Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence


Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence > Year 1969 > March 1969 Decisions > G.R. No. L-29343 March 28, 1969 - FELIPE DE GUZMAN v. WALFRIDO DE LOS ANGELES, ET AL.:




PHILIPPINE SUPREME COURT DECISIONS

EN BANC

[G.R. No. L-29343. March 28, 1969.]

FELIPE DE GUZMAN, Petitioner, v. HON. WALFRIDO DE LOS ANGELES, Judge CFI-Rizal, Branch IV, Quezon City, LEONARDO GERONIMO, MARIA LAZARO MARIANO, GLICERIA LAZARO MARIANO, The heirs of PERPETUO LAZARO MARIANO, THE PHILIPPINE TRUST COMPANY and THE COURT OF APPEALS, Respondents.


R E S O L U T I O N


DIZON, J.:


On August 8, 1968 petitioner Felipe de Guzman filed a petition to review the resolutions of the Court of Appeals dated March 19 and June 25, both of the year 1968. The first set aside the decision of said court of September 6, 1967, and the second affirmed the reversal of said decision and denied petitioner’s motion for reconsideration.

The respondents named in the petition for review, aside from the Court of Appeals, are the Honorable Walfrido de los Angeles, Judge of the Court of First Instance of Rizal, Branch IV, Q.C., the Philippine Trust Company, Leonardo Geronimo, Maria Lazaro Mariano, Gliceria Lazaro Mariano and the heirs of Perpetuo Lazaro Mariano.

It appears from the petition that in Special Proceedings No. Q- 573 "Intestate Estate of the Deceased Antonio Geronimo" of the Court of First Instance of Rizal, several parties appeared claiming to be the nearest kin of said decedent. Among them were respondent Leonardo Geronimo and the respondents Mariano. The first claimed to be a half- brother and the latter, relatives within the fifth degree of said decedent. Petitioner herein likewise appeared and asked for leave to intervene as claimant-creditor of the estate in view of alleged cash advances secured from him to be utilized solely for the purpose of prosecuting the case against the forger of the will of the decedent, claiming further in this connection that the efforts exerted by him and the persons who claimed to be the heirs of the decedent resulted in the conviction of the forger, this saving the estate from going into the latter’s hands. As a result, the original testate proceedings before the Court of First Instance of Rizal were converted into intestate proceedings. On August 26, 1961 the probate court allowed petitioner to intervene in said proceedings "it appearing that he has a legal interest in this case for the protection of his rights."cralaw virtua1aw library

The petition also alleges that the Court of First Instance of Rizal issued orders on January 30, April 5, April 24 and July 5, 1966 which in effect disposed of the entire properties of the estate, without the required publication of notices to the creditors of the estate, without making any previous declaration of heirs, without satisfying the obligations of the estate before ordering the distribution of its assets, and other alleged irregularities. To top all these, said Court later denied petitioner’s formal complaint for intervention in its order of August 24, 1965, from which order petitioner appealed to the Court of Appeals where the case was docketed as C.A.-G.R. No. 37061-R.

The petition alleges likewise that notwithstanding the appeal mentioned above, the lower court issued on November 24, 1965 an order directing execution of the basic orders complained of, as a result of which petitioner had to file special civil action in the same Court of Appeals (C.A.-G.R. No. 37306-R) to annul the orders of said Court in the aforesaid intestate proceedings dated January 30, April 5, April 24 and July 5, 1965 together with its subsequent orders for their implementation. The petition further alleges that on September 6, 1967 the Court of Appeals decided C.A.-G.R. No. 37306-R as follows:jgc:chanrobles.com.ph

"WHEREFORE, the questioned Orders of January 30, April 5, April 24, 1965, July 5, 1965, August 25, 1965, September 29, 1965, and all other subsequent orders issued for the implementation of the main orders mentioned, are hereby set aside for being null and void; ordering the Marianos who evidently appeared to be excluded heirs of the deceased Antonio Geronimo and therefore cannot be parties interested in the estate of the decedent, to deliver all the properties that were delivered to them by virtue of the questioned orders and to account for the proceeds and rentals thereof to the Philippine Trust Company which is hereby directed to take possession of the same and to render an inventory thereof; declaring said properties reverted to the estate of the decedent; and directing the respondent court to satisfy first the claim of herein petitioner against the estate of the decedent before any distribution of the estate of the decedent is made."cralaw virtua1aw library

However, on March 19, 1968 the Court of Appeals reversed its decision of September 6, 1967, which reversal was subsequently affirmed by another resolution of June 25, 1968. These resolutions of the respondent Court of Appeals are the ones which petitioner sought to have this Court review as stated at the outset.

