Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence


Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence > Year 1904 > April 1904 Decisions > G.R. No. 1596 April 22, 1904 - UNITED STATES v. HILARIO ZAFRA ET. AL.

004 Phil 71:




PHILIPPINE SUPREME COURT DECISIONS

FIRST DIVISION

[G.R. No. 1596. April 22, 1904. ]

THE UNITED STATES, Complainant-Appellee, v. HILARIO ZAFRA ET. AL., Defendants-Appellants.

Jose del Castillo for Appellants.

Solicitor-General Araneta for Appellee.

SYLLABUS


CRIMINAL LAW; BRIGANDAGE. — The fact that the band of which the accused were members was organized for political purposes is not a defense to charge of brigandage, where the evidence shows that this band, provided with firearms and other weapons, wandered about the country and engaged in robbery and other offenses against persons and property and in armed resistance to the authorities, and that the accused took part in the commission of some of these crimes.


D E C I S I O N


TORRES, J. :


October 6, 1903, the provincial fiscal of the Province of Rizal filed an information with the Court of First Instance accusing Hilario Zafra, Basilio Capistrano, and Carlos San Diego of the crime of insurrection (the original information, filed in the justice’s court, charges them with brigandage) in that the accused, in or about the year 1902, until they were captured early in 1903, within the jurisdiction of the township of Meycauayan, willfully and illegally promoted and abetted an insurrection against the Government of the United States in the Philippine Islands, contrary to the statute in the case made and provided.

This information was amended October 23, 1903, before trial, by the provincial fiscal, who filed another information against the three defendants charging them with the crime of brigandage in that they on or about after (sic) the 12th of November, 1902, and until they were captured in Bulacan in the months of May or June, 1903, they, the defendants, had willfully and voluntarily been members of a band of thieves under the command of the so-called General San Miguel, and subject to the immediate orders of Ciriaco Contreras, Julian Santos, and others, who were engaged in the robbery of personal property by force and violence, and wandered about the roads armed with deadly weapons, contrary to the statute in the case made and provided.

The amended information having been filed and the accuse arraigned thereon, they pleaded not guilty. Upon the evidence introduced at the trial the court convicted them and sentenced them each to twenty-four years’ imprisonment, and to the payment of the costs, from which judgment the defendants appealed.

From the proceedings had in the course of the trial it appears that the witnesses Ricardo Aquino, Gervasio Gimenez, Enrique Pasion, and Jorge San Pedro were acquainted with Hilario Zafra, and knew him to be one of the members of the band lead by Faustino Guillermo, which band was operating in the Provinces of Bulacan and Rizal, in combination with the bands lead by Ciriaco Contreras and Julian Santos. These different bands, composed in all of about one hundred men, were armed with firearms and other weapons, and recognized the so-called general, San Miguel, as the principal leader.

The other witnesses, Miguel Pascual, Marcelo Magsalin, and the witnesses above named, Enrique Pasion and Jorge San Pedro, also testified that the accused Basilio Capistrano and Carlos San Diego were members of the Contreras gang, a band composed of armed men which, together with other smaller bands, under the command of Faustino Guillermo, Julian Santos, and Apolonio Samson, wandered about the country in the Provinces of Rizal and Bulacan, and that these smaller bands recognized Luciano San Miguel as their chief.

From the facts stated it appears that the evidence is sufficient to disclose the existence of the crime of brigandage, and to show that the defendants were members of bands composed of more than three armed men which early in the year 1903 wandered about the Provinces of Bulacan and Rizal, engaged in robbery and other crimes against person and property, and in making resistance to the authorities.

Even if it were true that the said bands were organized with a political character, and that their purpose, as testified to by several witnesses, was to defend their country, and that the accused Capistrano and San Diego were captured by these bands — although this alleged capture has not been proven — the fact nevertheless remains that the accused, under arms, took part in the acts of vandalism committed by the various parties of the numerous bands under the general command of Luciano San Miguel and his subordinates, Guillermo, Contreras, Samson, and Santos. The evidence shows that these accused committed a robbery one night in stores of four Chinamen in Meycauayan; that they assaulted and robbed the office of the president of Navotas, from which they took $195 in cash and some arms; that they attacked the Constabulary barracks in the town of Santa Maria, and took therefrom guns, clothing, and rice; that they killed two Constabulary soldiers in the town of Pasig, and robbed several of the inhabitants; that they stole three carabaos belonging to an inhabitant of San Miguel, and furthermore that they are guilty of armed resistance to and attacks upon the agents of the authorities. These facts appear from the testimony of the witnesses named. Consequently there can be no doubt that the three defendants are guilty of the offense defined and punished by section 1 of Act No. 518, enacted November 12, 1902.

