Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence


Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence > Year 1909 > September 1909 Decisions > G.R. No. 4973 September 18, 1909 - UNITED STATES v. BERNABE CATIPON, ET AL.

014 Phil 188:




PHILIPPINE SUPREME COURT DECISIONS

FIRST DIVISION

[G.R. No. 4973. September 18, 1909. ]

THE UNITED STATES, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. BERNABE CATIPON, ET AL., Defendants. — RUFINO DAVALOS, Appellant.

Pablo Borbon for Appellant.

Solicitor-General Harvey for Appellee.

SYLLABUS


1. ROBBERY "EN CUADRILLA;" PENALTY. — The penalties prescribed in article 504 of the Penal Code for the various crimes of robbery defined in subsection 3, 4 and 5 of article 503, when such robberies have been committed en cuadrilla (in an armed band), are the maximum degree of the penalties prescribed for such robberies as set out in those subsections; and these penalties are themselves divided into three separate degree, and should be imposed in their medium, maximum degree as may be required by the presence or absence of other aggravating or extenuating circumstances.


D E C I S I O N


CARSON, J. :


The evidence of record sustains beyond a reasonable doubt the findings of the trial judge as to the guilt of the appellant of the complex crime of robo con lesiones graves (robbery with grave physical injuries), committed by an armed band, the physical injuries inflicted upon the offended party being such as to render his left leg useless for life, and the commission of the offense being marked by the aggravating circumstances of nocturnity and of its commission in the house of the offended party. The crime thus committed is defined and penalized in subsection 3 of article 503, read together with article 504 of the Penal Code, and the penalty prescribed therefor is the maximum degree of cadena temporal, that is to say, from seventeen years and four months to twenty years of cadena temporal. The crime thus defined and penalized having been marked by two aggravating circumstances, to wit, nocturnity and the commission of the crime in the house of the offended party, and no extenuating circumstances, this penalty should be imposed in its maximum degree. The maximum degree of the maximum degree of cadena temporal is from nineteen years, one month, and eleven days to twenty years’ cadena temporal.

The trial court imposed the penalty of seventeen years, four months, and one day of cadena temporal, evidently treating the fact that the crime was committed by an armed band as merely one of several aggravating circumstances necessitating the imposition of the penalty prescribed for the crime defined and penalized in subsection 3 of article 503 in its maximum degree, and neglecting the provisions of article 504, which penalize the robberies referred to in subsection 3, 4 and 5 of article 503, when committed by an armed band, with the maximum degree of the penalties prescribed in those subsections, so that in determining the penalty to be imposed when there are other aggravating or extenuating circumstances, the maximum degree of the penalties prescribed in those subsections is itself to be divided into three separate degrees and the penalties imposed accordingly.

The judgment of the trial court should be modified by imposing the penalty of nineteen years, one month, and eleven days of cadena temporal, this penalty being the maximum of the maximum degree of the penalty prescribed in subsection 3 of article 503, instead of the penalty of seventeen years four months and one day of cadena temporal therein imposed, and thus modified the judgment and sentence of the trial court should be and are hereby affirmed, with the costs of this instance against the Appellant.

Arellano, C.J., Torres, Johnson and Moreland, JJ., concur.




Back to Home | Back to Main


chanrobles.com



ChanRobles On-Line Bar Review

ChanRobles Internet Bar Review : www.chanroblesbar.com





September-1909 Jurisprudence                 

  • G.R. No. 5153 September 1, 1909 - UNITED STATES v. BARTOLOME MIJARES

    014 Phil 83

  • G.R. No. 5171 September 1, 1909 - UNITED STATES v. LAO LOCK HING

    014 Phil 86

  • G.R. No. 5126 September 2, 1909 - UNITED STATES v. CATALINO APOSTOL

    014 Phil 92

  • G.R. No. 3862 September 6, 1909 - JUAN G. BOSQUE v. YU CHIPCO

    014 Phil 95

  • G.R. No. 4437 September 9, 1909 - TOMAS OSMEÑA v. CENONA RAMA

    014 Phil 99

  • G.R. No. 4471 September 9, 1909 - DAMASA SEGUI v. CANDIDO SEGUI

    014 Phil 102

  • G.R. No. 5273 September 9, 1909 - FRANCISCA JOSE v. WENCESLAUA DAMIAN

    014 Phil 104

  • G.R. No. 5067 September 11, 1909 - UNITED STATES v. CORNELIO MANALO

    016 Phil 654

  • G.R. No. 5618 September 14, 1909 - IN RE: H. G. SMITH

    014 Phil 112

  • G.R. No. 4177 September 15, 1909 - AGATON ARANETA v. BRAULIO MONTELIBANO

    014 Phil 117

  • G.R. No. 4235 September 15, 1909 - SANTIAGO TIN FIAN v. PABLO TAN

    014 Phil 126

  • G.R. No. 4963 September 15, 1909 - UNITED STATES v. GO CHICO

    014 Phil 128

  • G.R. No. 5156 September 15, 1909 - UNITED STATES v. SEBASTIAN MISOLA

    014 Phil 142

  • G.R. No. 5165 September 15, 1909 - GERVASIO UNSON v. SEGUNDO ABRERA

    014 Phil 146

  • G.R. No. 5185 September 15, 1909 - UNITED STATES v. BENITO MENESES

    014 Phil 151

  • G.R. No. 5150 September 16, 1909 - UNITED STATES v. MARCIANO LOPEZ

    014 Phil 155

  • G.R. No. 4236 September 18, 1909 - SANTIAGO TIU FIAN v. HILARIO YAP

    014 Phil 158

  • G.R. No. 4445 September 18, 1909 - CATALINA BUGNAO v. FRANCISCO UBAG, ET AL.

    014 Phil 163

  • G.R. No. 4609 September 18, 1909 - QUE YONG KENG v. RAFAEL TAN QUICO

    014 Phil 173

  • G.R. No. 4694 September 18, 1909 - ROMAN CATHOLIC ARCHBISHOP OF MANILA v. MUN. OF ROSARIO

    014 Phil 176

  • G.R. No. 4887 September 18, 1909 - UNITED STATES v. NICOLAS JAVELLANA, ET AL.

    014 Phil 186

  • G.R. No. 4973 September 18, 1909 - UNITED STATES v. BERNABE CATIPON, ET AL.

    014 Phil 188

  • G.R. No. 5003 September 18, 1909 - UNITED STATES v. FELIX DE JESUS

    014 Phil 190

  • G.R. No. 5262 September 18, 1909 - FRANCISCO ROSA HERNANDEZ, ET AL. v. MELECIO PADUA, ET AL.

    014 Phil 194

  • G.R. No. 4263 September 22, 1909 - UNITED STATES v. ESTEFANIA MENDOZA, ET AL.

    014 Phil 198

  • G.R. No. 4837 September 22, 1909 - FRANCISCO IMPERIAL v. JOSE ALEJANDRE

    014 Phil 203

  • G.R. No. 4234 September 23, 1909 - RUPERTA ORAIS v. JACINTA ESCAÑO

    014 Phil 208

  • G.R. No. 4759 September 23, 1909 - SEBASTIAN CABILLAS v. ALFONSO APDUHAN, ET AL.

    014 Phil 213

  • G.R. No. 4971 September 23, 1909 - UNITED STATES v. AUGUSTUS HICKS

    014 Phil 217

  • G.R. No. 5194 September 23, 1909 - CHINESE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE v. PUA TE CHING, ET AL.

    014 Phil 222

  • G.R. No. 5108 September 30, 1909 - UNITED STATES v. NICOMEDES MORALES

    014 Phil 227