The petition for review was given due course in our resolution of August 13, 1968 and after service of the proper notices for the filing of briefs, petitioner filed his on November 4, 1968 and respondents filed theirs on February 22, 1969.

On March 7, 1969 petitioner, through counsel, and with conformity of counsel for the Marianos, filed a pleading entitled "MOTION TO APPROVE AMICABLE SETTLEMENT, ENJOIN THE PARTIES TO COMPLY THEREWITH AND TO DISMISS," to which was attached the amicable settlement mentioned therein, executed on March 6, 1969 by petitioner Felipe de Guzman, on the one hand, and by Gliceria Lazaro Mariano, the heirs of Perpetuo Lazaro Mariano, namely, Pedro, Leonila, Carmelita, all surnamed Mariano, Feliciana Manalo vda. de Mariano, the heirs of Perpetuo Mariano, Jr., the heirs of Maria Lazaro Mariano, namely, Irma M., Zenaida M., Erlinda M. and Yolanda M., all surnamed Gulinao, respondents in G.R. No. L-29343 and legitimate heirs of the late Antonio Geronimo, as parties of the second part, and by Leonardo Geronimo, as party of the third part. The parties already named appear to have been assisted by their respective counsel in the execution of the amicable settlement which reads as follows:jgc:chanrobles.com.ph

"AMICABLE SETTLEMENT

KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS:chanrob1es virtual 1aw library

This AMICABLE SETTLEMENT entered into and executed on this 6th day of March, 1969, at Makati, Rizal, Philippines, by and between:chanrob1es virtual 1aw library

FELIPE DE GUZMAN, petitioner in G. R. No. L-29343, pending before the Supreme Court, entitled ‘Felipe de Guzman v. Hon. Walfrido de los Angeles, Et. Al.’ and intervenor in Sp. Proc. No. Q-573 of the Court of First Instance of Rizal, Quezon City Branch, entitled ‘Intestate Estate of Antonio Geronimo, Philippine Trust Co., Special Administrator,’ hereinafter referred to as the PARTY OF THE FIRST PART,

— and —

GLICERIA LAZARO MARIANO, the heirs of PERPETUO LAZARO MARIANO, namely, PEDRO MARIANO, LEONILA MARIANO, CARMELITA MARIANO, FELICIANA MANALO VDA. DE MARIANO, and PERPETUO MARIANO, JR,; and the heirs of MARIA LAZARO MARIANO, namely, IRMA M. GULINAO, ZENAIDA M. GULINAO, ERLINDA M. GULINAO and YOLANDA M. GULINAO, respondents in G. R. No. L- 29343 and legitimate heirs of the late Antonio Geronimo whose estate is being settled in Sp. Proc. No. Q-573, hereinafter called the PARTIES OF THE SECOND PART,

— and —

LEONARDO GERONIMO, respondent in G. R. No. L-29343 and one of the claimants in Sp. Proc. Q-573, hereinafter referred to as PARTY OF THE THIRD PART,

W I T N E S S E T H : That—

1. All the parties to this amicable settlement hereby voluntarily and freely express their desire to settle the cases G. R. No. L-29343 and Sp. Proc. No. Q-573 above referred to peacefully and amicably to their mutual and common advantage.

