Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence


Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence > Year 1905 > March 1905 Decisions > G.R. No. 1937 March 10, 1905 - UNITED STATES v. TOMAS DOON

004 Phil 249:




PHILIPPINE SUPREME COURT DECISIONS

EN BANC

[G.R. No. 1937. March 10, 1905. ]

THE UNITED STATES, Complainant-Appellee, v. TOMAS DOON, Defendant-Appellant.

Francisco Ortigas, for Appellant.

Solicitor-General Araneta, for Appellee.

SYLLABUS


1. CRIMINAL LAW; MURDER. — The fact the defendant tied his victim around the elbows so as to prevent any defense the latter might make constitutes treachery (alevosia) and makes the defendant guilty of the crime of murder.

2. ID.; ID.; MODIFYING CIRCUMSTANCES; PENALTY. — There being no aggravating or extenuating circumstances concurring in the commission of the crime, the corresponding penalty should be imposed in its medium degree.


D E C I S I O N


TORRES, J. :


In a complaint dated October 14, 1903, the provincial fiscal of Bulacan charged Tomas Doon with the crime of murder. The complaint stated that the defendant, on or about the month of April, 1902, with known premeditation, did follow one Ramon Gotica into a field in the barrio of Caruhatan, town of Polo, armed with a revolver and a bolo and accompanied by an unknown person; that when he overtook said Gotica he tied him around the elbows and conducted him to Sapangmalalim in said barrio; that when he arrived there the defendant took the victim by the hair and cut his throat with a bolo, the said Gotica dying instantly; all contrary to law.

The case having been tried, the court below found the defendant guilty of the crime of murder and sentenced him to cadena perpetua with the accessories and to pay the sum of 1,000 pesos to the heirs of the deceased, and the costs. From this judgment the defendant appealed.

It appears from the evidence adduced in the case that some days previous to the occurrence the defendant was heard to say that he would kill said Ramon Gotica, but those who heard him did not pay any attention to his statement, although it was public in the barrio that Tomas Doon lived illicitly with Gotica’s wife; that between 8 and 9 o’clock on the morning of a day, the date of which being unknown, the defendant was seen pursuing the deceased through the fields; that at that time the defendant was armed with a bolo and carried some twine; that two of the residents of the barrio, Jose Doroña and Apolonio Padrinao, on seeing him come from his house, came out of their homes and went toward the woods between the barrios of Caruhatan and Pugad Babuy; that when the defendant reached the deceased, Gotica, he tied him around the elbows and, taking him by the hair with one hand, struck him with a bolo in the neck; that the deceased died instantly, and that the defendant was accompanied by an unknown person.

All this was witnessed by the two neighbors aforesaid, who from different points went after the defendant and concealed themselves behind some bushes and saw the occurrence; that the place where the murder was committed was between the barrios of Caruhatan and Pugad Babuy, near Sapangmalalim, and about 300 yards from the house of the witness Doroña; that between 9 and 10 o’clock on the evening of the same day the defendant, Tomas Doon, accompanied by four other unknown persons, called on the witness Apolonio Padrinao and commanded him to follow them under pain of instant death; that Apolonio Padrinao did as he was told and went with the defendant and his companions to the place called Sapangmalalim; that when he arrived there the defendant told him to take the corpse of Gotica, assisted by the other companions of defendant, to a small creek near there, and by order of the defendant he covered the body with some leaves; that when he returned to his house from that place the defendant and his companions warned him, under threats of death, not to tell anything to anybody; that the defendant was in the habit of going to the house of the deceased, and that after the latter was killed defendant went to live in the house with the wife of the deceased, Paula; that the defendant used to say he was a captain under Contreras, a chief of the Katipunan, and for this reason the inhabitants of the barrio feared him; they did not report the occurrence to anybody because the defendant was armed as a captain under Contreras, and because the latter’s band used to invade the pueblos, the residents were afraid and very few remained in the barrio.

