Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence


Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence > Year 1904 > February 1904 Decisions > G.R. No. 1446 February 17, 1904 - UNITED STATES v. AMBROSIO DE LA CRUZ

003 Phil 337:




PHILIPPINE SUPREME COURT DECISIONS

EN BANC

[G.R. No. 1446. February 17, 1904. ]

THE UNITED STATES, Complainant-Appellee, v. AMBROSIO DE LA CRUZ, Defendant-Appellant.

Ambrosio R. Baustista, for Appellant.

Solicitor-General Araneta, for Appellee.

SYLLABUS


1. CRIMINAL LAW; RAPE; ATTEMPT. — See facts in this case: Held, sufficient to sustain a conviction for attempted rape.

2. ID.; ID.; ID.; PENALTY; MINOR. — The penalty for the consummated crime of rape being reclusion temporal, that corresponding to the attempt to commit the crime is two degrees lower, viz, prision correccional, which, when the defendant is between the ages of 15 and 18 years, by reason of that fact must be further reduced to arresto mayor.


D E C I S I O N


JOHNSON, J. :


The defendant in this case was charged with the crime of attempted rape.

The evidence discloses the fact that on the 20th of July, 1903, the accused went to the house where one Paula de los Santos lived, at about 8 o’clock at night, and entered the house without the permission of the said Paula. After the accused entered the house he took hold of her and threw her upon the floor. Paula at once cried for help. Her aunt was in the house with her at that time and saw the accused enter the house, but was afraid to go to her help when she heard her cries. One Apolinar Acosta, who lived in an adjoining house, hearing the cries of Paula, ran immediately to her aid. When Apolinar Acosta entered the house where Paula was he found the accused struggling with her, both being upon the floor. The mother of Paula, who was in an adjoining house, also heard the cries of her daughter, Paula, for help, on this same occasion.

The evidence shows that Paula was about 15 years of age and the accused was about 16 years of age. The evidence further shows that the accused had visited the house of Paula before this night and desired to marry her.

The position in which the accused was found upon the floor with Paula by Apolinar Acosta at the time he, Apolinar Acosta, answered her cries, clearly indicates that the accused intended to commit the crime charged in the said complaint.

The judge of the Court of First Instance, after hearing the testimony, found the defendant guilty of the crime of attempted rape and sentenced him to be imprisoned for the term of two years and six months of prision correccional, with the costs.

Article 438 of the Penal Code provides that those who shall be found guilty of the crime of rape shall be punished with the penalty of reclusion temporal.

Article 66 of the Penal Code provides that those who are found guilty of an attempt to commit a crime shall be punished by the penalty two degrees lower than that prescribed by law for the consummated crime.

Inasmuch as the evidence shows that the defendant is guilty of the attempt to commit a crime only, then by virtue of article 66 of the said code, he should be punished with the penalty of prision correccional.

The evidence discloses the fact that the accused was but 16 years of age. Subsection 1 of article 85 of the said code provides that persons under 18 years of age and over 15 years of age shall be punished with the penalty one degree lower than that prescribed by law. By virtue of this last-quoted provision of the Penal Code, then, the penalty of arresto mayor should be imposed.

The offense was committed at nighttime. This should be appreciated as an aggravating circumstance.

There being no extenuating circumstances and one aggravating circumstance, the court must impose the maximum degree by virtue of subsection 3 of article 81 of the Penal Code. Therefore, by virtue of the foregoing provisions of the law and facts, the court does hereby modify the sentence of the Court of First Instance of the Province of Rizal and does hereby sentence the accused, Ambrosio de la Cruz, to six months of arresto mayor and to pay the cost of both instances.

Arellano, C.J., Torres, Cooper, Willard, Mapa and McDonough, JJ., concur.