2. In consonance with the amicable settlement thus agreed among the parties hereto, the following terms and conditions are hereby stated and declared to be the binding convenants and agreements between and among them, to wit:chanrob1es virtual 1aw library

a) The PARTIES OF THE SECOND PART as the legitimate heirs of the late Antonio Geronimo, in consideration of the settlement of the above-said cases, G. R. No. L-29343 and Sp. Proc. No. Q-573, hereby confirm, ratify and give their consent to the ‘Contract to Sell’ dated June 6, 1955 executed by the PARTY OF THE THIRD PART in favor of the PARTY OF THE FIRST PART; and, as if they themselves executed the said ‘Contract to Sell’, they hereby cede, transfer and convey unto the PARTY OF THE FIRST PART, his heirs, successors, and assigns, the following property subject matter of the ‘Contract to Sell’, and its transfer certificate of title, together with all their rights and interests in said property, free from all liens and encumbrances of whatever nature:chanrob1es virtual 1aw library

‘A parcel of land situated at Rizal Avenue, Sta. Cruz, Manila, with an area of 126 square meters, more or less, known as Lot No. 5-d, Block 2260, of the subdivided property of the Government of the Philippines (Hacienda de Lazaro) with the improvements thereon, covered by TCT No. 29832 of the Registry of Deeds for the City of Manila.’

The PARTY OF THE THIRD PART confirms and acknowledges that he executed the ‘Contract to Sell’ above mentioned in favor of the PARTY OF THE FIRST PART freely and voluntarily for valuable consideration.

b) The PARTIES OF THE SECOND PART further convenant and agree to pay the sum of THIRTY THOUSAND (P30,000.00) PESOS, Philippine currency, TEN THOUSAND (P10,000.00) PESOS in cash upon the signing of this Amicable Settlement and the balance of TWENTY THOUSAND (P20,000.00) PESOS in a postdated Manila Banking Corporation check No. 02921M issued by Zenaida M. Gulinao payable within thirty (30) days from the signing hereof, and the PARTY OF THE FIRST PART acknowledges receipt of the said amount of TEN THOUSAND (P10,000.00) PESOS and accepts the same and the postdated manager’s check, together with the owner’s duplicate certificate of title to that parcel of land as conveyed and ceded to him par. 2 (a)hereinabove, in full and complete satisfaction and settlement of all the claims of said PARTY OF THE FIRST PART in G.R. No. L-29343 and in Sp. Proc. No. Q-573 as creditor of the estate, assignee of Leonardo Geronimo, and for advances made and services rendered by the PARTY OF THE FIRST PART in connection with the prosecution and conviction of Godofredo Jurado in Crim. Case No. 31725 of the Court of First Instance of Manila (CA-G.R. No. 20071- R) and the annulment of the alleged last will and testament of the late Antonio Geronimo, for all of which this amicable settlement serves as a quitclaim.

c) The PARTY OF THE FIRST PART hereby agrees to withdraw, upon approval of this Amicable Settlement, the petition for review which he filed with the Supreme Court bearing Case No. G. R. No. L-29343, as well as all his claims in Sp. Proc. No. Q-573, and to sign at the same time as this Amicable Settlement, the necessary pleadings for that purpose, which he hereby authorizes the PARTIES OF THE SECOND PART to file with the corresponding court.

d) It is understood that with this Amicable Settlement, the PARTY OF THE FIRST PART waives and relinquishes any and all rights he may have under the writ of preliminary injunction issued by the Court of Appeals in CA-G.R. No. 37306-R (now G.R. No. L-29343) dated April 1, 1966, and he agrees that Sp. Proc. No. Q-573 may now proceed until its termination, and the PARTIES OF THE SECOND PART may now sell, transfer, dispose of or otherwise deal with the properties of the late Antonio Geronimo transferred to them by virtue of the aforementioned orders of January 30, April 5, April 24 and July 5, all of 1965.

e) The PARTY OF THE FIRST PART hereby further agrees to have all the notices of lis pendens on the properties of the PARTIES OF THE FIRST PART and/or the estate of the late Antonio Geronimo that he filed in connection with G.R. No. L-29343 lifted, and for this purpose he is willing to execute, at the same time as this Amicable Settlement, the necessary papers or documents which he authorizes the PARTIES OF THE SECOND PART to file with the corresponding Register of Deeds.

