Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence


Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence > Year 1905 > February 1905 Decisions > G.R. No. 1728 February 15, 1905 - UNITED STATES v. ANTONIO DALUSONG

004 Phil 216:




PHILIPPINE SUPREME COURT DECISIONS

EN BANC

[G.R. No. 1728. February 15, 1905. ]

THE UNITED STATES, Complainant-Appellee, v. ANTONIO DALUSONG, Defendant-Appellant.

Leocadio Joaquin, for Appellant.

Solicitor-General Araneta, for Appellee.

SYLLABUS


1. CRIMINAL LAW; ABANDONMENT OF POST. — A person who, being a member of the Insular police and being a sentinel on duty, runs away and abandons his post of duty at a time when the cuartel of said Insular. police is attacked by several armed persons, and does not return to his post of duty until after the said armed persons who attacked the said cuartel have been repulsed, is guilty of the crime provided for and punished by section 5 of Act No. 619 of the Philippine Commission.


D E C I S I O N


JOHNSON, J. :


The defendant here was charged with a violation of section 5 of Act No. 619 of the Philippine Commission. The complaint alleges that on or about the 10th day of February, 1903, at 3 o’clock a. m., in the pueblo of San Jose, Province of Nueva Ecija, the defendant being then and there a soldier of the second class of the Insular police, and being then and there a sentinel on duty on said night, ran away and shamefully abandoned his post of duty, at a time when the cuartel of said Insular police was attacked by several armed persons, and that he did not return to his post of duty until after the said armed persons who attacked the said cuartel had been repulsed.

Upon hearing the evidence the Court of First Instance of the Province of Nueva Ecija found the defendant guilty of the crime charged in this complaint, and sentenced him to be imprisoned for a period of two years and six months and to pay a fine of $1,000 and the costs.

Section 5 of Act No. 619 provides:jgc:chanrobles.com.ph

"Any member of the Constabulary who misbehaves himself before any outlaw, robber, or other enemy, runs away or shamefully abandons any post or guard, or advises or persuades others to do the like, or casts away his arms or ammunition or quits his post or command to plunder or pillage, shall be fined not exceeding three thousand dollars or imprisoned not exceeding three years, or both."cralaw virtua1aw library

The evidence adduced in the trial of said cause by two or more witnesses establishes the fact that the defendant on the night of the 10th of February, 1903, was a member of the Insular police and a soldier of the second class; that at about 3 o’clock a.m. the cuartel of the Constabulary in the pueblo of San Jose of the Province of Nueva Ecija was attacked by a band of armed men; that the defendant abandoned his post of duty as sentinel and ran away out of the said cuartel, without attempting in any manner to assist in repelling the said attack; that after running away he hid himself in an estero near the said cuartel, and that he did not return to his post of duty until two hours after the said band of armed men had been repulsed and driven away by his companions, who remained in the cuartel of said police. These facts are sufficient to justify the sentence of the Court of First Instance of the Province of Nueva Ecija, and it is therefore affirmed, with costs of both instances. So ordered.

Arellano, C.J., Torres, Mapa and Carson, JJ., concur.




Back to Home | Back to Main




















chanrobles.com





ChanRobles On-Line Bar Review

ChanRobles Internet Bar Review : www.chanroblesbar.com

ChanRobles MCLE On-line

ChanRobles Lawnet Inc. - ChanRobles MCLE On-line : www.chanroblesmcleonline.com






February-1905 Jurisprudence                 

  • G.R. No. 1657 February 1, 1905 - UNITED STATES v. SULPICIO ALIÑO ET AL.

    004 Phil 181

  • G.R. No. 1942 February 1, 1905 - UNITED STATES v. LOPE DEDICATORIA

    004 Phil 183

  • G.R. No. 1459 February 2, 1905 - UNITED STATES v. JOHN MACK

    004 Phil 185

  • G.R. No. 1678 February 2, 1905 - UNITED STATES v. BRAULIO ALMASAN

    004 Phil 186

  • G.R. No. 1961 February 2, 1905 - UNITED STATES v. ESTEBAN BAUTISTA, ET AL.

    004 Phil 188

  • G.R. No. 1865 February 3, 1905 - UNITED STATES v. GREGORIO LACANELAO SANTOS, ET AL.

    004 Phil 189

  • G.R. No. 1886 February 4, 1905 - UNITED STATES v. CANDELARIO CUISON

    004 Phil 194

  • G.R. No. 1157 February 6, 1905 - UNITED STATES v. HILARION GUZMAN

    004 Phil 196

  • G.R. No. 1940 February 6, 1905 - UNITED STATES v. NICOLAS PALILIO, ET AL.

    004 Phil 198

  • G.R. No. 1568 February 10, 1905 - UNITED STATES v. AQUILINO CALVO

    004 Phil 201

  • G.R. No. 2342 February 10, 1905 - CONCEPCION CALVO v. ANGELES O. DE GUTIERREZ, ET AL.

    004 Phil 203

  • G.R. No. 1662 February 13, 1905 - UNITED STATES v. JOSE YAMBAO

    004 Phil 204

  • G.R. No. 1686 February 13, 1905 - UNITED STATES v. PAULINO PALISOC, ET AL.

    004 Phil 207

  • G.R. No. 1731 February 13, 1905 - UNITED STATES v. DANIEL MARINAY, ET AL.

    004 Phil 209

  • G.R. No. 1990 February 13, 1905 - UNITED STATES v. SIXTO PABLO

    004 Phil 215

  • G.R. No. 1728 February 15, 1905 - UNITED STATES v. ANTONIO DALUSONG

    004 Phil 216

  • G.R. No. 1912 February 15, 1905 - UNITED STATES v. ENRIQUE CAIDO, ET AL.

    004 Phil 217

  • G.R. No. 1768 February 17, 1905 - UNITED STATES v. CATALINO GERALE, ET AL.

    004 Phil 218

  • G.R. No. 1322 February 18, 1905 - UNITED STATES v. TEODORO PINEDA

    004 Phil 223

  • G.R. No. 1787 February 21, 1905 - UNITED STATES v. LOPENA ET AL.

    004 Phil 224

  • G.R. No. 1751 February 23, 1905 - UNITED STATES v. VICENTE LOZADA

    004 Phil 226

  • G.R. No. 2063 February 24, 1905 - UNITED STATES v. TOMAS BIRUEDA

    004 Phil 229

  • G.R. No. 1663 February 28, 1905 - UNITED STATES v. FIDELES RANA, ET AL.

    004 Phil 231

  • G.R. No. 2203 February 28, 1905 - UNITED STATES v. DOMINGO SALCEDO

    004 Phil 234