Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence


Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence > Year 1906 > December 1906 Decisions > G.R. No. L-2766 December 12, 1906 - UNITED STATES v. PAULO CABAMNGAN

007 Phil 191:




PHILIPPINE SUPREME COURT DECISIONS

FIRST DIVISION

[G.R. No. L-2766. December 12, 1906. ]

THE UNITED STATES, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. PAULO CABAMNGAN, ET AL., Defendants-Appellants.

Hipolito Magsalin, for Appellants.

Solicitor-General Araneta, for Appellee.

SYLLABUS


1. WITNESSES; CREDIBILITY. — Defendants in criminal cases should not be convicted upon unsupported testimony of witnesses whose testimony is or has been discredited.

2. ROBBERY; DWELLING; FALSE KEYS. — One who commits robbery by means of keys obtained from inhabitants of the house robbed can not be punished for the crime of robbery under paragraph 4 of article 508 of the Penal Code, but should be punished in accordance with the provisions of paragraph 5 of article 503 in relation with article 504 of the same code.

3. ID. — When the robbery is committed at night the aggravating circumstance of nocturnity should be considered in imposing the penalty.


D E C I S I O N


JOHNSON, J. :


These defendants were charged with the crime of robo en cuadrilla in the Court of First Instance of Ilocos Norte.

The evidence adduced during the trials shows that on the night of the 4th of May, 1904, a band of persons, numbering about forty, more or less, armed with gun, revolvers, bolos, and clubs, entered the convent in the pueblo of Piddig of the Province of Ilocos Norte, and took and carried away from said convent by force, money, clothing, and jewelry amounting to P3,000, more or less. The said defendants were thereafter arrested and placed upon trial at Laoag, the capital of the said province, on the 11th of January, 1905.

After hearing the evidence adduced during the trial of said cause the court found that the evidence was insufficient to support the charges against Nemesio Nabanglit, Valeriano Manuel, Candido Domingo, and Nemesio Domingo, and therefore dismissed them from the custody of the law.

The court, after considering the evidence, found that Paulo Cabamngan, Cecilio Lazo, Valeriano Baoit, and Quintin Quinduyos were guilty of the crime of robo en cuadrilla, in that they did, on the night of the 4th of May, 1904, together with others unknown, armed with a gun, revolvers, bolos, and clubs, enter the convent, an inhabited house in the pueblo of Piddig, and by means of false keys did, by force, take and carry away certain money, clothing, and jewelry amounting in value about P3,000, more or less.

During that trial of the cause in the court below the prosecuting attorney presented one Severino Lagat as a witness, who testified that he was a member of the said band and entered the said convent on the night in question. This witness identified Paulo Cabamngan, Cecilio Lazo, Valeriano Baoit, and Quintin Quinduyos as persons who were also members of the said band who entered the said convent and assisted in the said robbery.

Other witnesses were called during the said trial, among whom was Martin Nicolas, who was a muchacho in the said convent on the night of the robbery. He was able to identify the accused Valeriano Baoit as one of the band who entered said convent on the night in question. None of the other witnesses confirmed the statement of Severo Lagat.

Other members of this alleged band were arrested and tried in separate causes (Nos. 2767, 1 2768, 2 and 2769 3). This same Severo Lagat appeared as a witness in some of those other causes. In cause No. 2769, United States. v. Fabian Vallesteros, in which the defendant was charged with being a member of this same band, this court held in deciding that case that the unsupported testimony of Severo Lagat was insufficient upon which to base a judgment of the accused, Valeriano Baoit; therefore the evidence in this case is insufficient to support the charges against the other defendants, Paulo Cabamngan, Cecilio Lopez, and Quintin Quinduyos. The cause is therefore dismissed as to them.

We further find that the testimony is sufficient to support the charges against Valeriano Baoit, and we therefore find him guilty of the crime of robo en cuadrilla.

The lower court sentenced Valeriano Baoit to be imprisoned for a period of fourteen years and eight months of cadena temporal. This degree of punishment was the crime of robbery with intimidation to the persons in an inhabited house and by making use of false keys. An examination of the evidence shows that the defendant, together with an armed band composed of more than three persons, by force and intimidation, committed robbery in clothing, and jewelry amounting to P3,000, more or less. The evidence does not show, however, that the defendant and his companions used false keys in effecting the robbery; in the house. Therefore the penalty provided in paragraph 3 of article 508 of the Penal Code is not applicable to this case. (Decision of the Supreme Court of Spain, 26th of December, 1807; decision of the supreme court of Spain 11th of June, 1872; Viada, vol. 2, p. 369.)