f) This Amicable Settlement shall be in full force and effect upon the signing thereof by the parties, and hereafter, the PARTY OF THE FIRST PART shall in no case continue the prosecution of G.R. No. L-29343 or his claims in Sp. Proc. No. Q-573, or in any way prosecute or seek the satisfaction of his claims in the said cases as creditor of the estate of the late Antonio Geronimo, assignee of Leonardo Geronimo, and for advances made and services rendered by him in connection with the prosecution and conviction of Godofredo Jurado in Criminal Case No. 31725 of the Court of First Instance of Manila (CA- G.R. No. 20071-R) and the annulment of the alleged last will and testament of the late Antonio Geronimo.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto, assisted by their respective counsel, hereunto affix their signatures on the date and at the place first above mentioned."cralaw virtua1aw library

WHEREFORE, the above amicable settlement is hereby approved; the parties thereto are hereby enjoined to comply therewith; the present action is hereby dismissed, and the writ of preliminary injunction issued by the Court of Appeals on April 1, 1966 in C.A.-G.R. No. 37306-R is hereby dissolved.

Without costs.

Concepcion, C.J., Reyes, J.B.L., Makalintal, Zaldivar, Sanchez, Ruiz Castro, Fernando, Capistrano and Barredo, JJ., concur.

Teehankee, J., took no part.




Back to Home | Back to Main




















chanrobles.com





ChanRobles On-Line Bar Review

ChanRobles Internet Bar Review : www.chanroblesbar.com

ChanRobles MCLE On-line

ChanRobles Lawnet Inc. - ChanRobles MCLE On-line : www.chanroblesmcleonline.com






March-1969 Jurisprudence                 

  • G.R. No. L-26430 March 11, 1969 - ROSA GONZALEZ VDA. DE PALANCA, ET AL. v. CHUA KENG KIAN, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-29588 March 18, 1969 - ANTONIO J. VILLEGAS, ET AL. v. ABELARDO SUBIDO, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-26443 March 25, 1969 - MAKATI DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION v. PEDRO C. TANJUATCO, ET AL.

  • G.R. Nos. L-26770 & L-26771 March 25, 1969 - SAN ILDEFONSO ELECTRIC PLANT, INC. v. BALIUAG ELECTRIC LIGHT AND POWER CO., INC., ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-24985 March 27, 1969 - VICTORIAS MILLING CO., INC. v. BERTITO D. DADIVAS

  • G.R. No. L-24399 March 28, 1969 - FIRESTONE TIRE AND RUBBER COMPANY OF THE PHIL. v. FERNANDO TEMPONGKO

  • G.R. Nos. L-24634 & L-24635 March 28, 1969 - UNION OF PHILIPPINE EDUCATION EMPLOYEES v. PHILIPPINE EDUCATION CO., INC., ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-24699 March 28, 1969 - ABIGUEL REYES-GREGORIO, ET AL. v. ARSENIO REYES

  • G.R. No. L-24775 March 28, 1969 - MARIANO C. ATEGA v. MONTANO A. ORTIZ

  • G.R. No. L-24982 March 28, 1969 - BERNARDINA FLORENDO v. BONIFACIA FLORENDO, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-25333 March 28, 1969 - CONSOLIDATED WORKERS UNION v. COURT OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-25338 March 28, 1969 - UNION INSURANCE SOCIETY OF CANTON, LTD. v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL., ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-25439 March 28, 1969 - IN RE: CHUA TAN CHUAN v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL.

  • G.R. No. L-25555 March 28, 1969 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. DOMINGO MAGCAMIT

  • G.R. No. L-25618 March 28, 1969 - ABELARDO SUBIDO, ET AL. v. SIMEON GOPENGCO, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-25878 March 28, 1969 - PHILIPPINE ASSOCIATION OF FREE LABOR UNIONS v. GAUDENCIO CLORIBEL

  • G.R. No. L-26153 March 28, 1969 - GUALBERTO TENCHAVEZ v. ATLAS CONSOLIDATED MINING & DEVELOPMENT CO., ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-26487 March 28, 1969 - CONSTANTINA DE AGRAVIADOR, ET AL. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-26572 March 28, 1969 - MORALES DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, INC. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-26932 March 28, 1969 - RUPERTO SANCHEZ, ET AL. v. COURT OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-26953 March 28, 1969 - ZENAIDA MEDINA v. VENANCIA L. MAKABALI