Back to Home | Back to Main




















chanrobles.com





ChanRobles On-Line Bar Review

ChanRobles Internet Bar Review : www.chanroblesbar.com

ChanRobles MCLE On-line

ChanRobles Lawnet Inc. - ChanRobles MCLE On-line : www.chanroblesmcleonline.com






February-1904 Jurisprudence                 

  • G.R. Nos. 1561 & 1562 February 2, 1904 - RAFAEL ENRIQUEZ v. A. S. WATSON & CO. ET AL.

    003 Phil 279

  • G.R. No. 1300 February 3, 1904 - E. C. McCULLOUGH v. R. AENLLE & Co.

    003 Phil 285

  • G.R. No. 1444 February 4, 1904 - UNITED STATES v. SEVERO ALCANTARA, ET AL.

    003 Phil 309

  • G.R. No. 1693 February 5, 1904 - FRANCISCO GARCIA v. JOHN C. SWEENEY

    004 Phil 751

  • G.R. No. 1464 February 11, 1904 - UNITED STATES v. MAXIMO OANGOANG, ET AL.

    003 Phil 312

  • G.R. No. 1522 February 11, 1904 - UNITED STATES v. POLICARPO IDICA

    003 Phil 313

  • G.R. No. 1548 February 11, 1904 - UNITED STATES v. PAULINO GARCIA, ET AL.

    003 Phil 317

  • G.R. No. 1368 February 12, 1904 - UNITED STATES v. FRED FREIMUTH

    003 Phil 318

  • G.R. No. 1399 February 12, 1904 - UNITED STATES v. NORBERTO OBREGON

    003 Phil 320

  • G.R. No. 1513 February 12, 1904 - UNITED STATES v. CASIANO SADIAN

    003 Phil 323

  • G.R. No. 1437 February 13, 1904 - UNITED STATES v. AGATON AMBATA, ET AL.

    003 Phil 327

  • G.R. No. 1460 February 16, 1904 - UNITED STATES v. MAXIMO GUILLERMO

    003 Phil 329

  • G.R. No. 1478 February 16, 1904 - UNITED STATES v. JUAN DE LA CRUZ, ET AL.

    003 Phil 331

  • G.R. No. 1480 February 16, 1904 - UNITED STATES v. FRANCISCO DE LA CRUZ, ET AL.

    003 Phil 332

  • G.R. No. 1509 February 16, 1904 - UNITED STATES v. NICOLAS GLORIA

    003 Phil 333

  • G.R. No. 1446 February 17, 1904 - UNITED STATES v. AMBROSIO DE LA CRUZ

    003 Phil 337

  • G.R. No. 1481 February 17, 1903

    UNITED STATES v. LIBERATO EXALTACION, ET AL.

    003 Phil 339

  • G.R. No. 1092 February 18, 1904 - LUIS QUERIDO v. RAMON FLORENDO, ET AL.

    003 Phil 342

  • G.R. No. 1372 February 20, 1903

    JOHN E. SPRINGER v. ARTHUR F. ODLIN

    003 Phil 344

  • G.R. No. 1434 February 23, 1904 - UNITED STATES v. ANTONIO DE LOS REYES

    003 Phil 349

  • G.R. No. 1532 February 23, 1904 - UNITED STATES v. CASIMIRO GASAL

    003 Phil 354

  • G.R. No. 1705 February 23, 1904 - TOMAS BLANCO v. BYRON S. AMBLER

    003 Phil 358

  • G.R. No. 1293 February 23, 1904 - ILDELFONSO DORONILA v. JOSE LOPEZ

    003 Phil 360

  • G.R. No. 1498 February 24, 1904 - UNITED STATES v. MARTIN CABUENAS

    003 Phil 366

  • G.R. No. 1493 February 25, 1904 - UNITED STATES v. BERNARDO USIS, ET AL.

    003 Phil 373

  • G.R. No. 1506 February 26, 1904 - UNITED STATES v. FACUNDO PINEDA, ET AL.

    003 Phil 376

  • G.R. No. 1482 February 29, 1904 - UNITED STATES v. ANTONIO FERNANDEZ

    003 Phil 380