Under the evidence the defendant should be punished in accordance with the provisions of paragraph 5 of article 503 in relation with article 504 of the Penal Code. The penalty provided for in this paragraph is eight years eleven months and ten days to ten years of presidio mayor. The crime was committed in the nighttime. The defendants evidently took advantage of that time in order that they might the more effectually carry out their criminal purposes Nocturnity should therefore be considered as an aggravating circumstance. There were not mitigating circumstances. The defendant must therefore be punished in the maximum degree of presidio mayor, which is ten years.

It is the judgment of this court the sentence of the lower court be modified and that the defendant be sentenced to be imprisoned for a period of ten years of presidio mayor and to pay the costs.

After the expiration of ten days let judgment be entered in accordance herewith and ten days thereafter the cause be remanded to the lower court for proper procedure. So ordered.

Arellano, C.J., Torres, Mapa, Carson, Willard and Tracey, JJ., concur.

Endnotes:



1. 6 Phil. Rep., 411.

2. 6 Phil. Rep., 401.

3. Not reported.




Back to Home | Back to Main




















chanrobles.com





ChanRobles On-Line Bar Review

ChanRobles Internet Bar Review : www.chanroblesbar.com

ChanRobles MCLE On-line

ChanRobles Lawnet Inc. - ChanRobles MCLE On-line : www.chanroblesmcleonline.com






December-1906 Jurisprudence                 

  • G.R. No. L-2242 December 1, 1906 - HOUSTON B. PAROT v. CARLOS GEMORA

    007 Phil 94

  • G.R. No. L-2530 December 3, 1906 - ORDER OF DOMINICANS v. INSULAR GOVERNMENT

    007 Phil 98

  • G.R. No. L-2718 December 4, 1906 - JOSE EMETERIO GUEVARA v. HIPOLITO DE OCAMPO

    007 Phil 104

  • G.R. No. 2800 December 4, 1906 - FRANK S. BOURNS v. D.M. CARMAN ET AL.

    007 Phil 117

  • G.R. No. L-2923 December 4, 1906 - UNITED STATES v. PEDRO PALMADRES

    007 Phil 120

  • G.R. No. L-3009 December 4, 1906 - FELICIDAD BUSTAMANTE v. CRISTOBAL BUSTAMANTE

    007 Phil 125

  • G.R. No. L-3534 December 4, 1906 - TO GUIOC-CO v. LORENZO DEL ROSARIO

    007 Phil 126

  • G.R. No. L-2671 December 5, 1906 - UNITED STATES v. VICTORIANO POBLETE

    007 Phil 127

  • G.R. No. L-2704 December 6, 1906 - UNITED STATES v. FEDERICO ORTIZ, ET AL.

    008 Phil 752

  • G.R. No. L-1952 December 6, 1906 - CARLOS GSELL v. VALERIANO VELOSO YAP-JUE

    007 Phil 130

  • G.R. No. L-2746 December 6, 1906 - MATEO CARIÑO v. TINSULAR GOVERNMENT

    007 Phil 132

  • G.R. No. L-2921 December 6, 1906 - LUCAS GONZALEZ v. ROSENDO DEL ROSARIO

    007 Phil 140

  • G.R. No. L-3022 December 6, 1906 - UNITED STATES v. SEBASTIAN LOZANO

    007 Phil 142

  • G.R. No. L-3429 December 6, 1906 - CASTLE BROS. v. GO-JUNO

    007 Phil 144

  • G.R. Nos. L-2472 & 2473 December 7, 1906 - UNITED STATES v. TOMAS CORTES

    007 Phil 149

  • G.R. No. L-2803 December 7, 1906 - DAMASA ALCALA v. FRANCISCO SALGADO

    007 Phil 151

  • G.R. No. L-2890 December 7, 1906 - VALENTINA PALMA v. JORGE FERNANDEZ, ET AL.