  • G.R. No. L-26808 March 28, 1969 - LUCIO V. GARCIA v. CONRADO M. VASQUEZ

  • G.R. No. L-27100 March 28, 1969 - GERMAN S. MONTESA v. FELIPE ONOFRE DIRECTO, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-27120 March 28, 1969 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. JUAN L. BOCAR, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-27189 March 28, 1969 - FIREMAN’S FUND INSURANCE COMPANY v. MAERSK LINE FAR EAST SERVICE, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-27231 March 28, 1969 - ALFONSO VISITACION v. VICTOR MANIT, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-28113 March 28, 1969 - MUNICIPALITY OF MALABANG, ET AL. v. PANGANDAPUN BENITO, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-28734 March 28, 1969 - EMETERIO A. RODRIGUEZ v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-29199 March 28, 1969 - CLENIO L. ONDONA v. COMMISSION ON ELECTIONS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-29343 March 28, 1969 - FELIPE DE GUZMAN v. WALFRIDO DE LOS ANGELES, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-29610 March 28, 1969 - ALIM BALINDONG v. COMMISSION ON ELECTIONS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-29458 March 28, 1969 - VIRGINIA F. PEREZ v. RAFAEL DE LA CRUZ, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-29684 March 28, 1969 - ARACELI V. MALAG v. RAMON DE LOS CIENTOS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-29814 March 28, 1969 - SANTOS ANDAL, ET AL. v. PEOPLE OF THE PHIL.

  • G.R. No. L-29894 March 28, 1969 - JESUS W. LAZATIN v. RUPERTO KAPUNAN, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-30058 March 28, 1969 - LUIS G. DE CASTRO v. JULIAN G. GINETE, ET AL.

  • Adm.Case No. 598 March 28, 1969 - AURORA SORIANO DELES v. VICENTE E. ARAGONA, JR.

  • G.R. No. L-20017 March 28, 1969 - IN RE: LEON TE POOT v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL.

  • G.R. Nos. L-21213 & L-21214 March 28, 1969 - GABRIEL ZARI, ET AL. v. JOSE R. SANTOS

  • G.R. No. L-21291 March 28, 1969 - PRECIOLITA V. CORLISS v. MANILA RAILROAD CO.

  • G.R. Nos. L-21528 & L-21529 March 28, 1969 - ROSAURO REYES v. PEOPLE OF THE PHIL.

  • G.R. No. L-21664 March 28, 1969 - REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL., ET AL. v. MANOLO L. MADDELA, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-21953 March 28, 1969 - ENCARNACION GATIOAN v. SIXTO GAFFUD, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-22007 March 28, 1969 - NATIONAL MIRROR FACTORY v. ISIDRA SUNGA VDA. DE ANURE, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-22094 March 28, 1969 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. SANTIAGO TATLONGHARI, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-22187 March 28, 1969 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. ANASTACIO MAISUG, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-22619 March 28, 1969 - IN RE: EMMANUEL LAI, ET AL. v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL.

  • G.R. No. L-22687 March 28, 1969 - MALAYAN INSURANCE CO., INC. v. MANILA PORT SERVICE, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-22675 March 28, 1969 - PHILIPPINE NATIONAL BANK v. PACIFIC COMMISSION HOUSE

  • G.R. No. L-22706 March 28, 1969 - JOAQUIN UYPUANCO, ET AL. v. JOSE N. LEUTERIO, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-22784 March 28, 1969 - INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA v. OSAKA SHOSEN KAISHA, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-23253 March 28, 1969 - IN RE: PACITA CHUA v. BARTOLOME CABANGBANG, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-23591 March 28, 1969 - LEONCIO YU LIM v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL.

  • G.R. No. L-23654 March 28, 1969 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. VICENTE MARQUEZ

  • G.R. No. L-23792 March 28, 1969 - MODESTA JIMENEZ VDA. DE NOCETE v. PILAR OIRA

  • G.R. No. L-23942 March 28, 1969 - CARMEN DEVEZA, ET AL. v. JUAN B. MONTECILLO, ET AL.