, while on duty as a sentinel, is found sleeping upon his post, or who leaves it before he is regularly relieved, shall be fined not exceeding five hundreds dollars or imprisonment not exceeding one year, or both."cralaw virtua1aw library
The inferior court imposed subsidiary imprisonment upon the defendant in case of insolvency. There is no provision for subsidiary imprisonment in the act creating the crime with which the defendant was charged. The provisions of the Spanish Penal Code, still in force in these Islands with reference to subsidiary imprisonment, have no application to crimes created by acts of the Commission. That part of the sentence of the inferior court which imposes subsidiary imprisonment is therefore hereby reversed.
It is the judgment of this court that the sentence of the inferior court be modified and that the defendant be sentenced to be imprisoned for a period of three months and to pay a fine of 50 pesos and the costs.
After the expiration of ten days let this cause be remanded to the inferior court for the execution of the foregoing decision. So ordered.
Arellano, C.J., Torres, Mapa, Carson and Willard, JJ., concur.
An examination of the evidence adduced during the trial of the cause in the court below is sufficient to justify the finding of facts that the defendant did sleep while on duty on the night of the 8th of March, 1905. However, taking into consideration all of the facts contained in the record submitted to this court, we are of the opinion that imprisonment for a period of three months and a fine of 50 pesos is sufficient penalty for the offense of which the defendant is guilty. The defendant was tried and convicted under the provisions of section 8 of Act No. 619 of the Philippine Commission. Said section provides:jgc:chanrobles.com.ph
"Any member of the Constabulary who, while on duty as a sentinel, is found sleeping upon his post, or who leaves it before he is regularly relieved, shall be fined not exceeding five hundreds dollars or imprisonment not exceeding one year, or both."cralaw virtua1aw library
The inferior court imposed subsidiary imprisonment upon the defendant in case of insolvency. There is no provision for subsidiary imprisonment in the act creating the crime with which the defendant was charged. The provisions of the Spanish Penal Code, still in force in these Islands with reference to subsidiary imprisonment, have no application to crimes created by acts of the Commission. That part of the sentence of the inferior court which imposes subsidiary imprisonment is therefore hereby reversed.
It is the judgment of this court that the sentence of the inferior court be modified and that the defendant be sentenced to be imprisoned for a period of three months and to pay a fine of 50 pesos and the costs.
After the expiration of ten days let this cause be remanded to the inferior court for the execution of the foregoing decision. So ordered.
Arellano, C.J., Torres, Mapa, Carson and Willard, JJ., concur.