    007 Phil 154

  • G.R. No. L-2929 December 7, 1906 - FAUSTA BATARRA v. FRANCISCO MARCOS

    007 Phil 156

  • G.R. No. L-3006 December 7, 1906 - JOSE GONZALEZ v. AGUSTIN BAÑES

    007 Phil 158

  • G.R. No. L-3062 December 7, 1906 - MARIA MAGALLANES v. TEODORA CAÑETA

    007 Phil 161

  • G.R. No. L-3078 December 7, 1906 - FERNANDO PEREZ v. JUAN GARCIA BOSQUE

    007 Phil 162

  • G.R. No. L-3495 December 7, 1906 - JAMES J. RAFFERTY v. JUDGE OF THE CFI FOR THE PROV. OF CEBU, ET AL.

    007 Phil 164

  • G.R. No. L-2777 December 10, 1906 - MARIA CASAL v. EMILIO MORETA

    007 Phil 169

  • G.R. No. L-2532 December 11, 1906 - IN RE MACARIO ADRIOATICO

    007 Phil 173

  • G.R. No. L-2787 December 11, 1906 - CELSO DAYRIT v. GIL GONZALEZ

    007 Phil 182

  • G.R. No. L-3010 December 11, 1906 - JULIAN TUBUCON v. PETRONA DALISAY

    007 Phil 183

  • G.R. No. L-3050 December 11, 1906 - LUIS SANTOS v. SILVESTRE DILAG

    007 Phil 185

  • G.R. No. L-3117 December 11, 1906 - UNITED STATES v. MACARIO ADRIATICO

    007 Phil 187

  • G.R. No. L-2766 December 12, 1906 - UNITED STATES v. PAULO CABAMNGAN

    007 Phil 191

  • G.R. No. L-3094 December 12, 1906 - FRED SPARREVOHN v. EMIL M. BACHRACH

    007 Phil 194

  • G.R. No. L-2828 December 14, 1906 - UNITED STATES v. JUAN SOLIS

    007 Phil 195

  • G.R. No. L-3204 December 17, 1906 - UNITED STATES v. FLAVIANO SALANATIN

    007 Phil 199

  • G.R. No. L-2855 December 19, 1906 - FLEMING, ET AL. v. LORCHA "NUESTRA SRA. DEL CARMEN

    007 Phil 200

  • G.R. No. L-2757 December 20, 1906 - UNITED STATES v. CHAN LIM ALAN

    007 Phil 203

  • G.R. No. L-2908 December 20, 1906 - ANTONIO TORRES Y ROXAS, ET AL. v. RAMON B. GENATO (Intervenor)

    007 Phil 204

  • G.R. No. L-3119 December 20, 1906 - UNITED STATES v. ESTANISLAO CAGAOAAN

    007 Phil 207

  • G.R. No. L-3093 December 22, 1906 - UNITED STATES v. REGINO MANABAT

    007 Phil 209

  • G.R. No. L-2541 December 26, 1906 - IGNACIO ICAZA v. RICARDO FLORES

    007 Phil 211

  • G.R. No. L-1999 December 27, 1906 - UNITED STATES v. VICENTE MANUEL

    007 Phil 221

  • G.R. No. L-2765 December 27, 1906 - JOSE DOLIENDO v. DOMINGO BIARNESA

    007 Phil 232

  • G.R. No. L-3249 December 28, 1906 - UNITED STATES v. JOSE FLOR MATA

    007 Phil 235

  • G.R. No. L-2395 December 29, 1906 - DOROTEO CORTES v. DY-JIA AND DY-CHUANDING

    007 Phil 238

  • G.R. No. L-2825 December 29, 1906 - UNITED STATES v. PAUL A. WEEMS

    007 Phil 241

  • G.R. No. L-2916 December 29, 1906 - UNITED STATES v. VICENTE OROSA

    007 Phil 247

  • G.R. No. L-2966 December 29, 1906 - NICOLAS CONCEPCION TAN TACO v. VICENTE GAY

    007 Phil 252

  • G.R. No. L-3120 December 29, 1906 - BRYAN v. AMERICAN BANK

    007 Phil 255

  • G.R. No. L-3466 December 29, 1906 - MEYER HERMAN v. A. S. CROSSFIELD

    007 Phil 259