Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence


Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence > Year 1975 > May 1975 Decisions > G.R. No. L-37378 May 30, 1975 - HIDELIZA C. CAMOMOT, ET AL. v. ROMULO SENINING, ET AL.:




PHILIPPINE SUPREME COURT DECISIONS

SECOND DIVISION

[G.R. No. L-37378. May 30, 1975.]

HIDELIZA C. CAMOMOT, and VICENTE MERCADO, Petitioners, v. HON. ROMULO SENINING, Presiding Judge of Branch I, City Court of Cebu City and LORENCIANA P. MERCADO, Respondents.

SYNOPSIS


Before the City Court of Cebu, petitioners were charged with and convicted of concubinage. The accused Vicente Mercado appealed to the Court of Appeals which subsequently modified the penalty imposed on him. Judgment became final, promulgation thereof was scheduled but the same could not be executed due to postponements sought by petitioners. Thereafter, the instant case was filed to declare void and set aside the proceedings of the trial court and the modified judgment of the Court of Appeals on the ground that arraignment was not held and that despite this, trial went on without the presence of the co-accused nor her counsel.

The Court issued a temporary retraining order but later ruled that issues were unmeritorious, in view of the trial court’s order for and certificate of arraignment and the transcripts of stenographic notes taken during the proceedings which disclose that petitioners were duly arraigned, tried and convicted.

Petition dismissed. Temporary restraining order dissolved.


SYLLABUS


1. CERTIORARI, PROHIBITION AND MANDAMUS; DISMISSAL OF PETITION FOR LACK OF MERIT; CASE AT BAR. — Petitioners seek to declare void and set aside proceedings held before the city court of Cebu which convicted them of concubinage and the modified decision of the Court of Appeals sustaining the same. They claim absence of arraignment and trial in the absence of the co-accused or her counsel. HELD: Petition dismissed. Writs prayed for denied for as shown in the trial court’s order of September 5, 1966 and the certificate of arraignment of the same date and pertinent portions of the stenographic notes taken during the proceedings, petitioners were duly arraigned, tried and convicted.


R E S O L U T I O N


CONCEPCION, JR., J.:


Petition for certiorari, prohibition and mandamus with a prayer for the issuance of a writ of preliminary injunction, filed by Hideliza C. Camomot and Vicente Mercado against Hon. Romulo Senining, Presiding Judge of Branch I, City Court of Cebu City, and Lorenciana Mercado, to declare void and to set aside all the proceedings of the respondent City Court which was then presided over by the former City Judge, Hon. Joaquin Maambong (now retired), as well as the decision of the Honorable Court of Appeals, affirming and modifying the said decision of the respondent City Court.

It appears that respondent Lorenciana Mercado filed a complaint for concubinage against petitioners in the City Court of Cebu City. On September 5, 1966, petitioners assisted by counsel and upon being arraigned entered a plea of not guilty. On the same date, the case was set for hearing on October 10, 1966 at 9:00 o’clock in the morning. Both accused and their counsel, together with Special City Counsel Graciano Lauron and private prosecutors F. Fernandez and Alberto Fernandez, were notified in open court of the hearing set for October 10, 1966. After trial the respondent court sentenced the accused Vicente Mercado to imprisonment of six (6) months and one (1) day of prision correccional and his co-accused, Hideliza Camomot, to a penalty of destierro for the same period of time. Upon Vicente Mercado’s appeal to the Court of Appeals, the decision of the City Court was modified and the penalty of four (4) months and 20 days of arresto mayor, as minimum, to two (2) years, 11 months and 10 days of prision correccional, as maximum, was imposed on him. The decision of the Court of Appeals which has already become final and executory and which was set for promulgation for three times in the sala of respondent City Judge, Hon. Romulo Senining, could not be executed by virtue of the several postponements filed by Atty. Honorato Hermosisima and petitioners’ counsel Atty. Jesus Blanca.

On August 27, 1973, the instant petition was filed by Hideliza C. Camomot and Vicente Mercado claiming that they were not notified of the scheduled arraignment on September 5, 1966; that despite the absence of arraignment of accused (herein petitioners), then Presiding Judge, Hon. Joaquin Maambong, proceeded with the trial of the case on October 25, 1966; that during the initial hearing on October 25, 1966 and in all subsequent hearings thereafter, Hideliza Camomot was never present, nor was she represented by counsel.