For the reasons stated it is our opinion that the judgment appealed must be affirmed, with one-third of the costs of both instances to the defendants. The case will be remanded to the trial court with a certified copy of this opinion and of the judgment to be entered in accordance therewith for its execution. So ordered.

Arellano, C.J., Mapa, McDonough and Johnson, JJ., concur.




Back to Home | Back to Main




















chanrobles.com





ChanRobles On-Line Bar Review

ChanRobles Internet Bar Review : www.chanroblesbar.com

ChanRobles MCLE On-line

ChanRobles Lawnet Inc. - ChanRobles MCLE On-line : www.chanroblesmcleonline.com






April-1904 Jurisprudence                 

  • G.R. No. 1656 April 2, 1904 - UNITED STATES v. MARIANO DE LA CRUZ

    003 Phil 573

  • G.R. No. 1627 April 2, 1904 - UNITED STATES v. GEORGE WASHINGTON

    003 Phil 575

  • G.R. No. 1107 April 2, 1904 - IN RE: AUGUSTUS A. MONTAGNE & FRANK E. DOMINGUEZ

    003 Phil 577

  • G.R. No. 1490 April 2, 1904 - O. F. CAMPBELL AND GO-TAUCO v. BEHN, MEYER & CO.

    003 Phil 590

  • G.R. No. 1132 April 2, 1904 - MARTINIANO M. VELOSO v. PETRONA NAGUIT, ET AL.

    003 Phil 604

  • G.R. No. 1645 April 4, 1904 - UNITED STATES v. HOGU REYES, ET AL.

    003 Phil 611

  • G.R. No. 1564 April 5, 1904 - UNITED STATES v. PEDRO DE LA PATA, ET AL.

    003 Phil 612

  • G.R. No. 1625 April 7, 1904 - UNITED STATES v. EULALIO BUNDOC, ET AL.

    003 Phil 614

  • G.R. No. 1462 April 8, 1904 - LA RAZON SOCIAL DE HIJOS DE I. DE LA RAMA v. ROSENDO LACSON

    003 Phil 618

  • G.R. No. 1587 April 8, 1904 - UNITED STATES v. MAXIMO DALAWAN

    003 Phil 620

  • G.R. No. 1673 April 8, 1904 - PETRONILA ENCARNACION v. B. S. AMBLER

    003 Phil 623

  • G.R. No. 1542 April 9, 1904 - UNITED STATES v. CORNELIO DEVELA, ET AL.

    003 Phil 625

  • G.R. No. 1559 April 9, 1904 - UNITED STATES v. LORENZO ALBANO

    003 Phil 630

  • G.R. No. 1585 April 9, 1904 - UNITED STATES v. ESTEBAN VIRAY

    003 Phil 631

  • G.R. No. 1586 April 9, 1904 - UNITED STATES v. FELIPE NAVARRO

    003 Phil 633

  • G.R. No. 1905 April 9, 1904 - FLAVIANO FELIZARDO, ET AL. v. JUSTICE OF THE PEACE OF IMUS

    003 Phil 635

  • G.R. No. 1326 April 9, 1904 - FELIX FANLO AZNAR v. W. F. NORRIS

    003 Phil 636

  • G.R. No. 1614 April 9, 1904 - UNITED STATES v. ANACLETO EMBATE

    003 Phil 640

  • G.R. No. 1535 April 11, 1904 - UNITED STATES v. JUAN GINETE

    003 Phil 641

  • G.R. No. 1447 April 12, 1904 - UNITED STATES v. PERFECTO DE LEON, ET AL.

    003 Phil 645

  • G.R. No. 1573 April 12, 1904 - UNITED STATES v. TOMAS DE GUZMAN

    003 Phil 654

  • G.R. No. 1620 April 12, 1904 - UNITED STATES v. FAUSTINO GUILLERMO

    003 Phil 657

  • G.R. No. 1318 April 12, 1904 - PRISCA NAVAL, ET AL. v. FRANCISCO ENRIQUEZ, ET AL.

    003 Phil 669

  • G.R. No. 1547 April 12, 1904 - UNITED STATES v. SANTIAGO MANIQUE, ET AL.

