October 1907 - Philippine Supreme Court Decisions/Resolutions
Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence
Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence > Year 1907 > October 1907 Decisions >
G.R. No. L-3729 October 4, 1907 - UNITED STATES v. ZACARIAS VALENCIA
008 Phil 729:
008 Phil 729:
FIRST DIVISION
[G.R. No. L-3729. October 4, 1907. ]
THE UNITED STATES, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. ZACARIAS VALENCIA, Defendant-Appellant.
Juan M. Paterno, for Appellant.
Attorney-General Araneta, for Appellee.
SYLLABUS
MISAPPROPRIATION. — A public officer who, upon an official examination of another office, furnishes public funds for the purpose of deception by covering up a deficit in the accounts, is guilty of the offense defined and punished by paragraph 3 of article 392 of the Penal Code.
D E C I S I O N
WILLARD, J. :
At the trial in the court below the parties agreed upon the following facts:jgc:chanrobles.com.ph
"That the municipal treasurer of Hagonoy, Mr. Eusebio Reyes, on the 25th day of August of this year, between 8 and 9 o’clock a.m., called the municipal treasurer of Paombong, Mr. Zacarias Valencia, by telephone, requesting him to send him the amount agreed upon;
"That the municipal treasurer of Paombong, Mr. Zacarias Valencia, between 11 and 12 o’clock of the same day, 25th of August, sent the sum of 800 pesos, Philippine currency, by messenger, to the municipal treasurer of Hagonoy, Mr. Eusebio Reyes, whose funds were then being counted; that after the counting of the funds of the municipal treasurer of Hagonoy, the latter returned the money — that is to say, the sum of 800 Philippine pesos, in paper money — to the municipal treasurer of Paombong; and
"That the funds of the municipal treasurer of Paombong, on being counted during the month of August of this year, did not show any deficit at the first counting, and that only a small deficit of about 3 pesos was found at the second examination."cralaw virtua1aw library
In addition to these facts it was proved that the messenger of the defendant who carried the money to Hagonoy waited for it and brought it back about 3 or 4 o’clock in the afternoon of the same said; that the treasurer of Hagonoy used the money to cover a deficit which existed in his accounts, and that when his accounts were examined again two or three days later there was found a shortage therein of about 900 pesos.
The only question in the case is, Whether the money which the defendant sent to Hagonoy came from the municipal treasury or from his private funds? The testimony of his witnesses as to the way in which the 800 pesos was procured can not be believed.
The facts show the commission of the crime defined and punished in article 392, paragraph 3, of the Penal Code, and the judgment imposing a fine of 50 pesos upon the defendant and providing for his suspension from office for two years and one day is hereby affirmed, with the costs of this instance against the Appellant. So ordered.
Arellano, C.J., Torres, Johnson, and Tracey, JJ., concur.
"That the municipal treasurer of Hagonoy, Mr. Eusebio Reyes, on the 25th day of August of this year, between 8 and 9 o’clock a.m., called the municipal treasurer of Paombong, Mr. Zacarias Valencia, by telephone, requesting him to send him the amount agreed upon;
"That the municipal treasurer of Paombong, Mr. Zacarias Valencia, between 11 and 12 o’clock of the same day, 25th of August, sent the sum of 800 pesos, Philippine currency, by messenger, to the municipal treasurer of Hagonoy, Mr. Eusebio Reyes, whose funds were then being counted; that after the counting of the funds of the municipal treasurer of Hagonoy, the latter returned the money — that is to say, the sum of 800 Philippine pesos, in paper money — to the municipal treasurer of Paombong; and
"That the funds of the municipal treasurer of Paombong, on being counted during the month of August of this year, did not show any deficit at the first counting, and that only a small deficit of about 3 pesos was found at the second examination."cralaw virtua1aw library
In addition to these facts it was proved that the messenger of the defendant who carried the money to Hagonoy waited for it and brought it back about 3 or 4 o’clock in the afternoon of the same said; that the treasurer of Hagonoy used the money to cover a deficit which existed in his accounts, and that when his accounts were examined again two or three days later there was found a shortage therein of about 900 pesos.
The only question in the case is, Whether the money which the defendant sent to Hagonoy came from the municipal treasury or from his private funds? The testimony of his witnesses as to the way in which the 800 pesos was procured can not be believed.
The facts show the commission of the crime defined and punished in article 392, paragraph 3, of the Penal Code, and the judgment imposing a fine of 50 pesos upon the defendant and providing for his suspension from office for two years and one day is hereby affirmed, with the costs of this instance against the Appellant. So ordered.
Arellano, C.J., Torres, Johnson, and Tracey, JJ., concur.