By virtue of the temporary restraining order issued by this court on August 29, 1973, the respondent Hon. Romulo Senining of the City Court, Branch I of Cebu City was restrained from promulgating and/or reading the aforementioned modified decision of the Court of Appeals which was set on August 30, 1973 at 8:30 in the morning.

In connection with the issues thus raised by petitioners, we find that the accused Hideliza Camomot and Vicente Mercado in Criminal Case No. 1597-R were in fact duly arraigned and represented by counsel as shown in the Order of September 5, 1966 1 and the Certificate of Arraignment of the same date. 2

Furthermore, pertinent portions of the transcript of stenographic notes taken during the proceedings, disclose that both petitioners were duly arraigned, tried and convicted by the trial court; that during these proceedings they were both present and assisted by counsel; 3 and that said decision was sustained by the Court of Appeals which decision is now final and executory.

IN VIEW OF ALL THE FOREGOING, the petition under consideration is dismissed and the writs prayed for are denied, with costs.

The temporary restraining order issued by this Court is hereby dissolved.

SO ORDERED.

Fernando (Chairman), Barredo, Antonio and Aquino, JJ., concur.

Endnotes:



1. p. 79, Rollo.

2. p. 80, rollo.

3. pp. 81-87, rollo




Back to Home | Back to Main




















chanrobles.com





ChanRobles On-Line Bar Review

ChanRobles Internet Bar Review : www.chanroblesbar.com

ChanRobles MCLE On-line

ChanRobles Lawnet Inc. - ChanRobles MCLE On-line : www.chanroblesmcleonline.com






May-1975 Jurisprudence                 

  • G.R. No. L-29129 May 8, 1975 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. DOMINGO MABUYO

  • G.R. No. L-33516 May 8, 1975 - MARIANO RODRIGUEZ v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-37364 May 9, 1975 - BENIGNO S. AQUINO, JR. v. MILITARY COMMISSION NO. 2, ET AL.

  • A.C. No. 547 January 29, 1975 - EMERENCIANA V. REYES v. FELIPE C. WONG

  • G.R. No. L-27674 May 12, 1975 - SOLEDAD T. CONSING, ET AL. v. JOSE T. JAMANDRE

  • G.R. No. L-40143 May 12, 1975 - MARIANO G. HIQUIANA v. COMMISSION ON ELECTIONS

  • A.M. No. 487-CAR May 13, 1975 - ROMULO G. LOPEZ v. GETULIO Z. GUEVARA

  • G.R. No. L-25048 May 13, 1975 - PHOENIX ASSURANCE COMPANY v. MACONDRAY & CO., INC.

  • G.R. No. L-34314 May 13, 1975 - SOFIA PASTOR DE MIDGELY v. PIO B. FERANDOS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-38096 May 14, 1975 - CONCEPCION T. UY v. WORKMEN’S COMPENSATION COMMISSION, ET AL.

  • A.M. No. 77-MJ May 16, 1975 - JUAN B. CASTILLO v. TEOFILO A. BARSANA

  • A.M. No. P-124 May 16, 1975 - SOLEDAD V. GANADEN v. GREGORIO N. BOLASCO

  • G.R. No. L-39195 May 16, 1975 - SAN MIGUEL CORPORATION, ET AL. v. SECRETARY OF LABOR, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-39569 May 16, 1975 - CROMWEL DENILA, ET AL. v. JOSUE BELLOSILLO, ET AL.

  • A.M. No. 804-CJ May 19, 1975 - SATURNINO SELANOVA v. ALEJANDRO E. MENDOZA

  • A.C. No. 1081 May 19, 1975 - ABUNDIO BALDOMAN v. ROQUE LUSPO

  • G.R. No. L-20203 May 19, 1975 - LA CARLOTA SUGAR CENTRAL v. COURT OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-26191 May 19, 1975 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. EDUARDO BESANA, JR.

