Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence


Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence > Year 1909 > October 1909 Decisions > G.R. No. 5423 October 9, 1909 - UNITED STATES v. SERAPIO POQUIS, ET AL.

014 Phil 261:




PHILIPPINE SUPREME COURT DECISIONS

SECOND DIVISION

[G.R. No. 5423. October 9, 1909. ]

THE UNITED STATES, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. SERAPIO POQUIS, ET AL., Defendants-Appellants.

Felipe Agoncillo for Appellants.

Attorney-General Villamor for Appellee.

SYLLABUS


1. ABDUCTION; SUBSEQUENT MARRIAGE OF ACCUSED TO OFFENDED PARTY. — The defendants were charged with the crime of abduction by forcibly taking and carrying away from her home a young girl. E., against her will and for immoral purposes. They were all convicted except the defendant R., who was absolved by reason of his subsequent marriage to the victim of the abduction. E. : Held, That such marriage, under section 2 of Act No. 1773, is a bar to the prosecution of the other defendants for the crime charged and described in the information.


D E C I S I O N


MORELAND, J. :


The defendants were charged with the crime of abduction in that on or about the night of the 13th of January, 1909, in the municipality of Cuyapo, Province of Nueva Ecija, the said defendants took from the house of Felisardo de Vera, Felisa Evangelista, a young girl, 15 years of age against her will and for immoral purposes.

The trial court found fully proved the following facts:chanrob1es virtual 1aw library

On or about the 13th day of January, 1909. Felisa Evangelista, Eulalia Alvarez, Felisardo de Vera, and Jacinta to. On the night in question the defendants herein approached the said house and by means of force and intimidation entered the same. They were all armed with bolos and clubs. Francisco Roque, Serapio Poquis and Irineo Asuncion went into the house, while the others remained outside watching the door. The three who entered the house lit the lamp, bound Felisardo de Vera, carried him outside of the house, and, returning to the house, took therefrom the women above named, handling them roughly and beating them with their bolos. Francisco Roque took with him the young girl Felisa Evangelista, carried her to a neighboring district, somewhat sparsely settled, and there lived with her for several months, they cohabiting together as man and wife — all against the will and protests of the said Felisa Evangelista.

The court found all of the defendants guilty except Francisco Roque, to whom he gave his liberty in view of the fact that he and Felisa Evangelista were married subsequent to the commission of the crime. Upon the others the court imposed the penalty of seventeen years four months and one day of reclusion temporal and the corresponding accessories of the law, and to indemnify jointly and severally the said Felisa Evangelista in the sum of P500, and each to pay one-fifth of the costs. From this decision all of the defendants except Francisco Roque appealed to this court. the only defense presented by the appellants is that they did not take Felisa Evangelista by force but that she went of her own accord.

Although the point was not raised by the defendants, we have found it incumbent upon us to consider the effect upon the other defendants of the marriage of the offended person with Francisco Roque, and, after careful consideration, we have reached the conclusion that such marriage, under the language of section 2 of Act No. 1773, is a bar to the prosecution of the other defendants for the crime charged and described in the complaint.

The judgment of the lower court is, therefore, reversed, with costs de oficio, the defendants acquitted of the crime charged, and their discharged from custody is ordered forth-with. Let judgment be entered in accordance herewith, and the case returned to the court whence it came for execution. So ordered.

Torres, Johnson, Carson and Elliott, JJ., concur.




Back to Home | Back to Main


chanrobles.com



ChanRobles Professional Review, Inc.

ChanRobles Professional Review, Inc. : www.chanroblesprofessionalreview.com
ChanRobles On-Line Bar Review

ChanRobles Internet Bar Review : www.chanroblesbar.com
ChanRobles CPA Review Online

ChanRobles CPALE Review Online : www.chanroblescpareviewonline.com
ChanRobles Special Lecture Series

ChanRobles Special Lecture Series - Memory Man : www.chanroblesbar.com/memoryman





October-1909 Jurisprudence                 

  • G.R. No. 4526 October 4, 1909 - TOMAS FORTUNA v. RUFINO VILORIA, ET AL.

    014 Phil 232

  • G.R. No. 4602 October 4, 1909 - JUAN CO v. JAMES J. RAFFERTY

    014 Phil 235

  • G.R. No. 5332 October 4, 1909 - UNITED STATES v. TEODORO BAGUIO, ET AL.

    014 Phil 240

  • G.R. No. 4663 October 9, 1909 - UNITED STATES v. PEDRO CABOLA ET AL.

    016 Phil 657

  • G.R. No. 4846 October 9, 1909 - UNITED STATES v. VICENTE MAQUIRAYA, ET AL.

    014 Phil 243

  • G.R. No. 4970 October 9, 1909 - UNITED STATES v. SERAPIO ARTICHO, ET AL.

    014 Phil 248

  • G.R. No. 5138 October 9, 1909 - JOSE MCMICKING v. DOMINGO TREMOYA, ET AL.

    014 Phil 252

  • G.R. No. 5423 October 9, 1909 - UNITED STATES v. SERAPIO POQUIS, ET AL.

    014 Phil 261

  • G.R. No. 4009 October 11, 1909 - NICOLASA ARINGO v. URBANA ARENA

    014 Phil 263

  • G.R. No. 4339 October 11, 1909 - UNITED STATES v. PONCIANO TREYES, ET AL.

    014 Phil 270

  • G.R. No. 3865 October 16, 1909 - GREGORIO FERNANDEZ v. MLA. ELECTRIC RAILROAD AND LIGHT CO.

    014 Phil 274

  • G.R. No. 4362 October 19, 1909 - INSULAR GOV’T. v. DOROTEO NICO, ET AL.

    014 Phil 288

  • G.R. No. 4606 October 19, 1909 - JUAN RODRIGUEZ v. FINDLAY & CO.

    014 Phil 294

  • G.R. No. 5297 October 19, 1909 - UNITED STATES v. MARTINA BACAS

    014 Phil 308

  • G.R. No. 4935 October 25, 1909 - UNITED STATES v. JAMES L. BROBST

    014 Phil 310

  • G.R. No. 4998 October 25, 1909 - UNITED STATES v. JOSE C. SEDANO

    014 Phil 338

  • G.R. No. 5069 October 25, 1909 - TAN CHUCO v. YORKSHIRE FIRE AND LIFE INSURANCE CO.

    014 Phil 346

  • G.R. No. 5083 October 25, 1909 - TOMAS SUNICO v. JOSE VILLAPANDO, ET AL.

    014 Phil 352

  • G.R. No. 5167 October 25, 1909 - UNITED STATES v. JULIAN MENESES

    014 Phil 357

  • G.R. No. 5227 October 25, 1909 - INT’L. BANKING CORP. v. PILAR CORRALES, ET AL.

    014 Phil 360

  • G.R. No. 4102 October 26, 1909 - JOSE CARDELL v. RAMON MAÑERU, ET AL.

    014 Phil 368

  • G.R. No. 5072 October 27, 1909 - UNITED STATES v. SANTIAGO AUSTERO

    014 Phil 377

  • G.R. No. 5424 October 27, 1909 - UNITED STATES v. PRUDENCIO SOTO

    014 Phil 384

  • G.R. No. 4974 October 29, 1909 - UNITED STATES v. NICOLAS GUTIERREZ, ET AL.

    014 Phil 388

  • G.R. No. 5098 October 29, 1909 - UNITED STATES v. VENANCIO MONASTERIAL, ET AL.

    014 Phil 391

  • G.R. No. 4934 October 30, 1909 - UNITED STATES v. A. C. V. ROSA, ET AL.

    014 Phil 394