It appears, then, from the foregoing statements that it is a fact fully proven in the present case that Ramon Gotica was killed violently; that his killing was accompanied by the aggravating circumstance of treachery (alevosia), because the defendant, in order to insure the execution of the crime without any risk to himself which might arise from whatever defense the victim might make, tied him around the elbows, and while in this position he struck him with the bolo in the neck, from which blow the deceased died. These facts constitute the crime of murder provided for and punished by article 403 of the Penal Code.

The liability of the defendant, Tomas Doon, as principal in the commission of the said crime can not be denied, notwithstanding the fact that he pleaded not guilty. The evidence introduced by the defense has not succeeded in overcoming the evidence of the prosecution. Further, the defendant has not succeeded in providing the truth of his allegations, nor that the witnesses for the prosecution testified falsely. The testimony of the widow of the deceased, far from showing the nonexistence of the crime, corroborates the unexplained disappearance of her husband. In the crime there are no aggravating or extenuating circumstances to be considered.

The circumstance of premeditation can not be taken into account, because it has not been established that the defendant premeditated or had a deliberate intention to deprive the deceased of his life, and therefore the penalty incurred by defendant must be imposed in its medium degree.

By virtue of the reasons above stated we are of the opinion that the judgment below should be affirmed, with the costs in this instance, it being understood that Tomas Doon is also sentenced to the accessory penalties provided for in paragraphs 2 and 3 of article 54 of the Penal Code.

This case to be remanded to the court below with a certified copy of this decision and of the judgment to be rendered in accordance herewith. So ordered.

Arellano, C.J., Mapa, Johnson and Carson, JJ., concur.




Back to Home | Back to Main




















chanrobles.com





ChanRobles On-Line Bar Review

ChanRobles Internet Bar Review : www.chanroblesbar.com

ChanRobles MCLE On-line

ChanRobles Lawnet Inc. - ChanRobles MCLE On-line : www.chanroblesmcleonline.com






March-1905 Jurisprudence                 

  • G.R. No. 1193 March 4, 1905 - UNITED STATES v. JOSEPH HOWARD

    004 Phil 238

  • G.R. No. 1996 March 6, 1905 - UNITED STATES v. ESPIRIDION ROQUE ET AL.

    004 Phil 242

  • G.R. No. 1420 March 10, 1905 - UNITED STATES v. BENITO CASTROVERDE

    004 Phil 246

  • G.R. No. 1937 March 10, 1905 - UNITED STATES v. TOMAS DOON

    004 Phil 249

  • G.R. No. 1611 March 13, 1905 - UNITED STATES v. MODESTO CABAYA, ET AL.

    004 Phil 252

  • G.R. No. 1677 March 13, 1905 - UNITED STATES v. ALEJO CARANTO, ET AL.

    004 Phil 256

  • G.R. No. 1685 March 13, 1905 - UNITED STATES v. PABLO CORPUS

    004 Phil 258

  • G.R. No. 1758 March 13, 1905 - UNITED STATES v. MACARIO CATIGBAC

    004 Phil 259

  • G.R. No. 1931 March 13, 1905 - UNITED STATES v. JOSE CARIASO, ET AL.

    004 Phil 261

  • G.R. No. 1944 March 13, 1905 - UNITED STATES v. JOSE BUCOY, ET AL.

    004 Phil 263

  • G.R. No. 1986 March 13, 1905 - UNITED STATES v. JUAN GATMAITAN

    004 Phil 265

  • G.R. No. 2413 March 13, 1905 - EUSTAQUIA SALCEDO, ET AL. v. AMANDA DE MARCAIDA DE FARIAS

    004 Phil 267

  • G.R. No. 892 March 14, 1905 - UNITED STATES v. JUAN LUNA

    004 Phil 269

  • G.R. No. 1503 March 14, 1905 - UNITED STATES v. ALEJO RAVIDAD, ET AL.

    004 Phil 271

  • G.R. No. 1716 March 14, 1905 - UNITED STATES v. ISAIAS AGUASA ET AL.

