Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence


Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence > Year 1912 > February 1912 Decisions > G.R. No. 6539 February 2, 1912 - UNITED STATES v. VICTORINO DE LOS SANTOS

021 Phil 404:




PHILIPPINE SUPREME COURT DECISIONS

FIRST DIVISION

[G.R. No. 6539. February 2, 1912. ]

THE UNITED STATES, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. VICTORINO DE LOS SANTOS, Defendant-Appellant.

Jose Valera y Calderon, for Appellant.

Attorney-General Villamor, for Appellee.

SYLLABUS


1. SEDUCTION; CRIMINAL PROSECUTION; COMPLAINT. — Following the decisions in the cases of U. S. v. Narvas (14 Phil. Rep., 410), U. S. v. De la Cruz (17 Phil. Rep., 139), U. S. v. Castañares (18 Phil. Rep., 210), U. S. v. Ortiz and Regalado (19 Phil. Rep., 174), it is held that the court acquires no jurisdiction over a person charged with the crime of seduction unless the cause is instituted upon the complaint of the aggrieved person, or of the parents, grandparents or guardian of such person.


D E C I S I O N


JOHNSON, J. :


This defendant was charged with the crime of seduction, alleged to have been committed as follows:jgc:chanrobles.com.ph

"In or during the month of May, 1908, the said accused, who was a public official, being president of the municipal board of health, and an inmate or guest in the house of Bernardo Gonzalez, made love to the latter’s daughter, an unmarried girl going on eighteen years, who lived in the same house, and by means of perfidious promises of marriage succeeded in deceiving her, making her believe in his false declarations of love, and had carnal intercourse with her many times in the months of October, November, December, 1908, and March, 1909, wherefrom she became pregnant. The act occurred in the municipality of San Isidro, Province of Nueva Ecija, P. I., in violation of law."cralaw virtua1aw library

The present action was commenced on the 5th of June, 1909, in the court of the justice of the peace of the pueblo of San Isidro, Province of Nueva Ecija. The complaint was presented and signed by the prosecuting attorney of said province. The justice of the peace held a preliminary examination and found that there was probable cause for believing that the defendant was guilty of the crime charged and held him for trial in the Court of First Instance of said province.

On the 27th day of September, 1909, the above complaint was filed in the Court of First Instance of said province by the prosecuting attorney. No complaint was presented either by the aggrieved person or by her parents, grandparents, or guardian, in accordance with the provisions of section 1 of Act No. 1773, neither in the court of the justice of the peace nor in the Court of First Instance.

After hearing the evidence adduced during the trial of the cause, the Honorable Julio Llorente, judge, found the defendant guilty of the crime, with the aggravating circumstance of a grave abuse of confidence, and sentenced him to be imprisoned for a period of two years eleven months and eleven days of prision correccional, with the accessories of the law, to recognize and maintain the child of Virginia Gonzales, and to pay to the said Virginia Gonzales the sum of P500, in case of insolvency to suffer subsidiary imprisonment, and to pay the costs.

From that sentence the defendant appealed and assigned as error in this court that the evidence adduced during the trial of the cause was not sufficient to show that the defendant was guilty of the crime charged.

During the pendency of the cause in this court and probably after the brief of the appellant had been printed, he presented a motion asking that said cause be dismissed for the reason that the complaint presented in the court below had not been presented by the offended party, her parents, grandparents, or guardian. The consideration of this motion was deferred until the cause should be presented upon its merits.

Section 1 of Act No. 1773 provides that the crimes of adulterio, estupro, iapto, violacion, calumnia, and injuria, as defined by the Penal Code, shall be deemed to be public crimes, and shall be prosecuted in the same manner as all other crimes under said code, with the proviso that the prosecution of the crimes of adulterio, estupro, and injuria, committed against persons other than public officials or employees, shall not be instituted except upon the complaint of the aggrieved person, or of the parents, grandparents or guardian of such person.

This court has held in the following cases: U. S. v. Narvas (Nov. 9, 1909, seduction, 14 Phil.’Rep., 410); U. S. v. De la Cruz (Sept. 27, 1910, injurias graves, 17 Phil. Rep., 139); U. S. v. Castanares (Jan. 4, 1911, injurias graves, 18 Phil. Rep., 210); U. S. v. Ortiz and Regalado (March 23, 1911, adultery, 19 Phil. Rep., 174), that where the complaint is not presented by the offended party, her parents, grandparents or guardian, that the court acquires no jurisdiction over the person of the defendant nor the subject matter of the action.

For the foregoing reasons, the judgment of the lower court convicting the defendant of the crime of seduction is hereby reversed, the information dismissed and the defendant ordered discharged from the custody of the law with costs de oficio.

Arellano, C.J., Torres, Mapa, Carson, Moreland and Trent, JJ., concur.