    003 Phil 675

  • G.R. No. 1574 April 13, 1904 - UNITED STATES v. CHOA CHI CO

    003 Phil 678

  • G.R. No. 1529 April 13, 1904 - ESTEFANIA VILLAR v. MUNICIPAL BOARD OF MANILA

    003 Phil 681

  • G.R. No. 1492 April 15, 1904 - TAN MACHAN v. MARIA GAN AYA DE LA TRINIDAD, ET AL.

    003 Phil 684

  • G.R. No. 1603 April 15, 1904 - UNITED STATES v. FLAVIANO SIMEON

    003 Phil 688

  • G.R. No. 1688 April 15, 1904 - FINDLAY & CO. v. BYRON S. AMBLER

    003 Phil 690

  • G.R. No. 1329 April 15, 1904 - UNITED STATES v. RAFAEL SAMIO

    003 Phil 691

  • G.R. No. 1362 April 15, 1904 - ROSA LLORENTE v. CEFERINO RODRIGUEZ

    003 Phil 697

  • G.R. No. 1356 April 15, 1904 - UNITED STATES v. CHARLES BARNES

    003 Phil 704

  • G.R. No. 1412 April 15, 1904 - UNITED STATES v. J. C. WINEBRENNER

    003 Phil 705

  • G.R. No. 1853 April 16, 1904 - UNITED STATES v. JOHN P. MILLER

    003 Phil 708

  • G.R. No. 1479 April 16, 1904 - UNITED STATES v. VICTORINA DE LOS SANTOS

    003 Phil 710

  • G.R. No. 1501 April 16, 1904 - UNITED STATES v. CANUTO BUTARDO

    003 Phil 712

  • G.R. No. 1546 April 16, 1904 - UNITED STATES v. FELIPE RAMA

    003 Phil 716

  • G.R. No. 1590 April 16, 1904 - UNITED STATES v. TELESFORO RORALDO, ET AL.

    003 Phil 719

  • G.R. No. 1646 April 16, 1904 - UNITED STATES v. VENTURA MARIANO

    003 Phil 723

  • G.R. No. 1552 April 22, 1904 - UNITED STATES v. DAVID TOMULAC

    003 Phil 728

  • G.R. No. 1592 April 22, 1904 - UNITED STATES v. APOLONIO NATIVIDAD

    003 Phil 732

  • G.R. No. 1705 April 22, 1904 - TOMAS BLANCO v. BYRON S. AMBLER

    003 Phil 735

  • G.R. No. 1779 April 22, 1904 - FRANCISCO GUTIERREZ REPIDE v. JOHN C. SWEENEY

    003 Phil 738

  • G.R. No. 1385 April 22, 1904 - RAFAEL ENRIQUEZ ET AL. v. FRANCISCO ENRIQUEZ ET AL.

    003 Phil 746

  • G.R. No. 1477 April 22, 1904 - MARIA GONZALEZ v. SIMEON BLAS

    003 Phil 749

  • G.R. No. 1505 April 22, 1904 - UNITED STATES v. VALENTIN BUTARDO, ET AL.

    003 Phil 751

  • G.R. No. 1110 April 22, 1904 - ROMAN SARMIENTO v. MORTGAGE & DOMINGUEZ

    004 Phil 1

  • G.R. No. 1184 April 22, 1904 - COMPAÑIA AGRICOLA DE ULTRAMAR v. ANACLETO REYES ET AL.

    004 Phil 2

  • G.R. No. 1244 April 22, 1904 - COMPAÑIA GENERAL DE TABACOS DE FILIPINAS v. MIGUEL TOPINO ET AL.

    004 Phil 33

  • G.R. No. 1596 April 22, 1904 - UNITED STATES v. HILARIO ZAFRA ET. AL.

    004 Phil 71

  • G.R. No. 1616 April 22, 1904 - JUAN CAÑIZARES HIVA v. THE PHILIPPINE TRADING COMPANY

    004 Phil 74

  • G.R. No. 1626 April 22, 1904 - UNITED STATES v. HERMOGENES ONTI

    004 Phil 78

  • G.R. No. 1806 April 22, 1904 - SERVILIANO LANZUELA SANTOS v. JOHN C. SWEENEY

    004 Phil 79

  • G.R. No. 1810 April 22, 1904 - EULOGIO GARCIA v. B. S. AMBLER

    004 Phil 81