    004 Phil 274

  • G.R. No. 1902 March 14, 1905 - UNITED STATES v. LUDOVICO ISAIS, ET AL.

    004 Phil 276

  • G.R. No. 1502 March 16, 1905 - UNITED STATES v. BENJAMIN M. GOODWIN, ET AL.

    004 Phil 282

  • G.R. No. 1770 March 16, 1905 - TOMASA FIDELINO v. BENITO LEGARDA

    004 Phil 285

  • G.R. No. 1941 March 16, 1905 - UNITED STATES v. TIBURCIO LAZARO

    004 Phil 288

  • G.R. No. 1459 March 17, 1905 - UNITED STATES v. JOHN MACK

    004 Phil 291

  • G.R. No. 1605 March 17, 1905 - UNITED STATES v. SIMEON MANAYAO, ET AL.

    004 Phil 293

  • G.R. No. 2012 March 17, 1905 - UNITED STATES v. ENGRACIO ANGEL

    004 Phil 295

  • G.R. No. 452 March 18, 1905 - IN RE: JOSE ROBLES LAHESA

    004 Phil 298

  • G.R. No. 1901 March 18, 1905 - UNITED STATES v. JOHN M. FLEMISTER

    004 Phil 300

  • G.R. No. 1593 March 20, 1905 - UNITED STATES v. BENITO MERCADO

    004 Phil 304

  • G.R. No. 1803 March 20, 1905 - UNITED STATES v. HERRMAN

    004 Phil 306

  • G.R. No. 1804 March 20, 1905 - UNITED STATES v. GEORGE HERRMAN

    004 Phil 307

  • G.R. No. 1654 March 21, 1905 - UNITED STATES v. FELIX MABIRAL, ET AL.

    004 Phil 308

  • G.R. No. 1749 March 21, 1905 - UNITED STATES v. FORTUNATO ODICTA

    004 Phil 309

  • G.R. No. 1821 March 21, 1905 - UNITED STATES v. PEDRO ORTEGA

    004 Phil 314

  • G.R. No. 2104 March 23, 1905 - EDWARD B. MERCHANT v. SIMPLICIO DEL ROSARIO

    004 Phil 316

  • G.R. No. 1461 March 24, 1905 - UNITED STATES v. WILLIAM A. WILSON

    004 Phil 317

  • G.R. No. 2270 March 24, 1905 - UNITED STATES v. JOSE T. DIAZ

    004 Phil 325

  • G.R. No. 1741 March 25, 1905 - UNITED STATES v. CEFERINO IBRADO, ET AL.

    004 Phil 330

  • G.R. No. 1214 March 27, 1905 - UNITED STATES v. RAMON MELENCIO

    004 Phil 331

  • G.R. No. 1580 March 27, 1905 - UNITED STATES v. PAULINO VALLADOS

    004 Phil 339

  • G.R. No. 1740 March 27, 1905 - UNITED STATES v. JULIO GLORIA

    004 Phil 341

  • G.R. No. 1987 March 27, 1905 - UNITED STATES v. APOLONIO MANAUL

    004 Phil 342

  • G.R. No. 1332 March 29, 1905 - UNITED STATES v. GERONIMO LUZON

    004 Phil 343

  • G.R. No. 1352 March 29, 1905 - UNITED STATES v. APOLONIO CABALLEROS

    004 Phil 350

  • G.R. No. 1721 March 29, 1905 - UNITED STATES v. CHARLES H. OSBORN

    004 Phil 352

  • G.R. No. 1726 March 29, 1905 - UNITED STATES v. PRUDENCIO SORNITO

    004 Phil 357

  • G.R. No. 1959 March 29, 1905 - UNITED STATES v. FELIX AGUILAR

    004 Phil 361

  • G.R. No. 1967 March 29, 1905 - UNITED STATES v. FRANCISCO ALBAN

    004 Phil 363