August 1903 - Philippine Supreme Court Decisions/Resolutions
Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence
Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence > Year 1903 > August 1903 Decisions >
G.R. No. 1208 August 6, 1903 - UNITED STATES v. JOSE QUEVENGCO
002 Phil 412:
002 Phil 412:
EN BANC
[G.R. No. 1208. August 6, 1903. ]
THE UNITED STATES, Complainant-Appellee, v. JOSE QUEVENGCO, Defendant-Appellant.
Claudio Gabriel for Appellant.
Solicitor-General Araneta for Appellee.
SYLLABUS
1. CRIMINAL LAW; ILLEGAL DETENTION; DEGREE OF RESTRAINT. — The defendant compelled the complaining witness to go to his house. While there she was not confined to the building, but was allowed to come and go on the estate. Held, That these facts do not show such deprivation of liberty as to constitute the crime of illegal detention.
2. ID.; COERCION; AGGRAVATING CIRCUMSTANCE. — The defendant, having compelled the complaining witness to go to his house against her will is guilty of the crime of coercion, with the aggravating circumstance of sex.
3. ID.; PRACTICE. — That form of coercion which consists in compelling one to do something against his will being necessarily included in the higher offense of illegal detention, an information for the latter crime is sufficient to sustain a conviction for the former.
2. ID.; COERCION; AGGRAVATING CIRCUMSTANCE. — The defendant, having compelled the complaining witness to go to his house against her will is guilty of the crime of coercion, with the aggravating circumstance of sex.
3. ID.; PRACTICE. — That form of coercion which consists in compelling one to do something against his will being necessarily included in the higher offense of illegal detention, an information for the latter crime is sufficient to sustain a conviction for the former.
D E C I S I O N
WILLARD, J. :
Sotera Jico was in the house of the defendant for three days. During that time she was employed as a servant therein, had the freedom of the house, and left it at times to visit her mother, who lived upon the same estate. At those times she was accompanied only by a small child. These facts do not show the commission of the crime of detencion ilegal.
She was, by the servants of the defendant and a soldier of the Constabulary, compelled, against her will, to leave her house and go with them, in company with her aunt, to the defendant’s house. these facts prove the commission of the crime of coaccion, punished by article 497 of the Penal Code.
The offense charged in the complaint is detencion ilegal. That crime can not be committed without committing that form of coaccion which consists in compelling one to do what he does not wish to do. The latter is therefore necessarily included in the former, and under this complaint for detencion ilegal the defendant can be convicted of this form of coaccion, (G.O., No. 58, sec. 29.)
The aggravating circumstance of sex, mentioned in No. 20 of article 10 of the Penal Code, should be taken into consideration.
The judgment below is reversed and the defendant is found guilty of the crime of coaccion, and is sentenced to six months of arresto mayor, to a fine of 325 pesetas, and the payment of 25 pesos as indemnity to said Sotera Jico, and to the payment of costs.
Arellano, C.J., Torres, Cooper, Mapa and McDonough, JJ., concur.
She was, by the servants of the defendant and a soldier of the Constabulary, compelled, against her will, to leave her house and go with them, in company with her aunt, to the defendant’s house. these facts prove the commission of the crime of coaccion, punished by article 497 of the Penal Code.
The offense charged in the complaint is detencion ilegal. That crime can not be committed without committing that form of coaccion which consists in compelling one to do what he does not wish to do. The latter is therefore necessarily included in the former, and under this complaint for detencion ilegal the defendant can be convicted of this form of coaccion, (G.O., No. 58, sec. 29.)
The aggravating circumstance of sex, mentioned in No. 20 of article 10 of the Penal Code, should be taken into consideration.
The judgment below is reversed and the defendant is found guilty of the crime of coaccion, and is sentenced to six months of arresto mayor, to a fine of 325 pesetas, and the payment of 25 pesos as indemnity to said Sotera Jico, and to the payment of costs.
Arellano, C.J., Torres, Cooper, Mapa and McDonough, JJ., concur.
