Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence


Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence > Year 1905 > October 1905 Decisions > G.R. No. 2054 October 14, 1905 - UNITED STATES v. MATIAS BUNAGAN

005 Phil 141:




PHILIPPINE SUPREME COURT DECISIONS

EN BANC

[G.R. No. 2054. October 14, 1905. ]

THE UNITED STATES, Complainant-Appellee, v. MATIAS BUNAGAN, Defendant-Appellant.

F.C. Fisher, for Appellant.

Solicitor-General Araneta, for Appellee.

SYLLABUS


1. FALSIFICATION OF A PUBLIC DOCUMENT; CRIMINAL PENALTIES. — The provisions of the Penal Code which defines and penalizes an offense must be strictly adhered to in the imposition of penalties.


D E C I S I O N


CARSON, J. :


The charge contained in the information filed in this case is as follows:jgc:chanrobles.com.ph

"That on or about the month of November, 1903, in the town of Enrile, Province of Cagayan, the said Matias Bunagan, while a municipal treasurer, duly appointed and qualified for the above town, in abuse of his office, made false entries in the account books of the municipality of Enrile and in voucher No. 4 of November 30, 1903, purporting to be salaries paid for the months of September, October, and November last, in favor of the following members of the municipal police force of Enrile: Marcos Cepeda, Raymundo Luna, Fermin Mabborang, Esteban Gutierrez, Pedro Carmayo, Catalino Gumabay, Fortunato Taguinod, Benigno Defeo, Bartolome Pasicolan, Vicente Bunagan, and Jose Gammad, whereas he had not made such payments, in violation of the law."cralaw virtua1aw library

The accused was found guilty of the offense charged and sentenced to twelve years and one day imprisonment (cadena temporal).

We find no error in the proceedings prejudicial to the rights of the accused, and the evidence adduced at the trial fully sustains the findings of the trial court.

The sentence imposed did not include a fine of from 1,250 pesetas to 12,500 pesetas, as required by the provisions of article 300 of the Penal Code, which defines and penalizes the crime of falsification of public documents, and the accessory penalties prescribed by law were not expressly imposed as required by the provisions of article 90 of that code. We therefore modify the sentence of the trial court by imposing upon the accused in addition thereto a fine of 2,000 pesetas and the accessory penalties prescribed in article 56 of the Penal Code.

Thus modified the judgment and sentence appealed from are affirmed, with the costs of this instance against the Appellant. So ordered.

Arellano, C.J., Torres, Mapa, and Johnson, JJ., concur.

Willard, J., did not sit in this case.




Back to Home | Back to Main


chanrobles.com



ChanRobles Professional Review, Inc.

ChanRobles Professional Review, Inc. : www.chanroblesprofessionalreview.com
ChanRobles On-Line Bar Review

ChanRobles Internet Bar Review : www.chanroblesbar.com
ChanRobles CPA Review Online

ChanRobles CPALE Review Online : www.chanroblescpareviewonline.com
ChanRobles Special Lecture Series

ChanRobles Special Lecture Series - Memory Man : www.chanroblesbar.com/memoryman





October-1905 Jurisprudence                 

  • G.R. No. 2123 October 3, 1905 - VICENTA NERY LIM-CHINGCO v. CRISANTA TERARIRAY, ET AL.

    005 Phil 120

  • G.R. No. 2124 October 7, 1905 - SIMEON DU-YUNGCO v. MACARIO BARRERA

    005 Phil 125

  • G.R. No. 2137 October 9, 1905 - UNITED STATES v. DOMINGO BALUYUT

    005 Phil 129

  • G.R. No. 1273 October 10, 1905 - UNITED STATES v. BENITO VARGAS, ET AL.

    005 Phil 136

  • G.R. No. 1700 October 12, 1905 - MIGUEL PICCIO ARANETA v. JOSE GARRIDO

    005 Phil 137

  • G.R. No. 1962 October 12, 1905 - JOSE PINEDA, ET AL. v. GABINO GASATAYA

    005 Phil 139

  • G.R. No. 2054 October 14, 1905 - UNITED STATES v. MATIAS BUNAGAN

    005 Phil 141

  • G.R. No. 2091 October 18, 1905 - COMPAÑIA GENERAL DE TABACOS v. SEBASTIAN VICTOR MOLINA, ET AL.

    005 Phil 142

  • G.R. No. 2238 October 19, 1905 - LEONCIA LIUANAG v. YU-SON-QUIAN

    005 Phil 147

  • G.R. No. 2284 October 20, 1905 - UNITED STATES v. JOSE PARAISO

    005 Phil 149

  • G.R. No. 2631 November 18, 1905 - EDWIN H. WARNER v. 771 OBJECTORS

    005 Phil 153

  • G.R. No. 2631 October 21, 1905 - EDWIN H. WARNER v. 771 OBJECTORS

    005 Phil 330

  • G.R. No. 1847 October 23, 1905 - VIDAL CAUSIN v. DIONISIO JAKOSALEM

    005 Phil 155

  • G.R. No. 2536 October 23, 1905 - SILVINA LEGASPI v. JOHN C. SWEENEY

    005 Phil 157

  • G.R. No. 1442 October 24, 1905 - JOSE REGALADO v. MARIA GONZAGA, ET AL.

    005 Phil 159

  • G.R. No. 1750 October 26, 1905 - GUILLERMO BAXTER, ET AL. v. ZOSIMO ZUAZUA, ET AL.

    005 Phil 160

  • G.R. No. 1923 October 26, 1905 - IGNACIO DE ICAZA, ET AL. v. MATEO O. PEREZ

    005 Phil 166

  • G.R. No. 2346 October 26, 1905 - ALBINO SANTOS, ET AL. v. SIMPLICIO DEL ROSARIO

    005 Phil 171

  • G.R. No. 1403 October 27, 1905 - JOSE E. ALEMANY, ET AL. v. JUANA MORENO

    005 Phil 172

  • G.R. No. 2599 October 27, 1905 - CARMEN P. LINART v. MARIA JUANA I. UGARTE

    005 Phil 176

  • G.R. No. 2651 October 27, 1905 - MACARIO CASTRO v. CARMEN CASTRO

    005 Phil 180

  • G.R. No. 1595 October 28, 1905 - CARMEN AYALA DE ROXAS v. JUANA VALENCIA

    005 Phil 182

  • G.R. No. 2353 October 28, 1905 - ZOILO GARCIA VASQUEZ v. P.B. FLORENCE

    005 Phil 183

  • G.R. No. 2945 October 28, 1905 - B.H. MACKE, ET AL. v. JOSE CAMPS

    005 Phil 185