Back to Home | Back to Main




















chanrobles.com





ChanRobles On-Line Bar Review

ChanRobles Internet Bar Review : www.chanroblesbar.com

ChanRobles MCLE On-line

ChanRobles Lawnet Inc. - ChanRobles MCLE On-line : www.chanroblesmcleonline.com






February-1912 Jurisprudence                 

  • G.R. No. 7516 February 1, 1912 - ROMANA QUILATAN, ET AL.vs. EMILIANO CARUNCHO

    021 Phil 399

  • G.R. No. 6539 February 2, 1912 - UNITED STATES v. VICTORINO DE LOS SANTOS

    021 Phil 404

  • G.R. No. 6714 February 2, 1912 - UNITED STATES v. LORENZO MENDOZA

    021 Phil 407

  • G.R. No. 6870 February 2, 1912 - UNITED STATES v. SILVERIO MAMONONG

    021 Phil 414

  • G.R. No. 6242 February 3, 1912 - ARCADIA REYNES v. LA COMPAÑIA GENERAL DE TABACOS DE FILIPINAS, ET AL.

    021 Phil 416

  • G.R. No. 6434 February 6, 1912 - LUCAS REYES v. MGR. JEREMIAH J. HARTY Archbishop of Manila

    021 Phil 422

  • G.R. No. 6707 February 8, 1912 - UNITED STATES v. Go-LENG

    021 Phil 426

  • G.R. No. 6818 February 10, 1912 - ANGELO ANDRES, ET AL. v. VALERIANA PIMENTEL

    021 Phil 429

  • G.R. No. 7265 February 12, 1912 - UNITED STATES v. COSME JUARES ET AL.

    021 Phil 440

  • G.R. No. 4824 February 13, 1912 - BERNARDO RAFANAN LAO SAYCO

    021 Phil 445

  • G.R. No. 6535 February 13, 1912 - ALEJANDRO MONTELIBANO, ET AL. v. DIRECTOR OF LANDS

    021 Phil 449

  • G.R. No. 6614 February 14, 1912 - UNITED STATES v. ONOFRE ODRUÑA ET AL.

    021 Phil 452

  • G.R. No. 6285 February 15, 1912 - PEDRO BARUT v. FAUSTINO CABACUNGAN, ET AL.

    021 Phil 461

  • G.R. No. 6858 February 15, 1912 - UNITED STATES v. DIONISIO LOMONGSOD ET AL.

    021 Phil 474

  • G.R. No. 6897 February 15, 1912 - UNITED STATES v. POLICARPIO TAYONGTONG

    021 Phil 476

  • G.R. No. 6583 February 16, 1912 - RAMON FABIE ET AL. v. CITY OF MANILA

    021 Phil 486

  • G.R. No. 6761 February 16, 1912 - LIM TUICO v. CU-UNJIENG

    021 Phil 493

  • G.R. No. 6789 February 16, 1912 - UNITED STATES v. CALIXTO LARANJA

    021 Phil 500

  • G.R. No. 7286 February 17, 1912 - UNITED STATES v. JUAN RECIO

    021 Phil 511

  • G.R. No. 6909 February 20, 1912 - UNITED STATES v. HACHAW

    021 Phil 514

  • G.R. No. 7132 February 20, 1912 - MARIA ESGUERRA v. MARIANO TECSON ET AL.

    021 Phil 518

  • G.R. No. 6322 February 21, 1912 - DOLORES AVELINO v. VICTORIANA DE LA CRUZ

    021 Phil 521

  • G.R. No. 6741 February 21, 1912 - UNITED STATES v. NEMESIO BONOAN, ET AL.

    022 Phil 1

  • G.R. No. 6759 February 21, 1912 - DEOGRACIAS SEBBANO v. ANDRES SERRANO ARAGON

    022 Phil 10

  • G.R. No. 7154 February 21, 1912 - ELEANOR ERICA STRONG, ET AL. v. FRANCISCO GUTIERREZ REPIDE

    022 Phil 19

  • G.R. No. 5953 February 24, 1912 - ANTONIO M. PABALAN v. FELICIANO VELEZ

    022 Phil 29

  • G.R. No. 6749 February 26, 1912 - ZOILO IBAÑEZ DE ALDECOA, ET AL. v. HONGKONG & SHANGHAI BANKING CORP., ET AL.

    022 Phil 572

  • G.R. No. 5932 February 27, 1912 - DEAN C. WORCESTER v. MARTIN OCAMPO, ET AL.

    022 Phil 42

  • G.R. No. 6413 February 27, 1912 - MUERTEGUY & ABOITIZ v. ISIDORO V. DELGADO

    022 Phil 109

  • G.R. No. 6479 February 27, 1912 - KUENZLE & STREIFF v. SILVERIO F. JIONGCO, ET AL

    022 Phil 110

  • G.R. No. 6705 February 27, 1912 - UNITED STATES v. FELIPE SALVADOR

    022 Phil 113

  • G.R. No. 7029 February 27, 1912 - CHINA NAVIGATION CO. v. CIPRIANO VIDAL, ET AL.

    022 Phil 121

  • G.R. No. 6471 February 29, 1912 - EUGENIO SOBREVILLA v. FELIX C. MONTINOLA, ET AL

    022 Phil 124