  • G.R. No. L-39993 May 19, 1975 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. CONSTANTE A. ANCHETA

  • A.M. No. 534-CFI May 20, 1975 - LYDIA S. NOCUM v. WILLELMO C. FORTUN

  • G.R. No. L-28649 May 21, 1975 - FRANCISCO J. NICOLAS v. REPARATIONS COMMISSION, ET AL.

  • G.R. Nos. L-33720-21 May 21, 1975 - PHILIPPINE BRITISH CO., INC., ET AL. v. WALFRIDO DE LOS ANGELES, ET AL.

  • A.M. No. 411-MJ May 22, 1975 - ERNESTO R. GONZALES v. VICENTE DE RODA OF BOGO, CEBU

  • G.R. No. L-32080 May 22, 1975 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. AGUSTIN ALQUISAR, ET. AL., ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-36022 May 22, 1975 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. IGNACIO JOVEN

  • G.R. No. L-39115 May 26, 1975 - SEGIFREDO L. ACLARACION v. MAGNO S. GATMAITAN, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-40010 May 26, 1975 - RUSSEL R. ENERIO, ET AL. v. NESTOR B. ALAMPAY, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-25921 May 27, 1975 - VANGUARD ASSURANCE CORPORATION v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • A.M. No. 41-MJ May 28, 1975 - ALFREDO ARPON v. ARISTIDES B. DE LA PAZ, ET AL.

  • A.C. No. P-242 May 28, 1975 - PEDRO PINEDA v. MARIO A. HIZALAN

  • A.M. No. 429-MJ May 28, 1975 - GASPAR PARENTE v. FERNANDO DE LOS SANTOS

  • G.R. No. L-29128 May 28, 1975 - DOMINGA JAVIER, ET AL. v. SABAS MARFIL, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-36560 May 28, 1975 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. PAULINO ILAGAN, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-39764 May 28, 1975 - ONG TIAO SENG v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS COMMISSION, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-40491 May 28, 1975 - SEGUNDO AMANTE v. DELFIN VIR. SUÑGA

  • A.C. No. 203-CJ May 29, 1975 - PABLO MARCOS v. ANDRES DOMINGO, ET AL.

  • A.M. No. 253-MJ May 29, 1975 - ALFONSO S. AUSEJO, ET AL. v. GAUDENCIO P. PAJUNAR

  • G.R. No. L-24522 May 29, 1975 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. NUMERIANO G. ESTENZO

  • G.R. No. L-27534 May 29, 1975 - ATLAS TIMBER COMPANY, ET AL. v. FIRST WESTERN BANK AND TRUST CO.

  • G.R. No. L-31041 May 20, 1975 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. JUANITO C. ALDE

  • G.R. No. L-39863 May 29, 1975 - MANUEL GARCIA, ET AL. v. TOMAS R. LEONIDAS, ET AL.

  • A.C. No. 111-MJ May 30, 1975 - FELIX CARREON v. BRUNO R. FLORES

  • A.M. No. 810-CJ May 30, 1975 - JOSE KUAN SING v. ROSENDO BALTAZAR

  • A.M. No. 852-MJ May 30, 1975 - FELISBERTO ALEGRE v. RHODIE A. NIDEA

  • A.C. No. 905 May 30, 1975 - HERMOGENES G. MENDOZA v. ARSENIO R. REYES

  • G.R. No. L-25779 May 30, 1975 - SOCIAL SECURITY SYSTEM v. VALDERRAMA LUMBER MANUFACTURERS CO., INC.

  • G.R. No. L-26507 May 30, 1975 - LAKAS NG MANGGAGAWANG MAKABAYAN v. WALFRIDO DELOS ANGELES

  • G.R. No. L-37378 May 30, 1975 - HIDELIZA C. CAMOMOT, ET AL. v. ROMULO SENINING, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-38502 May 30, 1975 - PIO B. FERANDOS v. JUAN Y. REYES, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-39741 May 30, 1975 - NATION MULTI SERVICE LABOR UNION, ET AL. v. MARIANO V. AGCAOILI, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-40187 May 30, 1975 - GENERAL TEXTILES, INC. v. WORKMEN’S COMPENSATION COMMISSION, ET AL.